Sentences with phrase «doing human tests»

«We were finally doing human tests, and what we were doing was based on years of rational science.

Not exact matches

Current rules do not let people fly drones beyond the line of sight of human operators and over people's heads in public places, which limits companies like Amazon (amzn) and Google (goog) from using drones to deliver goods, among other business uses, beyond testing.

In January 2018, both Microsoft's and Alibaba's deep - learning software did better than humans on reading and comprehension tests, opening the door to artificial intelligence — based customer service, medical diagnoses, and many other applications.

His worry is actually about human testing in the field, but, he says, he's already talking to WHO about how those studies would be done.

Once the system seemed to be working, Kopparapu arranged for tests at a Mumbai hospital to see how the app would perform in a real - life setting, and so far it's done just as well as a human specialist, although the data is limited.

However, that doesn't stop the occasional encounter.Contrary to popular belief, great whites don't mistake surfers for other prey due to poor eyesight — they have great vision.It actually comes down to their inquisitive nature.Great whites are notoriously curious and will taste test unfamiliar objects, including humans.

Testing this new technology is likely being done in the hope of compensating for the branch closures, and to ensure that customers will still be satisfied by online services the bank is offering, especially those that largely rely on human interactions to get answers to queries.

Through research, testing, media, and advocacy, Consumer Reports and Consumers Union will continue to push all automakers to ensure their vehicles are safe, regardless of whether a human or an automated system is doing the driving.

We have long argued that our value investing philosophy stands the test of time because it only requires that: first, human nature does not change; and second, we maintain our discipline.

(We don't need to have our ability to obey tested because we are human and thus have limited ability to obey.)

Total surrender to a God who loves us will result in our being lifted up and rescued from that nothingness simply because he loves us beyond anything we can imagine, BUT, we do have to test that fact, in our human frailty.

Philosophy is great when dealing with abstract, human concepts (beacuse it's process is based around the human as the standard) but without some way to test philosophical treaties, you are just doing thought experiments which may or may not have any bearing on events in the «real» world.

Funny how it doesn't say «No human child testing used.»

Only slowly did the scientific approach of questioning and testing win wider acceptance, and in doing so it set in motion the greatest revolution in human civilization that there has ever been.

Those who do test their faith in the crucible of human experience do become certain that the witness of the Scriptures, rightly interpreted, is true and the God that Jesus proclaims as Loving Father, not the Cosmic Bully proclaimed by the Pharisees, is the True God.

And any claim or belief that we see more or more deeply is always rightly going to be tested in those encounters where we find ourselves working for a vision of human flourishing and justice in the company of those who do not start where we have started.

It is the human endeavor to apply the tests of coherence and comprehensiveness in drawing conclusions about the veracity of certain phenomena — that, for example, axheads do not float on water and the sun does not stand still, that conceptions are not immaculate, that corpses do not rise from graves.

The presupposition behind the counsel to teach the values that Americans share is presumably that American values do pass the test of external and overriding criteria based on shared human experience.

It is manifestly absurd to suppose that the human can be understood solely in terms of what atoms and molecules do in test tubes.

What I then propose to do is, briefly stated, to test saintliness by common sense, to use human standards to help us decide how far the religious life commends itself as an ideal kind of human activity.

The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points: first, that the Asian values argument, as a challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy, is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment without adequate liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering conversations in modern democratic development and as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.

Although, no studies on humans were done to test this, partly out of conflict of interests, partly from human integrity (hopefully).

so often they just look at potential markers — but those don't always equate to diseases)- what was the health of the those being studied - I'm assuming the test subjects were people, but other studies done on animal subjects might not be as reliable as those done on humans.

And in none of these conversations did anyone even suggest that they made a medical decision because of money (in fact my sister actively avoids over-doing tests, etc even though she knows she could be making more money), nor do they suggest the patient is anything less than a feeling human being.

What does trouble me is BPI's use of a raw material which by its very nature is highly pathogenic, such that we all might be endangered in the case of human error (as when BPI's ammonia system stopped working for sixty seconds in 2009, leading to 26,000 + pounds of infected meat)(http://nyti.ms/56MIYK) or a new strain of E coli — not part of BPI's admirably advanced testing protocol — emerges (as one did in Germany last summer, killing 345 and sickening 3,700 +.)

With the TB Blood Test, you don't have to worry about human error or interpretation.

Thank you for doing this if I could I would sign your petition pinkslime is something They are testing on humans its just horrifying.

A pregnant / not pregnant (qualitative) urine human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test such as Clearblue ® can be done as early as 10 days after a missed menstrual period.

In 2007, researchers reported in the journal Early Human Development that children who had received no DHA in formula or breast milk during the first 17 weeks of life had poorer visual acuity at age 4, and did worse on language tests showing verbal IQ, than those who fed breast milk.

Mr Mensah - Bonsu says reasons cited by the Speaker and NDC such as Parliament's inability to investigate a matter before the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) do not stand the test of time.

The charity said this was «particularly concerning» as most of these experiments studied human diseases which do not exist in non-human primates, such as Parkinson's Disease, and this they suggested «significantly challenges» the validity of the tests.

Forward - thinking scientists, many with funding from PETA and its international affiliates, are developing methods for studying diseases and testing products that don't require the use of animals and are actually relevant to human health.

The jobs were not advertised and did not require civil service tests, according to the department heads who oversee the appointments — Ann Rooney, deputy county executive for human services, and Matt Millea, deputy county executive for physical services.

To test whether domestic dogs have learned to process human speech as we do, Victoria Ratcliffe and David Reby at the University of Sussex in Falmer, UK, placed 25 dogs between two speakers.

At present, the standard way to do that is a Pap smear alone, or co-testing using both a Pap smear and a human papillomavirus (HPV) test.

No farm workers tested positive for SADS, so the disease doesn't appear to infect humans.

In the 1990s scientists such as himself, he explains, were too caught up in the promise of gene therapy to realize that they did not know enough about it to warrant human testing.

It's not reasonable to expect that we can do a sustained exploratory program without the capability of testing systems and studying human adaptation to space in low Earth orbit.

Medical students are required to memorize such a huge number of facts — from the anatomy and physiology of every structure in the human body to the fine details of thousands of tests, diagnoses, and treatments — that they generally do not have time to critique the information they must cram into their heads.

John Glass, a senior microbiologist in the synthetic biology group at the J. Craig Venter Institute in Rockville, Maryland, puts it this way: If you can imagine a set of genes that will program a cell to do something — anything — then you can make them «at a reasonable cost and test your hypothesis... so it will be possible to attempt to design organisms that have extraordinary properties to solve human needs.»

«Computational models like this one might one day be able to predict the clinical course of a disease or injury, as well as make it possible to do less expensive testing of experimental drugs and interventions to see whether they are worth pursuing with human trials,» he said.

It typically takes many years to initiate such trials because of the stringent safety testing that must be done before testing in humans begins, but Reynolds said it may be possible to move faster as the therapy only involves modifying a patient's dietary intake and supplementing with a medium - chain triglyceride oil, both of which have no known side effects.

New tests based on human biology can predict many adverse reactions that animal tests fail to do, and could, for example, have detected the risk signals produced by Vioxx, which in animal studies appeared to be safe, and even beneficial to the heart.

Humans with genetic differences related to dopamine transport, she adds, have been shown to do worse on the type of mental fitness tests given to the astronauts and rats alike.

GABA and related therapies would have to be tested in human clinical trials, a process that could take several years, the researchers said, noting that many treatments that work in mice do not always translate into effective human therapies.

«It's a procedure that's non-invasive, doesn't require any drugs, and is already being tested in human trials to see if it's protective of bone loss.»

The study didn't test humans and dogs head to head — I think the dogs might win depending on the odor — but what it shows is the limits of human smell tracking haven't really been investigated.

«The formula companies are all partnering up to get a supply, get prepared, and do big human testing.»

«If the [brochures] do not adequately describe the studies or do not provide adequate context that would allow the IRBs to make a sound judgment about their significance for human testing, then this is a serious problem,» he says.

More work needs to be done before the method can be tested in humans, according to the researchers.