Sentences with phrase «doing objective science»

I found an estimation of the radiative forcing close to earlier estimations by NASA / GISS group when they were still doing objective science.

What can I say but if you want to do objective science, don't do it like climatereason.

There is a coterie of scientists so enamored of the CO2 = AGW hypothesis and so entranced by their models, that they've lost the ability to re-examine assumptions, and to do objective science.

Not exact matches

Most companies in this space only understand the science behind their technology - but don't understand the client's business needs and creative objectives.

But, like Samuel Florman, who fears that «flights through cyberspace, however energizing they may be for the imagination, may weaken the objective rationality needed to do good engineering», I agree with Alan Cromer that the formal linear thinking needed to do science «goes against the grain of traditional human thinking, which is associative and subjective» (Florman 1994).

The present - day methodology of history and science as an accurate accounting of historical events and an objective description of physical processes simply didn't exist when these stories were composed.

I do not think questions of faith are ones that are ultimately decided by empirical and objective proof — that is for the realm of science.

than merely applied science, contemporary medical men are nevertheless right to base themselves on it, and insofar as they do so, they can and must be objective in their profession in the sense described above.

Being a YEC is not an automatic disqualification for doing scientific work because science is driven by an objective methodology, so as long as that methodology is not compromised then one is free to think whatever they please.

moreover, being demonstrable & repeatable does not make something objective — not just in philosophy, but even in the social sciences.

Just as physics reveals little of significance about man until one reflects on the enterprises of science and technology, so scientific psychology, aiming to out - do physics in objective rigor, can yield little insight about man until the distinctive human quality of self - awareness is acknowledged as an essential factor in psychological inquiry.

Christianity, and in fact any religion that believes in a personal god / creator, has two fundamental flaws that have absolutely nothing to do with science and everything to do with logic, which incidentally forms the foundation for the only universal / objective truths of reality (putting aside the Cartesian dualism problem).

because you don't have a single fact to back up your claims whereas science is demonstrably getting closer to the answer with verifiable, objective and independent facts.

The fallacy of objectivity is the notion that science is objective in the sense that subjectivity does not enter into the scientific analysis.

First, when we turn to the social sciences we do not find neutral objective disciplines which can provide the tools and information we need.

When certain sciences, such as psychology, study particular feelings, they do their work in an objective fashion, i.e., with other people's emotions.

Ideas of truth, or beauty or right were not supposed to correspond to any outer or objective reality... the totalitarian regimes did not simply declare, as a dry finding of social science that peoples» ideas were shaped by environment.

As program officer at the National Science Foundation (NSF) Office of International Science and Engineering, Elizabeth Lyons's objective is simple: to help scientists, especially NSF - funded scientists, do more and better sScience Foundation (NSF) Office of International Science and Engineering, Elizabeth Lyons's objective is simple: to help scientists, especially NSF - funded scientists, do more and better sScience and Engineering, Elizabeth Lyons's objective is simple: to help scientists, especially NSF - funded scientists, do more and better sciencescience.

But, she pointedly adds, these «objective» cutoffs disproportionately exclude from the sciences members of underrepresented groups, including women and non-Asian racial minorities, who, on average, do less well than white and Asian men on the GRE, especially on the all - important math section.

He also maintains that Western science is more than simply Western, because it is universal, but this is precisely the claim which conservatives have made a point of rejecting: they do not see a tradition so obviously tied to the history of the West as a system of objective, neutral or universal truth.

The goal of science may be to uncover truth, but uncovering objective truth is a very difficult thing to do, and doing it requires passion.

As management theorist Robert Austin wrote in Science Careers in 2006, «The objectives of principal and agent are thus diametrically opposed: The agent wants to be paid as much as possible for doing as little work as possible, whereas the principal wants to get as much work as possible from the agent while paying as little as possible.»

«This says to me that they do not want objective science,» Peter Meyer, an economist who resigned in protest last month, said in an interview this morning.

«While much additional research must be done to determine the feasibility of this nanoparticle approach as a vision restoration therapy, our results encourage further effort aimed at achieving this critical clinical objective,» said study co-author David Pepperberg, PhD, Searls - Schenk Professor of ophthalmology and visual sciences at UIC.

I'm sure Roger Pielke would vehemently dispute the suggestion that doing «political science» gives one the license to ignore objective scientific truth.

Now we have objective evidence of what does work in the learning and teaching process, which opens a new approach that can be applied to science instruction.

This resource comes with a lesson plan for the Year 2 topic Uses of Everyday Materials (DfE, 2014) and is done in detail with timings, materials, learning objectives, learning outcomes, links to other areas of the curriculum, the science process skills, new vocabulary underlined, and the activity itself.

Is the eighth grade science end - of - grade test cumulative or does it only cover objectives from the eighth grade Standard Course of Study?

A pervasive curiosity, an objective tolerance that finds all shades of opinion interesting and respectable as long as they do not interfere with liberty of inquiry and belief, a systematic pursuit of truth in spite of traditions and doubts — these, much more than a taste for sentimental botany and rhapsodical astronomy, were the product of the five years or so that Voltaire spent in active pursuit of science at Cirey with Madame du Châtelet; like his heroes, he has learned from science, and achieved in his own way a synthesis, quite different from that of the seventeenth century.

I'm sure Roger Pielke would vehemently dispute the suggestion that doing «political science» gives one the license to ignore objective scientific truth.

We are attempting to do objective climate science, rather than to support a particular advocacy position, so direct communication would be greatly appreciated.

Strong had two objectives: create the science needed to prove human CO2 was the problem, and then convince the public that if we didn't act, the outcome would be catastrophic.

Discounting Tamino's analysis because you don't like it or don't consider him objective doesn't detract from the fact the Tamino is a professional time - series analyst whose work in climate science not only stands the test of time but is widely considered a de facto standard in climate science.

My elemental objective is to show how extensive time exclusively devoted to seeing where the accusation came from and whether it has any evidence to back it up reveals a disturbing pattern: Inconsistent narratives that don't line up right; no hard evidence is ever presented proving such skeptics are in an orchestrated arrangement where they are paid industry money in exchange for fabricating false science assessments; and an overall set of talking points which is ultimately traceable to the clique of people surrounding Ross Gelbspan.

It would require a conspiracy if it didn't act to promote it own interests; iow, for government climate science to strive to be objective — now that is something that would require a conspiracy.

In particular blah blah doesn't have any science background and simply imagines that his narrative superficially in the objective idiom of science is the indisputable truth.

Either the IPCC has to choose to produce a Majority and Minority Report (which I don't see happening) or some other entity or group of researchers has to create a more objective assessment of current science.

An objective person knowing all the facts would conclude Soon's work reflected science and the IPCC / Mann's work does not.

Now she's no AGW skeptic but I do think she is make an attempt at objective science and this record looks to be the longest and most informative I've seen anywhere.

With such contempt for law, by what standards do you appeal to by which to establish science as an objective discipline seeking truth, or restore the integrity of climate science?

And hence why Climate Change «contrarians» have, ludicrously relative to Climate Change Naysaying sites, convinced themselves that «John Cook is a liar» and that «Skeptical Science» Censors comments and misrepresents, when it is one of the most objective sites out there (in fact understating a lot of the critiques of Climate Change Naysaying) but one that systematically breaks down most of the basic myths that do drive Climate Change «Naysaying» or Misunderstanding.

When objective (non-IPCC) science research is done, without the political agenda, Earth's climate seems dominated by natural forces.

«We use science because it has this objective point of view or credibility to figure out which policy to use... but by doing that it becomes politicized.»

Truth be told, the headline of this post is not an IPCC quote but obviously it represents what the IPCC is attempting to convince the public of, and unfortunately, the real - world, objective science does not support it in the least.

While our ideological preconceptions undoubtedly affect how we synthesize information, and even «objective» science is not immune from confirmation bias, this does not mean that folks are unable to reason or change views.

It's also good, if you're setting yourself to be an «objective auditor of the science», that you audit cr*p denialist papers as well as those which give results you don't like.

Nuclear sceptics — Monbiot compares them to «climate change deniers» — don't believe that the science of the pro-nuclear argument has been produced by a transparent, objective and impartial process.

'' Deletion of outlier data is a controversial practice frowned on by many scientists and science instructors; while mathematical criteria provide an objective and quantitative method for data rejection, they do not make the practice more scientifically or methodologically sound, especially in small sets or where a normal distribution can not be assumed.»

That's like expecting the IPCC to do an objective analysis of the general field of «climate science.»

Freedom to pursue objective knowledge, which is the sine qua non of science, must mean that science is done for the sake of that knowledge alone; for its own sake.