Sentences with phrase «doing slow negative»

Instead of doing slow reps, try doing slow negative and explosive - fast positive.

Do slow negatives again.

Not exact matches

«Once you start to talk about slowing momentum you do open up the risk that the slowing momentum could then turn into negative momentum,» said Wald, adding that he would «stay away» from Apple at this juncture.

«I felt like if I didn't do it now, I wouldn't have a chance to stop or slow what I felt was a negative trend for the Mavs and NBA.»

lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HUslow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HUslow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HUSLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.

Positives Our defence has a leader with wealth of experience Creativity in abundance Ramsey still has licence to make late runs to the box Xhaka and wilshere both play 6s taking turns to hold and doing the dirty work Sanchez and Ozil switching wings havoc through crossing or cutting inside Lacazette being provided for Giroud our option from the bench Negatives Ozil playing as a winger wouldn't defend (mustafi will provide cover as he wouldn't overlap as much as bellerin) No Giroud Lacazette dynamic combination (would still happen by subbing wilshere caution for injuries Ramsey moves to 8 lacazette plays behind Giroud) Slow and aging metserker (makes up for with football brain and also pacy wing backs) No outright cdm (wouldn't need one as no overlapping wing backs to cover as creativity is enough ufront would concentrate on defending

Change is a slow process but it's not a negative, it's an opportunity to improve what you're doing; we're always trying to be ahead of the curve.

At the final rep, do an isometric hold for as long as you can, then finish it off with a very slow negative rep.

However, you don't have to do negative rep training just to get into a tempo — you can do both quick and slow reps which will both perform on the positive instead of the negative side.

To get maximum benefits, you need to focus on doing the exercises the right way: full contraction, slow negative, full stretch.

Use full range of motion and perform both the positive and negative portion of the movement in a slow, controlled manner, and don't forget to squeeze the calves as hard as possible.

(u won't be able to go to slow cause of the heavy weight, just don't totally cut the negative and drop it

All of that aside, do you recall when I mentioned that the negative impact of ketones was that they often ran the risk of slowing down — and potentially shutting down — your thyroid?

For example, if you were doing pull ups, and could not achieve the final repetition, try performing a negative, where you start at the top, with your chin at the bar and slowly lower yourself down as slow as you can.

Unfortunately, training (mostly) slow negatives with high weights once a week or so just didn't work for me and my training partner, we lost muscle and some strength.

If you mean slow, controlled Muscle - Ups, then False - Grip Pull - Ups, Russian Dips and Muscle - Up Negatives once or twice a week for 3 - 5 sets of 3 - 5 reps will do.

If you do 10 slow reps (slow on both the positive and negative portions) with a relatively light weight, say 75 % of your 1RM, then do 10 superfast reps, and finish with 10 normal - speed reps, you can fatigue both the slow - and fast - twitch muscle fibers and induce growth.

If you find this to be the case, just work the beginning of the rep this way and go back to doing even slower negative reps for the top of the movement until your strength increases in this position enabling you to do the real deal.

and don't even think about slowing down to get the negative.

We'd avoid the Easytronic automatic gearbox, though — it's an automated manual, rather than a full automatic, so while it doesn't have a negative affect on fuel economy, it does make the car less enjoyable to drive, with slow and jerky changes.

I am getting pretty sick of all these negative reviews.I have had no problems with the reader.I downloaded all my books from my kobo account and also books from my computer that were downloaded from dutch sources.It works perfectly fine and I do not see it as a piece of junk.It might be a little slower then the kindle fire but so what.

If the Fed does increase rates or otherwise slow the QE, it signals the economy is heating which has typically been negative for gold as a safe haven.

Describes a business cycle phase when economic growth slows sharply but does not turn negative, while inflation falls or remains low.

If they have an accident and you don't catch them, don't punish them as they do not understand what they are being punished for and it will only slow down your progress as they will have a negative association with going to the bathroom.

Only negative I've had is needing to ask a technician to slow down with a puppy that was scared, but that's not uncommon for me to do in any practice.

You don't know what kind of positive or negative stimuli your new companion has been exposed to in the past, and so you generally have to go a bit slower.

I didn't fully see, until the cancer, how we fight every day against the creeping negatives of the world, how we struggle daily against the slow lapping of cynicism.

Ultimately our paper shows that all three of the main conclusions in DK12 are faulty: the rate of OHC increase has not slowed in recent years, there is no evidence for «climate shifts» in global heat content data, and the recent OHC data do not support the conclusion that the net climate feedback is negative or that climate sensitivity is low.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Apparently, since data such as the all time record HIGH Antarctic sea ice, advancing Arctic sea ice, slowing to non existent GMSL at less than 2 / mm annual (and negative in some recent years), flat to lower global temps for almost 2 decades, and all the myriads of other associated data... flatly, empirically, REFUTE this cadre of AGW grant leaching con artists pretending to do science with grossly false models....

I don't see how you can argue against the logic that weaker solar increases negative North Atlantic Oscillation states, and that negative NAO is directly associated with slower trade winds and hence increased El Nino.

Simply extrapolating historical trends also does not account for feedbacks in the system, such as the negative ice thickness - ice growth rate feedback identified by Bitz and Roe (2004) that can slow the ice volume rate of loss.