Sentences with phrase «doing something in the book»

I don't think that he has a place... he's not doing something in the book.

I would like to see them do something in books.

Not exact matches

So I would pull out the book I kept in my desk and read until something to do came up.»

And I don't think that's acceptable in any context, so in the case I wrote about in the book, I felt I had an obligation to do something about it, and I did.

The final deadly mistake is not following common design principles, which is something that Steve Krug talks about in his book Don't Make Me Think.

You might not be thinking about what books, articles or speeches to create, but there has probably been a point in time where you have talked yourself out of pursuing something, because you convinced yourself that you lack a certain level of creativity that it takes to get the job done.

Worse, when I actually did have time to indulge in something entertaining — reading a book, watching a movie or attending a college football game — it was almost impossible for me to fully enjoy the experience due to the gnawing guilt that I was not at trade show or making a sales call or reconciling the financials.

«The title alone of this book has been a great lesson for me, and I think it is something that every leader has to do or learn to get comfortable with to manage stress and stay productive, effective, and happy in their role.

He nicknamed this scenario «Jedi Psychology Marketing» and explains it perfectly in his book: «If there's something you really want, and you think it's in rapidly diminishing supply, you'll do anything to get it RIGHT NOW!»

In thinking about my book, Sex, Bombs and Burgers, in an American context — which I've been doing a lot of lately given its U.S. launch this week — I've been reading up on something called «exceptionalism.&raquIn thinking about my book, Sex, Bombs and Burgers, in an American context — which I've been doing a lot of lately given its U.S. launch this week — I've been reading up on something called «exceptionalism.&raquin an American context — which I've been doing a lot of lately given its U.S. launch this week — I've been reading up on something called «exceptionalism.»

Instead, reserve some time and energy to do something that simply makes you feel good in the moment, whether it's reading a book, watching a movie, going for a walk or taking an entire day off from work.

That's 180,000 words over a three - month span, a goodish length for a book — something in which the reader can get happily lost, if the tale is done well and stays fresh.»

I'm doing it because I want to give value to people first, so that if I ever need something in the future, I want to guilt all of you into buying my book.

Buying books in bulk to pass out isn't something that I normally do.

As an example, I not only agented this book myself to a major NYC - area publisher, I brought in Jay and his famous brand, I brought in Stephen M.R. Covey for the foreword, and even wrote my own back cover (something most authors never get to do when working with a major publisher).

The (main) reason is that we don't have something like that in Germany: / Sorry, can't give you much more information on that topic but this book (which I highly recommend) has one chapter about it.

I read Russo - Gill's book on Peter Cundill — There is Always Something to Do — soon after it was published in 2011, but not the Routines and Orgies book on the same subject.

This is a book about what happens when the smartest people in the room decide something is inevitable, and yet it doesn't come to pass.

There is nothing in the Book of Mormon that does not agree with the Bible unless, possibly, it be your «weird» interpretation of something in the Bible.

He was doing a book tour, and we were hanging out and talking about his graphic novels, and I had told him that I was interesting in maybe collaborating with him on something if he had any pages he didn't know what to do with to send them over to me, and I would try to write some songs or something.

I'm sure I'm not using the right wording but it is easy to say something is outdated dogma by only looking at the last line of a book that has been in process for 2,000 years (i.e. 9 times older than the government trying to tell it what to do).

Even if you didn't read the books, Neil Patrick Harris is great in everything he's in, so there's still something for everyone.

But then I don't worship hope, or pray to it in the hope that it will intervene in something or other, or believe that it inspired people to write down its thoughts and laws in a set of books that encapsulate truth for all eternity, or believe that it sent its son to redeem us from sin.

And, I might add, it is during those times when these acceptable behaviors are in effect that holy books write them down for all time, and instead of a law that can be changed, we have an excuse to keep doing something long after it has become unacceptable.

Maybe you might want to read a science book one day, they do a good job of proving things with FACTS, something your god hypothesis is sorely lacking in.

For the readers of / believers in the bible and the quran: just because someone wrote something down in a book doesn't make it true.

There are so many different people and age groups who read that book but I hear from you all most: the late - teens and twenty - something women, the ones in high school, university or college, sometimes you're newly married, rarely do you have children yet.

In the graciousness of the book (something often lacking when people engage Emergent, no names but...), in its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to reaIn the graciousness of the book (something often lacking when people engage Emergent, no names but...), in its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to reain its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to reain its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to reain love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to reain its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to reain the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to read.

For many atheists (and I'm not saying agnostics, because I know there is a chapter in the book about agnostics) committing to steps that are dependent on something you believe doesn't exist is nearly impossible.

Our book is meant t be suggestive only LOL God luck I have feeling AA will weather the hate as it has the last 75 + years and continue to reach out to those so desperately in need of sobriety for free LOL If you read this and want to get sober please try AA if it doesn't work for you find something that does.

In Richard Stearns» excellent book, The Hole in Our Gospel, the president of World Vision explained, «It is not our fault that people are poor, but it is our responsibility to do something about it.&raquIn Richard Stearns» excellent book, The Hole in Our Gospel, the president of World Vision explained, «It is not our fault that people are poor, but it is our responsibility to do something about it.&raquin Our Gospel, the president of World Vision explained, «It is not our fault that people are poor, but it is our responsibility to do something about it.»

So, here we are believing whatever story there is in a «holy book» written based on the account of one person that none of us knew, but had an apparition in the middle of the night to get to do something.

You people actually believe you have something with your almighty nothingness wonder??? Take your college degrees and books away and what do you have??? Your almighty nothingness, so please start reconciling with yourselves that your not going to amount to anything in life other than being piggy bank for the U.S. Govt.

Just because something's written in an ancient scroll, that got non-unanimously VOTED by humans into a set of books, does not mean it's true.

Just because something is written in a book doesn't mean it happened.

Maybe the Holy Spirit is at work around the world to bring multiple authors and pastors and theologians to similar ideas about similar things all at once, and so when I read something in someone else's book that sounds a lot like something I have written, but they don't give me credit, it is not that they «borrowed» from me, but because both of us were listening to what the Spirit has been whispering to minds all over the world.

So it seems reasonable that a book about the content of education should treat subjects covering a wide spectrum — not exhaustively of course, but only so as to show why each one is important and to indicate something of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that need to be developed in each area and how this may be done.

If your book says «kill all those that stand in your way», the least you can do is own up to it and not try to spout off something lame like «oh, you have to take it in context.»

Odd again, because, despite my best efforts to see something heroic in this man's biography, which might explain what his prose does not, I confess to see at best what Stephen Spender referred to, in a 1979 New York Review of Books piece (March 25, p. 13) on modern German self - analysis, as «der Nebel,» the fog that «allows people to live with unbearable experiences»; the fog that made it possible to «go along» or «not know.»

«I don't believe in any actual thinking God that marks the fall of every bird in Australia or every bug in India, a God that records all of our sins in a big golden book and judges us when we die — I don't want to believe in a God who would deliberately create bad people and then deliberately send them to roast in a hell He created - but I believe there has to be something» — Stephen King

So until God raises up something new in my life, or gives me direction on what He wants me to do, or maybe just gives me permission to pick back up where I left off because I needed a Sabbath rest, I will not regularly publish new blog posts, write new books, respond to comments, or interact with people much on the various social sites.

So, Carl Henry stood up in the 50s and 60s and said something had to be done, and out of his famous book «Uneasy Conscience» arose a new movement: «evangelicalism.»

In Moulton's volume on Greek moods in the New Testament, additionally, Moulton explains that the formula for wishing can be translated as «let it be x.» In this book, written in 1906, Moulton uses examples of anachronistic uses of the optative in colloquial English, including «would that it be so» or «be it so,» something comparable to the English translation of the vulgate's fiat, «let it be done.&raquIn Moulton's volume on Greek moods in the New Testament, additionally, Moulton explains that the formula for wishing can be translated as «let it be x.» In this book, written in 1906, Moulton uses examples of anachronistic uses of the optative in colloquial English, including «would that it be so» or «be it so,» something comparable to the English translation of the vulgate's fiat, «let it be done.&raquin the New Testament, additionally, Moulton explains that the formula for wishing can be translated as «let it be x.» In this book, written in 1906, Moulton uses examples of anachronistic uses of the optative in colloquial English, including «would that it be so» or «be it so,» something comparable to the English translation of the vulgate's fiat, «let it be done.&raquIn this book, written in 1906, Moulton uses examples of anachronistic uses of the optative in colloquial English, including «would that it be so» or «be it so,» something comparable to the English translation of the vulgate's fiat, «let it be done.&raquin 1906, Moulton uses examples of anachronistic uses of the optative in colloquial English, including «would that it be so» or «be it so,» something comparable to the English translation of the vulgate's fiat, «let it be done.&raquin colloquial English, including «would that it be so» or «be it so,» something comparable to the English translation of the vulgate's fiat, «let it be done.»

I didn't write the book to point - by - point go through Scripture's every mention of womanhood in an effort to prove something.

As for me, I always self - publish my books (though that might change in the future) because traditional publishers would never allow me to give my books away for free, and right now, that is something I really enjoy doing with all the books I write.

Just because you like a book that absolves you from learning anything doesn't mean you will get anywhere in life without... wait for it... LEARNING SOMETHING!!!!!

This year they wanted to do something different — to read the books in the order they appear.

Though I appreciate the hope of this quote, I hope your book doesn't fall into the trap of trying to explain something that in itself is convuluted, at times insideous and often beyond reason.

During the Caliphate of Othman, it is reported, an important leader came to him beseeching him to do something about the matter lest the Moslems come to «differ in the Holy Book as the Jews and Christians differ in their scriptures.

In his book Quitter, Jon Acuff says «I don't want you to wake up at 65 and realize, «I spent 40 of my best years doing something that just funded my life.