20 or 30 minutes a day of calorie counting adds up quickly, and there are probably more important things you could be
doing than counting calories.
Not exact matches
Rather
than counting calories or estimating macros, Menud goes straight to the source... the professionals that
do this really well!»
Hi James, so sorry but sadly I don't have the
calorie content for my recipes as I much prefer to
count nutrients and goodness rather
than calories!
So sorry but I don't have any nutritional information for any of my recipes as I much prefer to
count goodness rather
than things like
calories.
So sorry but I don't have the nutritional value for my recipes, I prefer to
count goodness rather
than calories.
Hi Simone, I don't provide nutrition information for my recipes as I worry that can people get too hung up on
counting calories rather
than counting goodness.
Sorry Scott, I don't give nutritional values as I am much more focussed on getting as much goodness as I can
than counting calories!
Hi Simone, I don't provide nutrition information for my recipes as I worry that people become too hung up on
counting calories rather
than counting goodness!
Hi Sally, so sorry but I don't have the
calorie content for any of my recipes, I much prefer to
count goodness rather
than calories.
I don't have a nutritional profile such as the
calorie content for the recipes at it's all about feeding your body with goodness rather
than counting calories.
I don't usually calculate nutritional information for my recipes because I try to focus on eating appropriate portions of whole foods rather
than counting calories.
It has a lower
calorie count than many other sweeteners and when digested, doesn't raise blood sugar the way sugar
does.
I cut it into six servings instead of eight to make it a bit more substantial but still less
than 350
calories (I don't
count points).
I
calorie count and
do a food journal but the program I use doesn't really break down anything other
than calories, fat, carbs, and protein.
It has a lower
calorie count than sugar and when digested, it
does not raise your blood sugar the way sugar
does.
But fats
do have over twice the
calories per gram
than protein or carbs so if you are
counting calories, then it would be best to have a smaller portion of a high fat food.
A glass of wine has a pretty low
calorie count compared to other alcoholic beverages, so it is definitely a good choice of drink to go with meals or to order on a night out — as long as it doesn't turn into more
than a few glasses.
But rather
than doing the
counting themselves, dieters are assigned a
calorie level, and counselors show them how to follow that level using a combo of Jenny Craig cuisine or grocery - store food.
People don't bother
counting things like fruits or some vegetables, despite the fact that many of them can have just as many or more
calories than things like rice and potatoes.
They contain whey protein but also a lot of other stuff you don't want in a powder — sugars and fats that pump up the
calorie count, usually leading to more body - fat gain
than lean mass.
When you're working hard to lose weight and improve your health, you'll need to
do more
than exercise regularly and
count calories.
Whether you
count calories and eat less
than you burn, or you don't
count calories and eat less
than you burn, the end result is the same you lose weight.
I don't
count calories anymore, but I have lost 10 pounds so far, have more
than enough energy to hit the gym 5 days a week, and can still stay out on the dance floor until the lights come on.
im not against low carb at all, keto or original atkins are not my favorite ways to approach it, but Im very much in favor of certain types of low carb diets, particularly higher protein, diets with moderate carb restriction... i use low carb, hi - protein for contest prep myself... unfortunately, what pervades much of the low carb world still today, is this belief that
calories do nt matter or
calories do nt
count or what you alluded to, that you can have a
calorie deficit and not lose fat... whats really happening is that low carb / higher protein can be a very good way to automatically control appetite and
calorie intake, and is also often important for some peoples health given their metabolic status (not very carb tolerant, etc)... its also unfortunate that many in the low carb community are among the ones to suggest that exercise is a waste of time, etc etc, which is also not true and
does great disservice to many who listen... low carb
does nt work due to some voodoo or because the law of thermodynamics
does nt apply... it works mainly because it controls
calories and for some people, helps them achieve
calorie deficit better
than other diets... when folks show up here and suggest «i was in a
calorie deficit but wasnt losing» or «exercise
does nt work» thats when we cant help but grimace... or chuckle...
Calorie -
counting is a thing of the past, my energy levels are back to normal, and I don't exercise more
than three times a week.
In this revolutionary weight - loss program informed by more
than 1,200 scientific studies, fitness and diet expert Jonathan Bailor offers concrete evidence that the
calorie -
counting model of weight loss doesn't work.
I have tried a ton of things Eat Clean Diet, I am considered a Lifetime Weight Watchers (that I have gained all the weight back plus 20 lbs doesn't matter to them) I have
done the
calorie counting (which for some reason I ended up GAINING weight rather
than losing) color coded containers, plain ol' clean eating, vegetarian style living, 6 small meals, 3 square meals.
I usually go below
calorie count sometimes and sometimes I over
do it with exercise that I think I burned more
than what I ate.
So total
calorie count was probably slightly (but not very) lower
than what I ate, but I didn't care about
calories because I was never very hungry so didn't overeat.
This is the reason why Keto
does not include
calorie counting, but instead advises people to eat to satisfaction, which amazingly comes from much less food
than when carb intake is substantial.
Spending all day using your fist and palm to measure shit, doesn't make you better
than someone who
counts calories.
So
calories do count — but of course there's more to it
than that.
I'm new to all this healthy eating and
calorie counting thing but it's time for a change I'm just wondering if I am going to loose weight exercising 6 times a week and eating 2700
calories or
do I need less
than that?
Diets... I've
done the 6 week body makeover diet (for 2 years), paleo (off and on), clean eating / whole foods (most of the time for the past decade or so), vegetarian (for 4 years in my teens), vegan (never have lasted more
than a few days in a row), and
calorie counting.
Studies have shown that people who
count calories have dramatically more success at losing weight and keeping it off
than those who don't.
I generally don't recommend
counting calories, because I think it can get exhausting and somewhat discouraging when you consider food only as a source of
calories rather
than enjoying nutritious food and the benefits it can have on your health.
We mix this with the large breed adult foot since it is higher
calorie than his prior food - that would be my only warning, he
did gain a lot of weight when we switched to this food as it is a MUCH higher protein and
calorie count (which is good,
We mix this with the large breed adult foot since it is higher
calorie than his prior food - that would be my only warning, he
did gain a lot of weight when we switched to this food as it is a MUCH higher protein and
calorie count (which is good, I have a golden retriever who is about 9 months old now who use to have horrible flakey skin and was constantly itchy.
We mix this with the large breed adult foot since it is higher
calorie than his prior food - that would be my only warning, he
did gain a lot of weight when we switched to this food as it is a MUCH higher protein and
calorie count (which is good, we just can't go run miles when it's 120 + in the summer months.)