Regarding Walcotts form I guess he is reaping rewards for what Iwobi is
doing the other side with Alexis upfront.
Not exact matches
But what most outsiders don't understand (along
with a lot of prospective hires on the
other side of the conversation) is just how personally the entrepreneur takes the compensation negotiations.
If the deadlock remains and talks don't proceed to the next phase, both
sides could find themselves trading
with each
other under World Trade Organization rules, which means higher tariffs.
But at that point, the Fed chair Janet Yellen and the
other members of the interest rate - setting committee seemed to
side with the idea that Trump's policies would
do more to help the economy than hurt it.
However, a deep divide is emerging across the EU,
with one
side calling for further controls and the
other pushing for each country to
do their part, against a backdrop of widespread border confrontations and chaos.
Rather, slight almost imperceptible changes in your accent to mirror your opponent in the negotiation can create an unconscious feeling of familiarity
with you without the
other side even realizing it, to the extent that it can, and often
does, assist in the negotiation of a deal.
One of the things her team is
doing is a push toward «all - to - all» trading, which enables buy -
side funds to trade directly
with other buy -
side funds.
When you
do that, you'll find that
others who agree
with you will rally to your
side.
Of course, the challenge of
doing so is a two - headed coin,
with immediate gratification on one
side and a lack of human capital investment on the
other.
«The reason you won't see a compromise anytime soon is because Congress actually acting in the wake of Orlando would be a tacit admission on the
other side that guns had something to
do with what happened in Orlando as opposed to ISIS,» he said, using an acronym for Islamic State.
On the one
side is an American technology company
with a history of questionable business practices, and on the
other is an outdated bureaucracy that
does much to keep transportation costs high in the city.
«Physicians
do not know about the appropriate dosage, the potential
side effects and how it could interact
with other medications.»
[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the
other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will
do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work
with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will
do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?
Going into the Algiers OPEC meeting in late September, the prevailing sentiment among the analyst community was that there is no way any deal will get
done: after all there was no secret that the recent animosity between Iran and Saudi Arabia had recent reached unprecedented levels,
with both
side directly involved across from each
other in the Syrian proxy war.
If our device could be moved close to where it is needed, but still on the energy producer's
side of that equation, yet just outside the meter, then the energy producers could have millions of these small devices that they own and operate, because grandma doesn't want to become her own utility company because she has a solar panel, but if the utility companies and energy providers could compete
with each
other to have small units that are so close to the loads, they still get the full advantage of being a supplier of energy, except
with just millions of little plants, they can avoid needing transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, et cetera, that everybody is talking about being expensive, unreliable, and subject to issues.
The difference
with the tariffs that this government is bringing in — $ 330 million or more on tariffs and interestingly enough they're taking Sony to court for hesitating to pay tariffs that this government on the
other side says doesn't actually exist, but if it doesn't exist how can they be taking them to court for not paying them?
«In their corporate bylaws they have numerous hurdles set up where you have to jump through the perfect hoop that is on fire
with three tigers on the
other side and come out safely,» he said, adding that he believes he has
done that «to the best of my ability.»
Providing sufficient evidence to both WRP and PC base that detest the
other side right now... that they have to live
with differences, to get together under one tent if they don't want to risk giving NDP Calgary again via vote splitting.
The
other side the coin is having a partner whose interests are not aligned
with you, is not a value add investor,
does not understand your business, and has completely different ideas about what the direction of the company should be.
This has a lot to
do with who's on the
other side of the table.
Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has
others too that have been
with me for years that are not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along
side of me, but I
do not want you to come against them as they have their own trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my testimony: I am God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along
side witnesses as His testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because God
does not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?
You believe this to be true, so if faced
with this door,
do you open it and walk through,
with the expectation that what is on the
other side is exactly what you think it is?
Too bad she
did not use the opportunity in class to deal
with a very important issues, so she would not become as hard - headed about the matter as the professor was, on the
other side.
Do not poison
others with your condescending comments... and this goes for BOTH
sides of the issue.
Don't just emote or dismiss the
other side with labels.
Intelligent discourse, even
with people
with whom one disagrees, should be
done with humility and respect — even if the
other side is not exhibiting the same humility and respect.
To continue to draw up — as many of our denominational leaders
do — battle lines
with humanists on one
side and theists on the
other is specious and still reflects the popular, but otiose, approach to the whole debate.
the three religions may have all started in Genesis
with Abraham, but they don't end up in the same place... if you want the study the differences in the religions, look to the book of Revelation on one
side and islamic end - times / last day studies on the
other hand... the big difference between Islam and Christianity is the mirror image of the end time personalities mentioned in Revelation...
As a recovering christian, 5 years clean and open minded, the truth definitely
did set me free - it set me free of the horrors and fear that come
with christianity; it allowed me to look at things from all
sides (putting the shoe on the
other foot so to speak); it allowed me to love more freely and be a better person.
Lutheran theology's antinomian tendency makes it perhaps more vulnerable than the
other Reformation traditions in spite of the countervailing forces of its sociology and its doctrinal tradition, although here and there an older methodology, which understands that the Gospel
does not negate the commandments, lives
side by
side with neo-Lutheranism and makes possible at least a tentative no to the likes of the task force.
The problem is that their «Jesus» doesn't ask them any hard questions; but is more like a child's «invisible friend» who is always on thier
side whenever they find themselves in a conflict
with others.
I can
do what I like
with my holiday, and I don't have to rename and reconfigure it to please one
side or make it about something I don't believe in to appease the
other, neither Jesus or Saturn or any
other myth that was once attached to the day.
She should certainly not become one
sided, expecting everything from a gimmick, but she must not want to
do everything
with the same energy either; she must have the courage to concentrate her finite powers on a few points, even though this will mean giving up
other important things.
But he didn't say to the thief on the
other side of him, today you will not be
with me in Paradise.
All
sides of this issue could to learn to respect one another, even if they don't agree
with the actions, beliefs, or practices of the
other.
Somehow, we have to break the identification of the
sides on abortion
with the
sides on religion, and I'm not sure how to
do that without one
side or the
other surrendering on abortion.
In that way, it
does n`t seem like both
sides are taking the journey together and it's up to 1
side to come to terms
with the
other rather than a coming to terms
with both groups involved.
In contrast to a view of divine love which
does not admit that God
sides with the oppressed, Hartshorne holds that God favors the creaturely exercise of freedom up to the point where it becomes excessive and is a threat to the freedom of
others to pursue their interests.
But on the
other side, the noun «pastor» has been applied as a substantive to the minister, and then anything that he
did as pastor was regarded as «pastoring» or «shepherding,» thus equating shepherding
with anything properly
done by a minister.
There is no suggestion that he expects the minister to
do everything he needs, nor on the
other side that he expects the minister to be concerned only
with narrowly religious matters and not also in his overall situation, condition, and attitude.
if you can lie to yourself
with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your
side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God,
with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're
with your significant
other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're
with your significant
other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
Just because evil is always relative
does not mean we as humans can not see ourselves in
others and share that
with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your
side.»
But before I
did, I decided to discuss the issue
with several medical professionals, some of whom are on the «pro-life»
side and
others of whom are on the «pro-choice»
side, including a handful of abortion providers.
Sometimes we just have to be satisfied
with having spoken to the
other side and expressed ourselves, as
do they.
Don't mention something if you KNOW that i will present the
other side, and you disagree
with it.
Enough
with the sensationalist journalism pretending there's some giant Christian vs atheist fight, when reality is the majority of sane people on both
sides really couldn't care less what the
other side does.
American Evangelicals might have gone to Uganda to campaign for anti-gay legislation, but so
did other powerful figures on the gay lobby
side, including President Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron, threatening African governments
with the withdrawal of aid if they didn't conform to the new Western normal.
If we were to apply Niebuhr's real politics,
with its ready acceptance of the inevitability of conflict, to the present nuclear situation, it could well mean «a perverse preference for the war of mutual annihilation, simply because the war of mutual annihilation means, at least, that the
other side doesn't win either.»
I think often we read ourselves as Jesus and
others as the Pharisees too — I don't think I've heard many sermons taking what Jesus says to the Pharisees as a direct challenge to us, as opposed to assuming that we're on Jesus»
side and confronting those who disagree
with us.
For if, on the one
side, he has never left any doubt that they are and must be clearly distinguishable, whether or not adequately distinguished, on the
other side, I have no more inclination than he
does simply to identify philosophy
with metaphysics.