Sentences with phrase «doing wrong focus»

Not exact matches

In other words, politicians and the media focus on the wrong metrics — and even when different economic measurements get a little attention, we still don't get it right.

The author of «Getting Things Done» says people focus on the wrong parts of his productivity system

Companies and governments haven't done enough to trim industrial overcapacity, focusing on wrong - headed programs like Cash for Clunkers that artificially boost demand.

Teams get to this spot because they are more focused on what has gone wrong in the past, than what they can do about impacting the future.

I don't know that my world was rocked, but the session helped me more than I thought it would, just by focusing me on exactly what Camp says is wrong with too many negotiators today: a weakness for compromise from the get - go.

This is especially true when it comes to leadership, where focusing on individual achievement gives kids the wrong idea about how work gets done.

«I didn't see anything wrong with getting married, having kids, and focusing on my career,» he says.

One can do this by reading critical reviews that all focus on the same negatives; if most critics are saying something is wrong, it probably is.»

One can do this by reading critical reviews that all focus on the same negatives; if most critics are saying something is wrong, it probably is,» King wrote.

Taking responsibility when things go wrong instead of blaming others isn't masochistic, it's empowering — because then you focus on doing things better or smarter next time.

But, too often, we focus on the wrong things; we focus on what we don't want rather than what we do want.

In the past it was a struggle for me to listen to a presentation when I walked off the stage because it was painful with all the focus on the things I did «wrong.»

At the heart of the dispute, according to the court documents, is the fact that Silent Circle has struggled to sell the Blackphone, with its failure associated with wrong assumptions of demand for the privacy - focused smartphone and partnerships that did not push through.

We do that naturally, both at the workplace and when we work in groups the focus is on what can go wrong.

My students at Peking University, for example, are extremely supportive and think very differently about what I do, and I think I have convinced them that as future policymakers, especially in finance and central banking, rather than join the hype that has always accompanied every growth miracle it is their responsibility to be focus on risks and on all the ways things can go wrong.

Lets not focus on what the church is doing right or wrong, and lets focus on what we are doing right or wrong in our own actions.

If we need to write more songs or design more light shows only to amuse ourselves and keep us focused (nothing wrong with doing those things; I'm pointing to the reason for doing them), then we have not yet understood that a worship tradition — a worship routine, if you will — is how we reinforce our worship desire.

Which is good, don't get me wrong... Focusing on religion is great for someone like you.

It isn't wrong to have it - but if we are wringing our hands over what to do with it - maybe we have too much of it - and we are focused on it too much.

If I don't see the sync, then I don't try to decode the sector header, because I don't really know where the sector decoding process should really start.So I really have to focus on why I'm not seeing the SYNC's, and try to improve that, and then worry about the DATA later.Now don't get me wrong, I'm pretty excited about seeing the valid data!And maybe by using a better test file, I might be able to determine WHY the SYNC's are not being read properly.

At least we know what liberation theology is, it focuses on historically accurate events and how to overcome the wrongs done in the past.

How about focusing on what we do wrong ourselves before God ourselves instead of focusing on others and love and pray for others instead?

I do think there are some boundaries and guidelines for us, but sometimes, we focus on the wrong ones...

If you do pick and choose, you should worship me, because I'll make millions of claims and when some of them come true, people like you will ignore all the times I was wrong and focus in on when I was right.

Hey Laughing, if you are trying Buddhism by focusing only on yourself you are doing it exactly wrong.

If this country would start focusing on how to help one another instead of to hurt them our world would be a much better place to live... And just so everyone knows I did lose someone close to me in 911 and at the same time 1 of my best friends are Muslim so it goes to show that 2 wrongs do not make a right!!!!

They focus so much on the wrong doing instead of loving the person.

When conscience has become abnormally focused on the self, fears of doing wrong can become obsessions and we like to be a problem to ourselves.

These folks got the day wrong, focused on the wrong thing, but that does not exclude them from eventual salvation.

It was suicide already being a mormon in the US for most part of its coming forth add to the friendly and open warm feeling that was held against black people and you got a sure receipe for death and persecution... I think God mostly knows people and that he did nt need his Church to be more slaughtered then it was, or focus on the wrong issues.

Pretty much all I got from your paragraph is that we're more tolerant than a lot of other places so we should be happy with that instead of focusing on how our society still does stuff wrong.

The website is something of a bad news dump that suffers from the common activist practice of focusing on everything that's wrong but less of what is being done that is good.

Instead of blaming others for what's wrong in your life, focus on what you can do to make things better.

Have your boss (or spouse) predominantly (not totally) have their focus on what they think is wrong with you and see what it does to your work or marriage relationship.

Don't get me wrong, I do not disagree with those fans who call for change, as the running of the club does appear strongly for business purposes, instead of for the fans and the glory as Chelsea, Manchester United and Manchester City seem to be focused odo not disagree with those fans who call for change, as the running of the club does appear strongly for business purposes, instead of for the fans and the glory as Chelsea, Manchester United and Manchester City seem to be focused on.

Maybe I'm wrong though, maybe he is focused but just doesn't make the grade is all.

wow are we sterile up top, goals need to come from defense again, ozil & cech were great, mert once again taking the brunt of bad comments meanwhile a clean sheet and did nothing wrong, open goal that was saved was kos out of position and monreal caught up the pitch too high, giroud has great ball skills, issue is his position on the pitch, watched the match again focused on giroud, he tends to camp behind the defender from the ball, this only works when you have the quickness to break, he does nt, I have screen shots where ozil is 25 yrds farther up the pitch then giroud, thisis the problem, he is rendered useless unless ozil holds up, and thats not ozils strength, thus very few sog's from giroud on the run, when giroud gets lucky w space in front of the defender, he is lethal, but needs to get into that space,

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

For example, if you're focused on winning league as your goal, and you work really hard — and so does everyone on your team — and things go wrong and you wind up finishing sixth, you might start thinking that working hard doesn't pay off and isn't important.

its ok being annoyed but i think admins must focus on things ppl do nt know, rather than posting rumors from mirror and metro who are wrong 99 % of the time.

Don't get me wrong, he is not the only one, the EPL has plenty of those, but the focus is on our team Arsenal.

never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

How often after a defeat we listen to Arsene Wenger talk about focusing on the next game, well he had three days to focus on what went wrong in the cup final and more than enough time to correct it, yet against the same opposition the same result, but Arsene Wegner continues to talk about players lacking in confidence, the mental strenght and all the usual excuses made by Arsene Wegner, so how does the all seeing all knowing wise one explain Wigan Athletic and Liverpool beating Man city, well my advise to Arsene Wegner is if he really understand the word focus he would F --- k — Of ---- Cause — U ---- S --- t. WEGNER OUT.

With the focus upon the 2018 and 2022 World Cups, Germany has been forced to deny it did anything wrong to win the right to...

Help your child to correct errors and mistakes by showing or demonstrating what he should do rather than focusing on what he did wrong.

If you keep the focus on what their comments do to you rather than trying to convince them that they're wrong or out of line, then you're likely to have a more productive conversation.

Focusing on all the things your child is doing wrong means you're overlooking all the things he's doing right.

Programs like FIND, which trains parent coaches to work with low - income, stressed parents, focus less on pointing out what parents do wrong and more on what parents do right, in order to nudge parents toward behaviors that help their kids.