Multibillion -
dollar arbitration disputes abounded, as did comprehensive corruption investigation work.
Not exact matches
In addition to the investigation and contract analysis, Michael has negotiated settlements of numerous multi-million
dollar reinsurance claims and has also participated as coverage counsel in numerous
dispute resolution proceedings including reinsurance
arbitrations and litigation.
Represented an independent oil and gas producers in a multi-million
dollar arbitration against drilling companies in commercial transaction
disputes.
Served as trial or
arbitration counsel in a variety of commercial matters, including a cases involving the voiding of a million -
dollar note, a breach of contract case relating to a multi-million
dollar insurance coverage
dispute arising from a catastrophic loss, and a shareholder
dispute centering on the interpretation of ten complex operating, management, business, and employment / non-compete agreements.
His experience includes pre-trial litigation, trials and appeals in state and federal courts, judicial and private
arbitration, mediation and administrative proceedings in matters ranging in size upwards of multi-million
dollar disputes.
In addition to having been instructed in major
arbitrations, such as the Bermudan - based
arbitration relating to the reinsurance of Arthur Andersen following the collapse of Enron and WorldCom, and Elektrim SA's long running
dispute with Vivendi Universal over Polish telecommunications, he has particular expertise in relation to inter relief applications to the Court in relation to heavy
arbitrations such as ETI Euro Telecom V Republic of Bolivia [2008](no pre-emptive relief in aid of an ICSID
arbitration); Elektrim SA v Vivendi [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep 693 (s. 68 of AA 1996 and awards obtained by fraud); Elektrim v Vivendi [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8 (injunction to restrain
arbitration continuing) Telenor East Holding II AS v Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd (multi-billion
dollar shareholder
dispute — interim injunction under s. 44 of the AA 1996); Steadfast v Baker Hughes (s. 9 (3) step in the action preventing a stay in favour of
arbitration) and enforcement of arbitral awards (Yukos v Rosneft: US$ 500m and Yukos v Russian Federation US$ 50 billion.
Dispute over non-renewal of contract between Japanese automaker and American distributor (international arbitration proceeding with an amount in dispute of about $ 14.163 million dollars — 1.47 billion JPY at an exchange rate of 104 JPY t
Dispute over non-renewal of contract between Japanese automaker and American distributor (international
arbitration proceeding with an amount in
dispute of about $ 14.163 million dollars — 1.47 billion JPY at an exchange rate of 104 JPY t
dispute of about $ 14.163 million
dollars — 1.47 billion JPY at an exchange rate of 104 JPY to USD).
Dispute over architect's fee between Japanese trading company and American architect (international arbitration proceeding with an amount in dispute of about $ 21.26 million dollars — approx. 2.2 billion JPY at an exchange rate of 104 JPY t
Dispute over architect's fee between Japanese trading company and American architect (international
arbitration proceeding with an amount in
dispute of about $ 21.26 million dollars — approx. 2.2 billion JPY at an exchange rate of 104 JPY t
dispute of about $ 21.26 million
dollars — approx. 2.2 billion JPY at an exchange rate of 104 JPY to USD).
Confidential LCIA
arbitration (2010): multi-million
dollar dispute raising issues as to the ability of a party to rely on an entire agreement clause where the conduct of that party gives rise to an estoppel and / or waiver.
Representing innovative litigation finance platform in
dispute pending in state district court that arose between attorney borrowers and lender over on - platform transaction, and in multi-million
dollar dispute pending in commercial
arbitration with lender over collapsed business relationship.
A number of these
disputes have involved claims in excess of a billion
dollars and many of these claims are the largest of their type to have been brought in
arbitration.
In the world of international
arbitration, cases come in all shapes and sizes, from billion -
dollar blowouts with big geopolitical consequences to minor dustups involving commercial
disputes, regional backwaters or arcane treaties.
Confidential (2015): representing buyers and managers in relation to a number of significant and complex multi-million
dollar shipbuilding
disputes with foreign shipyard arising under
arbitration clauses providing for an expedited procedure.
Alan has prosecuted and defended numerous high - profile cases, and has obtained several multimillion
dollar arbitration awards, judgments and settlements in high stakes business
disputes throughout the United States.
LCIA
arbitration (confidential)(2010): multi-million
dollar dispute raising issues as to the ability of a party to rely on an entire agreement clause where the conduct of that party gives rise to an estoppel and / or waiver.
This was the largest PPP
dispute arising out of Korea and the consortium was awarded over $ 750 million
dollars in two
arbitration proceedings concluded within 18 months of filing the Request for
Arbitration.
Wole has advised and managed many multi-million
dollar arbitral
disputes including a coal mining contractor pricing review
arbitration worth in excess of US$ 350m.
Re LMAA
arbitrations (2011, confidential, ongoing): multi-million
dollar disputes under a string of long term charterparties arising out of premature termination, related world wide freezing injunctions.
Represented an international construction company in a SIAC
arbitration governed by Korean law with the seat of
arbitration in Singapore relating to a multi-million
dollar joint venture
dispute.
Successfully represented large defense contractor in international
arbitration to resolve a multimillion -
dollar dispute with a Taiwanese defense contractor under UNCITRAL procedures
Confidential LCIA
Arbitration: 4 different multi-million
dollar disputes which are currently in the advisory stages (all confidential) concerning various aspects of the relationship between the parties concerning distribution of GDS services in various territories which are subject to LCIA
arbitration.