Indonesia to revoke palm oil concession licenses under forest deal (05/31/2010) Indonesia will revoke existing forestry licenses to cut down natural forests under the billion
dollar deal climate deal signed with Norway last week, reports Reuters.
Not exact matches
This includes
deals like the one - sided Paris
climate accord, where the United States pays billions of
dollars while China, Russia and India have contributed and will contribute nothing.
Wouldn't it have been great if Virginians had been able to use those millions of
dollars productively to
deal with the already very real impacts of
climate change rather than to bury their heads in the sands because this attorney general wanted to not only discredit us, but send a message to all scientists in Virginia that... if you too decide to talk about the impacts of
climate change then you too can be subject to a subpoena from the attorney general?
Adding to concerns, a forestry official who helped negotiate the Norway
deal and represented Indonesia at global
climate talks in 2009 is a suspect in a multi-million
dollar corruption case.
Because after 30 years, tens of billions of
dollars, as much computing power as it is technically possible to give you and a great
deal of belief in «just another 100 million
dollars and all will be well», there is absolutely no evidence that you have ever successfully predicted anything at all about
climate.
«We think 65 billion
dollars are needed to
deal with the effects of
climate change on a continental scale.
Developing countries set out trillion -
dollar investment asks in their submissions to the UN ahead of a global
climate deal to be finalised in Paris this December.
The startling admission shows once again that United Nations theories and
climate models are wildly inaccurate at best, experts say, meaning multi-trillion
dollar schemes to
deal with alleged human - caused «
climate change» are at the very least severely misguided.
Petroleum and coal companies are allowed to sell their products which, when consumed, cause untold trillions of
dollars in costs in human health and environmental damage, and governments pay those costs in the form of medical benefits, and eventually measures to
deal with the effects of global
climate change.
The
deal is voluntary, and unlike the UN
climate negotiations has not prompted ten billion
dollars of cash.
It's now widely believed that the U.S. never wanted a legally binding
climate deal in Copenhagen at all — even though the Democrats controlled the Congress at the time and may have been able to successfully ratify the treaty — opting instead for a mostly empty pledge of billions of
dollars in aid to developing nations.
If a global
climate deal makes good on that pledge, those coal, oil and gas reserves could become worthless, potentially losing investors trillions of
dollars.