The public, via taxation, provides billions of
dollars for climate research.
Not exact matches
But they also are very pleased that Lucas, as the chair of the House Agriculture Committee, sponsored the 2014 Agriculture bill, which appropriated over a billion
dollars for scientific
research on the impact of
climate change on farming.
In fact we are not spending billions of
dollars a year on
climate research for scientific reasons, but rather
for policy reasons.
Indeed, most of the improvements in our
climate monitoring abilities occurred after the public interest in «global warming» began in the late 1980s, i.e., when governments began increasing funding
for climate research with multi-billion dollar research programmes such as the U.S. Global Change Research
research with multi-billion
dollar research programmes such as the U.S. Global Change Research
research programmes such as the U.S. Global Change
Research Research Program.
But digging this information takes time, and as Tony B writes, there are no big
research grants
for this type of work, as opposed to the paleo stuff, which is supported by the multi-billion
dollar big business called «
climate change».
Brulle and Roberts blamed the great conspiracy
for «decades of inaction on
climate change» and claimed that «Scholarly
research shows that these institutes received nearly a billion
dollars in funding to promulgate a series of neoliberal causes, including misinformation on the causes and impacts of
climate change.»
The current global warming industry generates billions of
dollars annually
for research, which helps to explain why 36 percent consider
climate scientists»
research findings as being influenced by a desire to «advance their careers.»
Jagadish Shukla, a George Mason University
climate professor with a rare aptitude
for snaffling millions of
dollars in taxpayer funded grants but rather less of a skill — you suspect — when it comes to producing
research of any damn use to anyone.
«The UK government gave $ 11 million
dollars to the Centre
for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) in exchange
for research that the organization reportedly never actually did.
«Take some of your millions of
dollars you have
for climate research and hire yourselves a competent publicist.
I would gladly exchange some of the billions of
dollars invested in
research for climate data collection network stability.
Millions of
dollars spent on scientific
research comes to the same conclusions our elders warned us of years ago — that «Combatting
climate change is an urgent common challenge
for the international community and requires immediate global action».
New WRI
research shows that a carbon price could provide billions of
dollars a year
for coal communities in West Virginia and other states, while also curbing air pollution and
climate change.
«The science says that spending precious
dollars for climate change mitigation on forestry is high - risk:» I disagree, and Spending on atmospheric & Biospheric
research is imperative.
As
for the million
dollar question — whether
climate change is making tornados more dangerous — I'll turn that one over to Dr. Kevin Trenberth, senior scientist at the National Center
for Atmospheric
Research Global.
«But also the uncomfortable reality —
for climate modellers — that finite
research dollars invested in ever more sophisticated
climate models offer very little marginal benefit to decision makers.»
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 2017 has requested, as a part of their requested $ 5.8 billion
dollar budget, $ 520 million
for the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
Research (OAR) an increase of $ 30.7 million from last years budget
for their 33 in house
climate scientists and whomever else they throw money to.