Not exact matches
But there are reports that Senate leaders are close to a deal on a two - year budget that would boost
defense spending and
spending on
domestic programs the Democrats want.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes,
domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24)
spending by the U.S. and other governments on
defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and
domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
They also agreed then to a goal of moving «toward»
spending 2 % of their gross
domestic product on their own
defense by 2024.
While China's
domestic security
spending outstrips
defense spending, though the government stopped providing exact figures four years ago, it has also struggled with some pointed intelligence failures.
A
spending spree on mostly U.S. - made equipment means Japan's
defense planners are being forced to curtail
domestic programs that would help local
defense contractors such as Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries maintain their military industrial base.
The new federal budget plan matters and is increasing
defense and nondefense
spending to the tune of $ 300 billion, which would put the fiscal year 2019 deficit at over $ 1 trillion or 6 % of gross
domestic product (GDP).
The bill also calls for the lifting of limits on federal
spending, which would allow the repeating increases in
defense and
domestic budgets.
But the more libertarian, limited - government wing of the party generally prioritizes cutting
domestic spending over boosting
defense spending, and has pushed back against the February deal as allowing profligacy on all fronts.
Earlier on Tuesday, there appeared to be two possible outcomes: The Senate would either sign off on the $ 659.2 billion increase in
defense spending and add in a parallel increase in
domestic spending, or lawmakers would strip the measure of all extra
defense spending and send yet another «simple» stopgap bill back to the House.
Congress set the current funding deadline of Friday, March 23, in early February, when party leaders arrived at an agreement to boost
domestic spending by $ 128 billion and
defense spending by $ 160 billion over two years.
Two months before the presidential election of 2000, the PNAC unipolarists issued a position paper titled «Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century» that spelled out the particulars of a global empire strategy: repudiate the ABM treaty, build a global missile
defense system, increase
defense spending by $ 20 billion per year to 3.8 percent of gross
domestic product, and reinvent the U.S. military to meet expanded obligations throughout the world.
Most countries would want to give all their
defense contracts to
domestic suppliers, both to
spend the money in the
domestic industry and to retain strategic independence.
Someone else might put
domestic and
defense spending in conflict and favor one over the other.
However, two economic measures - percentage of and per capita gross
domestic product
spent on
defense - are among those most commonly used.
Both plans also contain significant reductions in funding for
domestic non-entitlement (also known as «discretionary») programs and significant increases in
defense spending.
The temporary
spending agreement took the air out of the balloon of heightening tension that the government would grind to a halt over differences on
defense and
domestic spending, border security and the future of youthful immigrant «Dreamers.»
President Trump will instruct federal agencies today to assemble a budget for the coming fiscal year that includes sharp increases in
Defense Department
spending and drastic enough cuts to
domestic agencies that he can keep his promise to leave Social Security and Medicare alone.
The president will lay out a budget plan with big increases in
defense spending offset by large cuts in
domestic programs — exactly, his budget director told reporters, what Trump promised to do on the campaign trail.
Washington (CNN)- A top Senate Democrat bluntly warned Monday that her party is prepared to let all the Bush - era tax cuts expire and automatic
spending cuts to
defense and
domestic programs take place at the beginning of next year unless Republicans agree to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans.
Republican members of Indiana's Congressional Delegation split their votes on the latest budget deal which funds the government for the next two years, lifts the debt ceiling as well as increases
spending on
defense and
domestic programs.
For instance, the New York Democrat calls Ryan's proposed
spending cuts «totally unrealistic,» including the idea that discretionary
spending, including
defense, could be reduced to under 4 percent of gross
domestic product in 2050.
ELIZABETHTOWN — President Trump's budget blueprint calls for deep cuts in
domestic programming in favor of steep increases in
defense spending.
The sequester cuts, or series of across - the - board federal budget reductions, are split evenly between
domestic spending and
defense, and at least one New York Congressman is voicing concerns about the latter.
The proposed cuts signal President Trump's pledge to slash
domestic spending and boost the
defense budget.
The strategy continued into 2017, reports Elana Schor in Politico, when «All but four of the Senate's 48 Democrats [in December] warned congressional GOP leaders against pursuing a government funding plan that would boost
defense spending for the rest of the fiscal year while leaving
domestic priorities at current levels... Some Senate Democrats began pushing back... as House conservatives pitched Republican leaders on a full - year hike for the Pentagon paired with a continuing resolution for
domestic programs.»
However, Mason notes, as soon as Congress struck a 2 - year deal with the president to boost
domestic and
defense spending by some $ 300 billion, the White House reversed course and proposed holding the Office of Science budget flat.
The Trump administration had proposed cutting NIH's budget by about $ 1 billion this year, as part of a proposal to pay for
defense spending increases by cutting
domestic programs.
January 29, 2015 • The across - the - board
spending cuts, known as the sequester, reduced
defense and
domestic budgets by hundreds of millions each.
If the super committee doesn't have an agreement by November 23, it will trigger $ 1.2 trillion in automatic across - the - board cuts — half from
defense, the other half from
domestic spending like education — to take effect in 2013.
The Introduction of Any Evidence Regarding Marital Problems or
Domestic Violence involving Plaintiff's prior Marriage
Defense counsel
spent time in deposition asking Plaintiff about her prior marital discord.