Not exact matches
LONDON (Reuters)- Online selling and weak controls on
domestic ivory sales
in Japan are spurring illegal international
trade in elephant tusks and contributing to a steep rise
in poaching, activists said on Tuesday.
Thailand currently bans the sale of
ivory from wild elephants but permits the
trade in ivory from captive
domestic elephants.
On Wednesday, Hong Kong government announced that its three - step plan to phase out
domestic ivory trade by the end of 2021 was approved by the Chief Executive
in Council.
EIA president Allan Thornton said: «AEON's decision to end all
ivory sales
in its malls sends a strong signal to the people of Japan that
domestic ivory trade in Japan must end to help protect Africa's elephants.»
Esmond — with his indefatigable energy and efforts — made an indelible and tangible impact
in that the Government of China indeed did act to fulfill its commitments to ban
domestic ivory trade.
In December 2016, in no small part due to information Esmond brought to light, the Government of China announced it would ban domestic ivory trade by January 1st, 201
In December 2016,
in no small part due to information Esmond brought to light, the Government of China announced it would ban domestic ivory trade by January 1st, 201
in no small part due to information Esmond brought to light, the Government of China announced it would ban
domestic ivory trade by January 1st, 2018.
We are firm
in our resolve to combat all
trade in elephant
ivory: illegal and legal, international and
domestic.
The resolution calls for the closure of
domestic ivory markets
in countries with legal markets linked to illegal
trade or poaching.
• Learn more about Rakuten's decision to cease
ivory sales by reading EIA's press release and associated blog post • Check out Blood e-Commerce, our 2014 report on Rakuten's
ivory sales • Read about Japan's
domestic ivory market and how it contributes to elephant poaching and illegal
trade in our two recent reports: Japan's Illegal Ivory Trade (2015) and The Dirty Secrets of Japan's Illegal Ivory Trade (
trade in our two recent reports: Japan's Illegal
Ivory Trade (2015) and The Dirty Secrets of Japan's Illegal Ivory Trade (
Trade (2015) and The Dirty Secrets of Japan's Illegal
Ivory Trade (
Trade (2016)
Despite a landmark decision at CITES CoP17
in 2016 to close down
domestic ivory markets, the Government of Japan has refused to ban
ivory sales or acknowledge the role Japan plays
in the illegal
ivory trade and poaching of elephants.
I'm interested to see that WWF and TRAFFIC have welcomed China and the USA's pledge to end
trade and
domestic sale of
ivory «
in a timely manner».
The Secretariat of CITES engaged ELI and its partners to analyze the regulatory frameworks governing the
domestic trade of elephant
ivory in nine key countries, including China, the European Union, Japan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, United States, and Vietnam.
«The Government of Japan is not only promoting
trade in illegal
ivory to sustain its
ivory traders, but is also sabotaging international efforts to ban the
domestic ivory trade by China and other nations,» said EIA president Allan Thornton.
«To show it is serious about stopping its illegal
ivory trade problem, Japan needs to cease all registration of whole tusks immediately as a step
in closing its
domestic ivory market,» said Grabiel.
WASHINGTON, DC - The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) is calling for the closure of Japan's
domestic ivory market after new evidence of illegal
trade in ivory tusks was linked to the Ministry of Environment's tusk registration scheme.
10.10 and its implications for Japan's
domestic ivory market that finds Japan's
ivory market does
in fact contribute to poaching and illegal
trade and thus is not exempt from the 2016 ban on
domestic elephant
ivory markets.
In 2016 at CITES CoP17, Parties unanimously approved amendments to Resolution Conf.10.10 (Rev. CoP17), «Trade in elephant specimens,» that included recommending urgently closing domestic ivory markets that contribute to poaching or illegal trad
In 2016 at CITES CoP17, Parties unanimously approved amendments to Resolution Conf.10.10 (Rev. CoP17), «
Trade in elephant specimens,» that included recommending urgently closing domestic ivory markets that contribute to poaching or illegal t
Trade in elephant specimens,» that included recommending urgently closing domestic ivory markets that contribute to poaching or illegal trad
in elephant specimens,» that included recommending urgently closing
domestic ivory markets that contribute to poaching or illegal
tradetrade.
Last October 180 member nations of the Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) agreed unanimously to close domestic ivory markets where they contribute to illegal trade or poac
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) agreed unanimously to close
domestic ivory markets where they contribute to illegal
trade or poac
trade or poaching.
EIA hopes that parallel
domestic commercial
ivory trade bans are prioritized
in order to protect elephants.
Often represented by pro-
ivory trade voices as being the best - controlled
ivory trade in Asia, Japan's
domestic ivory trade system is
in reality riddled with loopholes that can be used to launder illegal
ivory.
«We have to take down the criminal syndicates behind the
trade in elephant
ivory and rhino horn, and enact a worldwide ban on all
trade in ivory and rhino horn including
domestic trade.
At the Clinton Global Initiative's annual meeting
in September, leaders from seven African elephant range states committed or recommitted to banning
ivory imports, exports and
domestic trade in their countries.
If China were to ban its
domestic commercial
ivory trade in a timely fashion, it would be a critically important contribution towards eliminating the illegal
ivory trade and reducing the slaughter of Africa's elephants.
Thailand's Prime Minister repeated claims made
in the past pledging to end the
domestic ivory trade, yet there is no timeline for this ban and the world's elephants become increasingly endangered while policy change languishes.
As a key element of these efforts to reduce demand, disrupt the
trade, and set a global example, we urge the United States to implement a moratorium on
domestic ivory trade — an important action that would build upon the messages of the
ivory crush and close loopholes
in U.S
domestic legislation that allow for illicit
trade to continue.
«While the issue of whether sales should be allowed to proceed or not has dominated much of the discussions here
in Qatar, WWF and TRAFFIC believe the key driving force behind the ongoing elephant poaching is the continued existence of illegal
domestic ivory markets across parts of Africa and Asia,» said Steven Broad, executive director of TRAFFIC, the wildlife
trade monitoring network of WWF and International Union for Conservation of Nature, IUCN.