In order for communication to be protected by litigation privilege, there must be current litigation or a reasonable contemplation of litigation and
the dominant purpose of the communication must be for use in the current or contemplated litigation.
This privilege applies to all communications that are made in the course of or in contemplation of litigation where
the dominant purpose of the communication is the pending litigation.
Not exact matches
Looking primarily to models based on quantitative research methodologies to provide a clear direction for policy in regulating media and violence can also distract policy makers from coming to grips with other difficult but more important value questions that impinge on the issue
of media and violence, such as the
purpose of broadcasting, issues
of ownership and control
of media, the international context
of Australian media, the
dominant economic nature
of most
of Australia's social
communications, the distinctive ways in which the media reproduce and reconstruct myths and symbols
of violence from within the culture, and how audiences use and respond to media myths and symbols.
It covers confidential
communications between a lawyer and his or her client, or a lawyer or client and a third party (such as a witness
of fact, an expert witness or a consultant) where the
dominant purpose is advising on, or obtaining evidence in relation to, actual or contemplated litigation.
Legal advice privilege arises over confidential
communications between lawyer and client that are created for the sole or
dominant purpose of giving or seeking legal advice, even if there is no actual or potential litigation.
The
dominant purpose for the
communication or the production
of the relevant document must have been either to obtain information or advice in connection with the litigation or to conduct or assist in the conduct
of it.
Legal professional privilege may be claimed over any
communication between a client and their lawyer seeking or giving legal advice and over
communications between a lawyer and a third party if litigation was in contemplation and the document or
communication was created for the
dominant purpose of litigation.
Litigation privilege (which was expressly not considered in the Walter Lilly case) is slightly different in that it applies to
communications both between a lawyer and client, and between either the lawyer, the client and a third party, made for the
dominant purpose of litigation where litigation is pending, reasonably contemplated or existing.
Litigation privilege will only apply if litigation is reasonably contemplated when the investigation begins, and any
communication or document is created for the
dominant purpose of that litigation.
Documents created for the
purposes of preparing for, or conducting, adversarial proceedings are privileged if this was their
dominant purpose and the document is a confidential
communication between the lawyer and client, or either and a third party such as a compliance consultant, provided that adversarial proceedings were in reasonable contemplation
of the party.
Litigation privilege protects confidential
communications by clients or solicitors to a third party from the point that litigation is in contemplation, provided such
communications are for the
dominant purpose of the litigation.
The
communications are made with the sole or
dominant purpose of conducting that anticipated litigation
The relevant
communication or document is made or created with the sole or
dominant purpose of conducting that litigation; and
For a
communication to be subject to litigation privilege, it must have been made for the
dominant purpose of being used in aid
of, or obtaining, legal advice from a lawyer about actual or anticipated litigation.
litigation privilege, for
communications between lawyers and their clients, or either
of them and a third party, for the
dominant purpose of seeking or obtaining legal advice, or preparing a party's case, in relation to contemplated litigation.
We now understand that confidential
communications with third parties for the
dominant purpose of litigation are generally protected by litigation privilege but not by solicitor - client privilege [ii].