[58] For litigation privilege to apply, however,
the dominant purpose of the interviews must be in reasonable contemplation of litigation.
Not exact matches
But even if this aspect
of the judgment is successfully appealed, the more intractable challenge facing companies will be to show that documents created during an internal investigation — such as
interview records — were created for the «
dominant purpose»
of future litigation.
The position in relation to
interviews with third parties is less clear but an
interview with a genuine third party is unlikely to attract legal advice privilege, whereas all
interviews conducted for the
dominant purpose of anticipated litigation ought to attract litigation privilege.