Which got me thinking about how
the dominant religious culture, even the dominant expression of Christianity and church that we are exposed to, attempts to set the rule.
Not exact matches
There have been concerted efforts in fundamentalist circles to become the
dominant religious voice in our military as a means of ensuring their «victory» in a «
culture war.»
As Todd Brenneman argues in his recent book, Homespun Gospel: The Triumph of Sentimentality in Contemporary American Evangelicalism, sentimentality may be a defining characteristic of
religious life for many Americans, and so most readers in the
dominant Evangelical
culture, outside a few hip and urban churches, are more likely to encounter the treacly poetry of Ruth Bell Graham than the spiritually searing work of R. S. Thomas or T. S. Eliot.
One reason, I suspect, is a reflexive hostility to fundamentalists and socially conservative Catholics whose
religious way of life is most likely to come into conflict with the
dominant strains of our liberal secular
culture.
In these last years, scarred by AIDS, by the
dominant culture of greed and violence, and by personal loss and pain, I have come to see more distinctly the vital link between the healing process (traditionally the prerogative of
religious and medical traditions) and the work of liberation (assumed to be the business of revolutionary movements for justice).
In these last years scarred by AIDS, by the
dominant culture of greed and violence, and by personal loss and pain, the author has come to see more distinctly the vital link between the healing process (traditionally the prerogative of
religious and medical traditions) and the work of liberation (assumed to be the business of revolutionary movements for justice).
The
dominant liberal utilitarian
culture has been challenged many times but perhaps never by such an array of political and
religious alternatives.
The contact with Zoroastrianism, which was the
dominant religion within the Achaemenid Empire founded by Cyrus the Great, as well as Hellenic thought led to incorporation of
religious ideas from those
cultures into Judaism, including the development of notions of an immaterial and immortal soul distinct from the body and a moralized afterlife.
Of course through such coexistence for long periods, there developed symbiotic interpretations of religions and cultural and social values, creating not one but several composite
cultures and syncretic
religious trends in different regions of the country in different periods of its history, with one or other
religious value or cultural system having
dominant influence.
8 Michael Moffatt strengthens and reinforces a similar perspective in his interpretation of religion and
culture of the Pbraiyars He claims that the cultural and
religious system of the Untouchables is «not detached or alienated from the «rationalization» of the system... [Thus, it] does not distinctively question or revalue the
dominant social order.»
It provided an ideological framework within which the many
religious communities of India as well as the plurality of linguistic caste and ethnic
cultures (in the formation of which one or other religions had played a
dominant role) could participate together with the adherents of secular ideologies like Liberalism and Socialism (which emerged in India in the framework of the impact of modern humanism of the West mediated through western power and English education).
The last suggestively argues that
dominant notions of «
religious freedom» in our political
culture have been shaped by Protestant individualism rather than by ecclesial Christianity, with the result of playing into the hands of secularist delusions about the autonomous self.
To which one must respond: the free exercise of intellect often does not extend to the
dominant religious centers of our
culture.
If it is the recurring patterns as presented on the major social forms of communication which are effective in the molding of
culture, greater attention needs to be given to the study of the
dominant patterns and images shown on
religious television programs and how these relate to other and traditional expressions of
religious faith.
Ultimately the people's resistance takes the form of new
religious / cultural movements, counter and alternative to the
dominant cultures and civilizations.
Analysing the isolated success of science in the other great
cultures of the world, he demonstrates how their long - term failures (or «stillbirths») were invariably connected to the
dominant philosophical or
religious mindset of the given
culture, especially the pervasive influence of eternal cycles and other tendencies towards fatalism.