Sentences with phrase «done at a higher valuation»

Girnar Software did not comment on whether the latest tranche of Series B funding, coming after about a year, was done at a higher valuation.

The key to this strategy is getting 5 people who form the social proof to help you get a bigger angel round done at a higher valuation by tons of industry insiders and thus offering the social proof you need attract great employees and ultimately venture capital investors.

Not exact matches

They came in with a product the Sharks didn't understand and tried to raise at a valuation higher than any other company to appear on Shark Tank ever had.

The last thing a founder wants is to push hard for a high valuation at the start, only to have the investors write the company off down the road because they don't have much to gain anymore.

«They are raising now at a higher valuation, but if you were to say «here is what the New York and San Francisco markets are really worth in full legal compliance» and then re-run the numbers — however they do it — I don't know that they are still that $ 30 billion company,» Tusk was quoted by CNBC as saying.

c) Don't raise money in a down market d) Raise a lot of money at high valuation when you can — even if you don't need the money.

If company goes on to raise the next round at a high valuation, the investor doesn't get any increase in that value.

Not only did the 2000 - 2002 bear market begin at the highest valuations on record, the recent bull market also began at the highest valuation recorded at the start of such a run.

As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already high price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet at higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weakness.

The question comes up: in a low rate world, with assets at historically high valuations, offering historically low returns, what should investors do?

I don't know what the NFL makes per year but I do know that their highest valued team is the Dallas Cowboys at $ 4.4 B, similar to the valuation of the UFC.

The report claims that Billy Beane, the founder of Moneyball is holding up the move as he has set a valuation of # 16.5 m of Janssen, a sum of money that does not match the highest bid Spurs have made, currently standing at # 15m.

By pretty much all measures, it offers access to higher growth rates at lower valuations than the average European stock fund does.

Historically, stocks do tend to trade at higher valuations when bond yields are lower.

It usually does, and longer - term measures like the Q - ratio and CAPE10 showed that valuations at the peak were severely high.

What it also says, though, is that Buffett continues to stick to what he does and knows best: buying high - quality companies at reasonable valuations.

At high valuations (high P / E10 and low 100E10 / P) and a 2 % withdrawal rate entry, there were a few instances which did not make it to year 30.

One of the ways we can do this is to take the median valuation of the companies in the S&P 500 Index (that is, the P / E at which half the stocks have higher valuations and half have lower valuations).

I have two questions: 1) Is there any argument that can be made for going with a stock allocation (I do not mean for those going with a high - dividend stock strategy, I am talking about those invested in a broad U.S. stock index) above 30 percent at today's valuations?

At 28.93, the «Shiller P / E ratio», which looks at company valuations over a longer - term, 10 - year period and adjusts for inflation, is at the highest level EVER, except for two occasions again... 2000 crash and do not want to say the 1929 crasAt 28.93, the «Shiller P / E ratio», which looks at company valuations over a longer - term, 10 - year period and adjusts for inflation, is at the highest level EVER, except for two occasions again... 2000 crash and do not want to say the 1929 crasat company valuations over a longer - term, 10 - year period and adjusts for inflation, is at the highest level EVER, except for two occasions again... 2000 crash and do not want to say the 1929 crasat the highest level EVER, except for two occasions again... 2000 crash and do not want to say the 1929 crash.

Value investing, to my mind, attempts to avoid the need for us to be a super forecaster because its fundamental aim is to buy businesses with valuations that impute very dark scenarios for the business and don't require said business to be able to incrementally deploy capital at high return rates for years into the difficult - to - forecast future to justify today's valuation.

Investors still cite the low costs of ETFs, but with the S&P 500 trading at a P / E ratio of 21x of higher, and earnings growth remaining persistently low, Narhi and Barr don't think equity valuations are worth the risk.

When you find companies growing at a rate greater than 13 %, and you conclude that there is a high likelihood of that growth continuing, a high valuation does not become a drag until you start paying over 35 - 40x earnings or so.

Even if they did, and you value the company at an appropriate P / E and / or P / S multiple based on those metrics, I'd be hard pressed to come up with a valuation much higher than today's market price.

At what point does excessive valuation turn quality into high risk investments?

I do agree this is a great company but valuations are through the roof with the current prices, neither the yield or the high PE justifies buying at these levels, I think we'll see 90s in the coming days.

There are a lot of bears waiting for rock bottom valuations, but the promised bargain valuations don't materialize because others invest at higher prices than you would, and the prices never get as low as you would like.

A Valuation - Informed Indexer would say that Buy - and - Hold performed well from 1982 through 1996 because stock prices were shockingly low at the start of that time - period and did not become dangerously high until the end of it.

But valuations do not only pull the SWR down at times of insanely high valuations, They also pull the SWR up at times of insanely low valuations.

My good friend Mike Piper has written an article («Investing Based on Market Valuation») at his Oblivious Investor blog exploring my finding that the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies get the numbers wildly wrong (promoted recently by my other good friend Todd Tresidder) and the research done by my other good friend Wade Pfau showing that Valuation - Informed Indexing has for the entire 140 years for which we have market data available to us provided far higher returns at greatly reduced risk.

Consequently, it does not necessarily follow that simply because a company is technically trading at a sound valuation, that it can generate a high future return.

Don't scoff at dividends when you are looking at capital gains as, the route through highest capital gains is often though valuation based on dividends.

Panics still happen but they don't hurt you much (panics always begin at times of insanely high prices and those following a Valuation - Informed Indexing strategy have little invested in stocks at such times).

I wrote my response in Do All Really Bad Price Drops Happen at Times of High Valuations?

However, with Welltower trading near all - time highs and many bond - like stocks trading at premium valuation multiples relative to history, short - term, more risk averse investors need to keep in mind the risk of a short to medium - term correction if rates do begin to rise and cause capital outflows for bond - like stocks.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term neveAt age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term neveat the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

So while some venture funds may be doing their best to inflate expectations and cash in on high valuations, that appears to be causing problems only at the small end of the startup pool — for now.

In doing so, perhaps the valuation can be higher, and I can get a bigger loan, as opposed to financing it at purchase?