Not exact matches
The site offers agreements where
people agree to lose a
certain amount of money if they don't accomplish a
certain goal
by a
certain date.
For instance, Smith said, some taxpayers don't realize that an elderly
person in their care could qualify as a dependent if they meet
certain conditions imposed
by the IRS.
For instance, Smith said, some taxpayers don't realize that an elderly
person in their care could qualify as a dependent if they meet
certain conditions imposed
by the Internal Revenue Service.
At this point, it looks like the «new and improved» Kinect will be bundled with the Xbox One, meaning that the console's price will inevitably be pushed upward
by something that
certain wrestlers and I — not to mention a whole bunch of
people — don't want or need.
Do this
by looking for ways to assign
people with unique talents and abilities to
certain situations where they would be a good fit and
by looking for common ground among
people and celebrating both the similarities and the differences.
Contract law, for example, provides that
by doing or saying
certain things
people can make binding agreements with one another that will be enforced
by judicial authorities in the event that one or more parties fail to follow through on the agreement.
I don't know why
people, in attempting to provide a refutation of an argument, consistently rebut arguments
by simply mentioning their nationality, as if being of a
certain nationality designates one as an expert in all matters concerning that nation and serves as sufficient qualification to denounce a valid opposition viewpoint.
Ways
do exist to avoid unwanted ad impressions
by preventing ads from appearing on
certain categories of pages, for
certain topics and keywords, and also to control the number of times a specific
person is exposed to your ads.
Atheists: I know many there are many
people that practice religion just
by fanaticism, I've seen many
people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems
by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them
by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing
certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
If a group of
people choose to live
by a
certain set of rules and actually don't mind, then their beliefs should be respected as we would want our beliefs to be accepted and respected as well.
Since when
did people of the Bronze Age were ever less intelligent or developed than we are today other than
certain technological advancements, which
by the way not even everything technologically speaking is necessarily more advance today it was say two thousand, three thousand, or even four thousand years ago, so I have no idea where you get that reasoning from.
The dispersal and re-emergence of Israel was not a self - fullfilling prophecy: the dispersal portion certainly was not, as the Romans
did not conquer Israel with the intent to fulfill Bible prophecy; at the time of the prophecy, there would have been no reason to believe that there would be
people who would try to Israel; the
people who founded modern Israel were, at least in the main, non-religious and were not trying to fulfill the Bible's prediction; and finally, considering the almost continual obstacles (wars) faced
by Israel since the day of its founding, sucess at restoring Israel was far from
certain.
First,
does the infusion occur in response to
certain conditions being antecedently met
by the
person?
It existed to fulfill
certain laws of God, and when it failed to
do this faithfully, it could be called to task
by the
people.
You can also buy any other book you want right then and there and you can get
people to sync up with your account to instantly share books and even interactively read
by highlighting
certain parts and writing notes in margins (which you can
do with real books too I know, but this way won't ruin the books themselves).
For, objectively speaking, according to his explanation a special act
does not express the
person's inner being any more than his other actions
do; it
does reveal his inner being more than other actions
do, but this is due to its being received in a
certain way
by others.
All of it is true and inspired
by God but there are
certain texts that things the
people did that were fitting for that given time frame and to that particular audience.
Once the shock wore off though, I realized that money abuses and issues, while endemic within churches, still only account for a portion of the many ways in which churches have wounded
people and thus there is undoubtedly plenty of
people in search of a safe place who
do not have any of the same issues that I have with linking money and spirituality, so really you were only excluding a
certain portion of
people from safety
by attaching a price tag to it, those for whom money issues are a sticking point and of course those who simply don't have the extra funds to commit.
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely
certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought
by most
people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned
by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method
does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas
do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it
does not exist in the «red brick» itself).
They know about the anti-Jewish polemics of
certain church fathers; about the forced baptisms, especially of children; about the church council decree that sanctioned the removal of such children from their parents; about a papal edict encouraging raids on Jewish synagogues
by the faithful; about the expulsion of all Jews from a country like Spain; about Luther's hate language directed against Jews when they
did not convert according to his timetable; about the prohibition against Jews living in Calvin's Geneva; and about all the cruelties Christians have felt justified in perpetrating against the
people they called «Christ - killers.»
Its an interesting and concerning that
people can and
do live in information silos (including me) and are kept their
by leaders of institutional church who want them to think in
certain ways like you must come to sunday church and made to feel guilty if they
do nt.
Just as
persons under a
certain age are not allowed to drink, drive, or vote, the sale of X-rated videos to children should be forbidden, either
by industry self - regulation or, if this
does not work,
by law.
It happened just this week — a client assumed I'm Christian, and I very carefully
did NOT correct the perception because of the way atheists are perceived
by certain religious
people.
America I don't plan to let you rest until you live it out that all [
persons] are created equal and endowed
by their creator with
certain inalienable rights.
has it been
done before
by certain people yes but
does nt mean that there should be a bad name for all of them but if you
do honestly believe that it was all muslims fault then you are an ignorant
person, and that really sad.
It was
done by dogma; the dogma holds that
certain people are mere objects.
But lawyers and politicians long ago realized they could make a profit, you know,
by captivating part of the mind in
certain people who's minds didn't have good sense, and made them start believe all kinds of crazy things.
I don't think I have embarrassed many
people or distressed them
by what I've said other than
by the impact of
certain obscene words that soldiers use.
because I needed help.Long story short.I am a slow learner and need time to absorb info.I don't like to just touch subject matter here and there.I like to go chapter
by chapter and that takes to much time out of
peoples busy day.O well, God has all the time in the world, and I have till I die.because I was on the computer a
certain day, at a
certain time, looking for a
certain thing.
When he
does reach out to each one of us, it's an experience that can essentially be understood
by the
certain person and God (example if God bestows you the gift of faith, he approaches you in a way that only you will find it credible and also others who have a similar experience.
The Anglo - American idea... means that the party who
does not abide
by certain specific decrees emanating from a judicial body is a contumacious
person and may, as a rule, be held in contempt of court, fined and jailed... Now, this very concept of contempt simply
does not belong to the world of ideas of a Latin lawyer.
I'm talking about how an idea like religion tries to dictate its own version of morality to others
by declaring a
certain group of
people as being abominations... oh, but we still love you, you crazy little abomination you... so long as you
do only what we tell you is ok.
Some laymen may
do a job of befriending
by taking
certain people in trouble into their homes — the unwed mother, the youth who is away from home and in need of
certain boundaries, the mental hospital returnee.
There is also research to confuse
people which is often funded
by certain industries that don't want competition.
With interest growing in the Meat Free Monday campaign, Paul also points out that vegetarian cuisine needs to show what it can
do, not only to counter
certain false impressions, but to capitalise on the increasing numbers of
people doing their bit for the environment and animal welfare
by eating less meat.
I cook quite a lot
by instinct so it's kinda funny to me when
people ask why I
do things a
certain way.
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out
by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates...
by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional
people» to maintain a
certain standard then
does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can
do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how
does one deal with such an untenable situation...
do you simply shut - up and hope for the best,
do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them,
do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed,
do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence,
do you lower your expectations
by convincing yourself it could be worse or
do you stand up for what you believe in
by holding
people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
Don't you think Curry was a little tough on
certain people — such as Danny Ainge, Mike Tyson and Otis Wilson — whose actions were viewed
by many, including me, as just reactions?
For example, BRT spoke about how we need to teach men not to feel entitled to
certain things (like women's bodies) they don't have a right to, as well as not conditioning «famous»
people to believe they can get away with things
by idolizing them so much.
This study, co-authored
by Aner Tal and Adam Brumberg, seeks to determine why
people — mothers in particular — develop so - called «food fears» about
certain ingredients (such as sodium, fat, sugar, high fructose corn syrup, MSG and lean finely textured beef) and what the food industry and government can
do about it.
We know that there were councilors who were chosen
by lots who ran
certain districts / held
certain positions, but what
did these
people do on a day to day basis?
Economists distinguish a number of types of unemployment, however: cyclical unemployment is brought about
by the vagaries of the business cycle; structural unemployment is brought about
by changes in the economy or the labour market, when the jobs available
do not fit the workforce's skills; frictional unemployment is the phenomenon of
people being «between jobs»; and seasonal unemployment is linked to
certain types of seasonal jobs, such as farm work and construction.
Chemical weapons, like
certain other kinds of weapons are banned not because of
people killed
by them, but because of what they
do to the survivors.
Labour believed they could dominate two full days of the campaign with the non-dom proposal, but the Conservative campaign director, Lynton Crosby, countered with a trademark «dead cat» strategy — a tactic best summarised
by Boris Johnson as follows: «There is one thing that is absolutely
certain about throwing a dead cat on the dining room table — and I don't mean that
people will be outraged, alarmed, disgusted.
I mean, the elections could definitely be contested
by other
people... Also
certain regimes, like China, tolerate dissent to a
certain extent but
do not listen to them at all, thus are still authoritarian.
People and governments react to terrorism
by becoming more fearful of
certain subsections of the population, fearful to carry out actions they may previously have no problem in
doing (e.g. going to a concert, boarding a plane etc.) or fearful of the group itself i.e ISIS / Al - Qaeda.
«We have been
doing all we can in line with the understanding reached with
certain persons that are external, but deeeply concerned because this matter needs to be witnessed
by people from the international community,» he said
My colleagues and I, including Sen. Tkaczyk, will be studying this election and others to find ways to make
certain people who take the time to participate in the electoral process can
do so unfettered
by hyper technical barriers.»
«Now
people removed all that I said about the poor management of the economy and then made it look like I started
by talking about the resource locations of this thing and put it forward and changed
certain things to make me look like I was being a tribalist and it was bad, this is where I find
people very mischievous;... You take the whole thing out of context and make it look very tribalistic, so, I think, yes, it happened, newspapers reported something wrong and I think
people should be ashamed of themselves when they
do this kind of «cut and paste» to create that wrong impression in the system...» Mr Osafo Marfo clarified.
There's nothing dramatically new in it The policy reviews of the summer were supposed to end the fuzziness that there has been in recent years, there has been a lot of vague sort of skipping through daisies stuff from David Cameron and more recently a lot about what he doesn't want,
people though want to know what a government lead
by David Cameron will be like and they want a
certain amount of substance.