Sentences with phrase «done by individual lawyers»

In addition, the toolkit's checklists ensure regular reviews of all files are done by individual lawyers and / or staff.

Some can be done by individual lawyers, and others require changes at a firm level.

Not exact matches

Who we are as individuals is often determined by what we do: doctor, lawyer, butcher, baker, candlestick maker.

Arsenal has many fans from different walks of life, lawyers, accountants, even financiers and the average joe with lots of brilliant ideas, our spend on club merchandise, on tickets and so on does not have to go through the pockets of some greedy individuals who only pay us back with misery over and over again, let's borrow a leaf from Real Madrid and Barcelona by making use of new technologies to come together and take charge of our club even if remotely, this mini revolution begins now, it begins with YOU!

In our Office's experience from past investigations, there is a difference between having information available to those who explicitly seek it out directly from source websites for specific purposes (for example, a lawyer doing jurisprudential research in CanLII or a journalist seeking out past articles on a given issue), and, the same information being «stumbled upon» or «fished out» by a snooping friend, colleague, neighbor or other acquaintance through a simple query search by an individual's name.

The functions that such apps perform also vary widely: apps can help individuals find a lawyer, create their own legal documents, gather evidence against authorities (for example, record police encounters or track heating violations by landlords), do their own legal research or better understand court or tribunal processes.

It does so by providing factual data from millions of litigation records about the behavior and performance of law firms and individual lawyers — including data points like win rates, cases with resolutions, time to injunction, etc., in specific areas of law.

The barristers at Essex Court Chambers, as individual lawyers, may only act on a specific matter or case if instructed to do so by one of the following: a solicitor, a qualified foreign lawyer, or an authorised licensed access client who has been approved under the Bar Standards Board's Licensed Access Recognition Regulations.

A «living will» which is a «pull the plug» document that isn't customized to an individual's preferences (probably 95 % + done by lawyers are not customized anyway) through a service like LegalZoom is probably fine, although doing it yourself you don't get the same guidance about how to use it in practice and are more likely to screw up the formal execution of the document (e.g. not having the proper witnesses and notary observe the execution, or signing in the wrong place, etc.).

And then let them use social media the same way that successful boutiques and individual lawyers already do — by contributing substantive content on a discrete subject area, linking to relevant industry news from credible sources, and showing a human side to the firm and its lawyers.

The case study was obviously created by someone who does not know enough about wills law, but then it is easy to denigrate or even jettison a practice area one knows little about, does not practice in, derives no income from, and never receives the appreciative feedback from the individual, as opposed to corporate, clients who have been so well served at modest cost by the lawyers in that «expendable» area.

«Given the cost of opening a firm and building a client base, I am sure there are many lawyers who would be interested in hanging up their own shingle with the assistance of an ABS structure — it doesn't have to be a behemoth shareholder to make this possibility a reality — it could be a collection of individuals who have faith in the lawyer and want some form of security / ownership / return for the risk they are taking by supporting the set - up and initial operating costs of that lawyer.

However, while there will always be a need and a place for lawyers who do high - powered, high - prestige work at premium rates, it is clear that much of what lawyers now do can be done less expensively by other well - trained individuals and specialized companies.

It will do this firstly by facilitating the regulation of organizations (or entities) alongside individuals (lawyers and nonlawyers).

All users should be aware that: (1) any email or other internet communication sent to Clarke Child and Family Law via any link provided on this website does not create a lawyer - client relationship, this means that the information that you are sending is not protected by solicitor client privilege; and, (2) as any e-mail or other internet communication may not be secure, any confidential information relating to your individual situation should not be included, it should only be disclosed in a direct consultation.

[28] However, in Property Alliance Ltd v. Royal Bank of Scotland Plc, factual non-privileged information communicated by a lawyer to the «true client» (i.e., individuals within a corporate client entity authorised to obtain legal advice on that entity's behalf) to enable the client to take a fully informed decision as to what to do and what further advice to obtain, was considered privileged.

From lawyers, judges, and law professors to fellow software and various tech - based service providers, each individual who stopped by the PracticePanther booth was by no means just someone to whom we could explain our software (although we loved doing that!)

However, the committee noted that the exception set forth in Rule 7.4 (c) applies only to individual lawyers and not law firms, and thus «Rule 7.4 (c) does not provide that a law firm (as opposed to an individual lawyer) may claim recognition or certification as a specialist, and Rule 7.4 (a) would therefore prohibit such a claim by a firm.

For this reason, an individual who is charged with a DUI or a DWI, would do better being defended by a Emerson DWI lawyer, then they would by a marijuana distribution lawyer.

While there are a whole host of reasons why I dislike the practice of discounting fees — not least of which is that you lose brand quality (both at the individual lawyer and firm level) doing this, probably the best explanation of why this is both crazy and counter-intuitive for law firms to practice is explained by Stuart Dodds's «1 -3-4 Rule ``, namely that:

I actually don't think a law firm with more than a handful of lawyers really can blog, because blogging is by definition personal and can only really be performed at an individual, not a corporate level.

The «mergers» referenced in the recent report released by Altman Weil Inc. on law firm combinations had a tiny impact on the legal market overall, though in a few cases, we observed that they did have a significant impact on the individual lawyers involved.

And the privilege of having my own practice is I have the ability to carefully pick my cases and to give each client, every person who calls me individual attention so I can answer all of their questions and make sure that they feel and they know that they have the full attention of a lawyer, and that they're not being represented by investigators or other people who do not have the hands - on experience that I've acquired over my 15 years of practice here in Richmond, Virginia.

Similar functions to those of law firm research lawyers are also carried out by dedicated individuals in government departments, courts, tribunals, and other organizations; these persons are often referred to as advisory lawyers, counsel, or some other term conveying the same meaning — to provide advice to their colleagues rather than directly to external clients (although they may do that also).

Living Wills A «living will» which is a «pull the plug» document that isn't customized to an individual's preferences (probably 95 % + done by lawyers are not customized anyway) through a service like LegalZoom is probably fine, although doing it yourself you don't get the same guidance about how to use it in practice and are more likely to screw up the...