Sentences with phrase «done by other scientists»

«It will add to what is already being done by other scientists on the Roi Baudouin Ice Shelf, will bring a new data set for models and will make a significant additional contribution to research activities at the Princess Elisabeth Antarctica Station».

Not exact matches

PICI (pronounced «pie - sea»), as it's called by its member scientists, is doing something unprecedented in academic medicine: combining and coordinating the efforts of six of the top cancer immunology centers in the country — MD Anderson Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering, Penn Medicine, Stanford, UCLA, and UCSF — in order to greatly expand and, more important, to accelerate our understanding of why some immune - based treatments work miraculously in some patients and not at all in others.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

In advancing these theories they disregard factors universally admitted by all scientists — that in the initial period of the «birth» of the universe, conditions of temperature, atmospheric pressure, radioactivity, and a host of other catalytic factors were totally different than those existing presently, including the fact that we don't know how single atoms or their components would bind and consolidate, which involved totally unknown processes and variables, as single atoms behave far differently than conglomerations of atoms.

md2205 The basics of evolutionary biology are easy to find, as these others have indicated, but you really do have to get educated by actual scientists, it seems.

It must refuse the historical validity of «others» who do not share its privilege or ideology — such as Roman Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, «gender traitors,» scientists, and former abortionists hung by giant fish - hooks (from Amos?)

It is blatantly clear why scientists employed by the tobacco industry arrive at quite different conclusions on the relation of smoking and cancer than do others.

I wonder what these «scientists» did to help cure AIDS, Cancer and other diseases that plague us by posting inflammatory posts on a message board?

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

While some still object to cells being taken from animals and used by scientists to grow clean meat in laboratories — and some just don't like the idea of eating a «cultured» steak created by men and women in white coats — others see the lab - grown meat revolution as key to solving the environmental crisis linked to meat eating.

Inspired by Albert Einstein and others, Claude believes that the education of young scientists and health professionals must be bound by a social contract that safeguards their freedom to travel, associate, and communicate freely, but asks in return that they do no harm and direct their talents toward caring for all human beings and the earth we inhabit.

Hosting of New Scientist videos on websites by other means, including usage in any film, video or TV programme, requires permission from either New Scientist, our syndication agents, or the rights holder where New Scientist does not own the rights.

Next, although science may come closer to universality than any other human activity, there are distinct local variations, as scientists adapt to local constraints and approach science with ways of thinking that are influenced by local culture, and these different ways of doing science can teach us things.

The company does, however, actively recruit by attending conferences and other events where recruiters are likely to meet scientists.

Hattar and other scientists then set out to determine exactly what ipRGCs do by creating mirror images of Keeler's blind rodents.

Second, by comparing the number of faculty in the field to the number doing a postdoc — which besides being a training phase also serves as a holding pattern for scientists waiting and hoping for faculty jobs — we can get an idea of whether Ph.D. scientists have access to other career options they deem acceptable.

In recent years, scientists have confirmed a remarkable link between two kinds of objects that should, by all rights, have nothing to do with each other: black holes and strange metals.

Another characteristic that sets Szilágyi apart from most other scientists is that he is motivated to do well in science by a desire «to bring glory to God's name.»

Unlike filters made by other companies, these quarter - sized filters don't glow themselves, which allows scientists to pick out the faint virus spots from a dark background.

But a new study using software developed by Duke scientists hints that we should be paying closer attention to what the other omegas — namely, omega - 6 and omega - 7 — are doing to improve or worsen the disease.

It does the latter by creating a central, virtual place for biotech companies and young scientists to find each other.

While U.K. scientists have complained that some other countries have responded to the worldwide financial downturn by increasing research spending, Willetts says the United Kingdom has actually done something more long - lasting: «This is not a temporary stimulus package.

But on the other, the best way I can help them is by setting an example of what a scientist can be and do.

Some scientists believe the amygdala doesn't have its own discrete storage system for emotionally charged memories but rather marks memories created by other brain systems as being somehow emotionally significant.

What the scientists found confirmed their suspicions: Cars in congested traffic spent more time being overtaken by other cars than they did passing them.

An international research group led by scientists at Aarhus University, Denmark, has now found out why some patients respond to the treatment, while others do not.

Scientists do not yet know how the grid is generated by the neural networks in the entorhinal cortex, or how the overall map created by grid cells, place cells and other navigation cells is integrated to help animals to get from one place to the next.

«It is a difficult career so I would advise women in particular to make sure they really want it and are ready to make all the necessary sacrifices before starting,» warns Isabelle Mansuy, although Anu Suomalainen - Wartiovaara wants to «encourage young female scientists — as a mother of three — by saying that family and science do not exclude each other.

Led by Professor William Warren, the group developed a wireless virtual reality system to study a phenomenon that scientists don't yet understand: how pedestrians interact with each other and how those individual behaviors, in turn, generate patterns of crowd movement.

To get to this point, the sleuths had managed to succeed where other investigators had failed; they had figured out how to successfully extract high - quality DNA from ivory, and they had done so by picking up a few tips from orthodontists and forensic scientists.

The three other populations that the researchers studied are also losing genetic variation — and they didn't have much to begin with, because each was founded by a small number of Kapiti birds, the scientists report online today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

In the event that a user does not have their own samples for this training, they could use the system's database, which will include results left with open access by other scientists.

The committee asked its parent organization to do likewise after IAU said it was «profoundly concerned by the impact the recent U.S. executive order, and possible reactions to it from other countries, could have on international collaboration in astronomy and the mobility of scientists.»

I think you and others could do more to change attitudes in the U.S. on global warming by joining forces in putting pressure on NOAA administrators and NWS supervisors to educate the 5,500 meteorologists in 120 National Weather Service offices so the NWS scientists can help other government people and other meteorologists who enter people's private living rooms better understand climate change.

The research was done by MalariaGEN, an international network of scientists and clinicians spread across Africa, Asia and other malaria - endemic regions of the world, which is funded primarily by the Wellcome Trust.

The scientists analyzed Kepler - 32 ′ s structure, compared it with other planetary systems discovered by NASA's Kepler space telescope and sat down to do some math.

Also, as a scientist, having the support of the scientific cores, the purchasing, information technology, and editorial departments, and more, is a huge plus, especially for someone who has worked at other institutions where you have to do almost everything by yourself.

The scientists suggest women may defeat stereotypes about what females can do by working alongside other women.

Is there any coordination among those doing this, before papers get to publication, so you know what's being done by which group, and all the scientists are aware of each other's work so they, taken as a group, can nail down as many loose ends as possible?

This shocking realization is true, but contradicts the advice given by his mentors about having fun doing science; I predict he might later join many other university scientists who are dismayed and distressed with their disgusting job problems (see: «Why are University Scientists Increasingly Upset with scientists who are dismayed and distressed with their disgusting job problems (see: «Why are University Scientists Increasingly Upset with Scientists Increasingly Upset with Their Job?

As if the previous study wasn't impressive enough, other studied such as studied done by Norwegian scientists found a link between lentil consumption and a reduction in cancers of the upper digestive tract.

And I might add that the interesting thing about Dr. Campbell's work is that it HAS NOT been peer reviewed, and it lies in contention with several other studies done by equally esteemed and credentialed scientists, whose work actually HAS been peer reviewed.

I believe that Jaminet's diet can improve one's health, but if you want to go to the next frontier, to that frontier where it is possible to slow down the effects of aging and reverse to a great extent many of the chronic diseases of aging, as revealed by calorie restriction and other elegant studies being done by scientists around the world studying the biology of aging, such as Cynthia Kenyon, you will have to take the next step that my diet will take you to.

Now that their findings have been confirmed by other scientists, the medical community can no longer assume that natural progesterone promotes breast cancer like progestins do.

While she did suffer a traumatic experience — she and others who've had near - death experiences were held against their will by a mad scientist, Dr. Hunter Hap (Jason Isaacs), who is using them to research the afterlife — it isn't the trauma that is keeping her from speaking.

Compare what they and many others do, with this Goal Mission «RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.»

Why don't scientists and other experts contributing to the fifth assessment by the climate panel self organize and create a public Web portal?

I hope the time spent on RC — directly, and by attracting and putting forward other scientists to the foreground — is included with everything else Michael Mann does that's being acknowledged by the award.

Science will be discussed by the public, and many will want to know other scientists» views on particular topics; to say they must be at a level to understand the peer - reviewed literature to do so is elitist.

Watch the first 1 to 2 minutes section of the UP Stream Pt 4 doco / research prject specifically being directed at all Climate Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about thScientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about thscientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the science.