All the good works
done by religious organizations of all kinds (Christian and otherwise) might get a mention in a human interest story sometimes, but decades of this media treatment have skewed public perceptions of what faith is about.
Not exact matches
By denying certiorari, the Supreme Court let stand a 9th Circuit ruling that affirmed World Vision's right to fire employees who didn't share the
organization's
religious views.
You don't think that people can be brainwashed into a belief system with the more subtle indoctrination techniques used
by religious organizations and have it stick?
The FDA decision
does not resolve other controversial issues swirling around the pills, including the refusal of hospitals run
by religious organizations to offer them, of some pharmacies to stock them and of some antiabortion pharmacists to dispense them.
Moreover, the imbalance is accentuated
by the fact that 60 percent of Jews
do not belong or contribute to any Jewish
organizations,
religious or otherwise, whereas well over 60 percent of non-Jews are church members.
@Mark To be clear, I would see granting exemptions if the
organization was expressly
religious, like an actual church, but merely being guided
by the
religious principles of the founder simply doesn't justify preventing coverage to those within the
organization with different beliefs, atti.tudes, and morals.
Religious organizations were welcome as long as they were malleable: as long as their leaders didn't need to profess anything in particular; as long as they could be governed
by sheer democracy and adjust to popular mores or trends; as long as they didn't prioritize theological stability.»
We
do well to remember that the freedoms we tend to take for granted are, in disputes all around the country, being defended daily
by organizations such as the Rutherford Institute, the Christian Legal Society, the Catholic League for Civil and
Religious Liberty, Dean Kelley of New York and William Ball of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (each of whose prodigious energy is tantamount to that of an
organization).
I consider myself a christian, with
religious knowledge and general knowlege, however I
do not hold to a set of views dictated
by an organized religion, I believe the organized religions are where we have gone wrong, as someone pointed out earlier to most «
religious people» to question ones faith or
organization is wrong but that is exactly what the bible tells us to
do... test ALL things to see what is true.
I'm going to tell you a little about myself
by way of introduction and how I happened to get into the work that I
do - of working primarily with congregations and occasionally with other
religious organizations around issues of human differences.
I'm going to tell you a little about myself
by way of introduction and how I happened to get into the work that I
do — of working primarily with congregations and occasionally with other
religious organizations around issues of human differences.
My seminars have indicated to me that the
religious organizations that address the issue of alcohol and drug abuse usually are prodded to
do so
by one person who is convinced of the need and will not take No for an answer.
Religious organizations do not have to abide
by the free speech requirement.
«Although the memo
does not overturn the Obama executive order prohibiting sexual - orientation discrimination
by government contractors, it signals a hospitable attitude toward accommodating
religious - liberty objections
by religious organizations in the context of contracts or grants,» he said.
Most Americans assume that the separation of church and state is a fundamental principle deeply rooted in American constitutionalism; that the First Amendment was intended to ensure that government
does not involve itself with religion (and vice versa); and that contemporary debates over such vexing issues as school prayer, voucher programs, government funding of faith - based
organizations, and the rights of
religious minorities represent ongoing attempts to realize the separation intended
by the Founders and like - minded early Americans.
So not believing in a deity means someone can't objectively critique the work
done by a charitable
organization because it is
religious?
Concern about potential peril resulting from involvement of the courts in religion
did not prevent every state in this country from rejecting the claimed denial of responsibility for injuries inflicted in hospitals operated
by religious organizations.
If
religious institutions are so keen on unionizing workers why don't they start
by unionizing the workers that work for their various
organizations and affiliated institutions (churches, schools, hospitals, etc...)?
The blatant hypocrisy of these
religious and quasi-
religious organizations, that want to impose rules and laws on other industries they don't often want applied to themselves and who benefit from a number of labor law and tax «exclusions» is fully detailed in the excellent 5 part series «In God's Name»
by Diana B. Henriques that ran in October of 2006 in the New York Times:
While it
did not deem scholarship tax credits generally unconstitutional, the decision, if not overturned on appeal, will prevent
religious organizations from participating in similar initiatives nationwide — including a parallel program for corporate donations upheld
by an Arizona appellate court just weeks earlier.
In particular, the study found severe accountability problems with both programs, most notably: they
do not serve students in rural areas where there were virtually no private schools or scholarship
organizations (SOs) present; they fund primarily
religious schools, which are not required to be accredited or adhere to the same standards for curricula as public schools; they
do not require the same testing requirements as public schools, making it impossible to gauge student achievement; and they
do not require reporting
by schools or SOs.
Begin searching for your pet's new home within your networks: Your workplace, community association,
religious organization, neighborhood, or any other group you are affiliated with; you can
do this
by advertising in an internal newsletter, sending out a mass email, or posting flyers with a description and photos of your pet.
The Divisional Court
did not agree with the Tribunal's approach to the interpretation of the second requirement in s. 24 (1)(a)-- namely, that Christian Horizons demonstrate that it is a «
religious...
organization that is primarily engaged in serving the interests of persons identified
by their... creed, or gives preference in employment to, persons similarly identified».