Sentences with phrase «done by statisticians»

«The physician gets a printout of the main results,» Nissen says, «but the actual analysis itself is done by statisticians within the companies.»

The pioneering work on «robust statistics,» or statistical methods that can tolerate corrupted data, was done by statisticians, but both new papers come from groups of computer scientists.

Not exact matches

«The irony of Chervenak and colleagues who are leading the anti-home birth crusade is that by polarizing the issue, no one can have a reasonable discussion to try and figure how to do this best,» says Eugene Declercq, a Boston University School of Public Health professor and a CDC statistician.

The randomisation was done by the study statisticians who had no involvement in enrolment or follow - up of participants

He did not demonstrate any stronger knowledge on crime fighting and public safety, beginning by stating that «statisticians will tell you crime is down, but read the fine print.»

At the University of Illinois Urbana — Champaign, political statistician Wendy Tam Cho has designed algorithms to draw district maps that use the criteria mandated by state law, but do not include partisan information such as an area's voting history.

«The international community seems to have developed a terrible Congo - fatigue, where deaths and suffering, even on the enormous scale reported by statisticians, somehow don't register.

Although statisticians like to measure risk by standard deviation, I don't think this is a very relevant guide to the way human beings actually experience risk.

As I said above, there was no discussion or even recognition of this point in the M&M papers or Wegman et al. (And, yes, I do recognize that centering on the calibration period has been denigrated by statisticians, but clearly using conventional centering has little effect on the final result).

As with NEMS, the methodologies, assumptions, conclusions, and opinions in this report are entirely the work of CDA statisticians and economists, and have not been endorsed by, and do not necessarily reflect the view of, the owners of the IHS Global Insight model.

The methodologies, assumptions, conclusions, and opinions in this Backgrounder are entirely the work of statisticians and economists in the Center for Data Analysis (CDA) at The Heritage Foundation, and have not been endorsed by, and do not necessarily reflect the views of, the developers of NEMS.

The methodologies, assumptions, conclusions, and opinions in this report are entirely the work of statisticians and economists at The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis and have not been endorsed by and do not necessarily reflect the views of the developers of NEMS.

Where statistics is involved (in much science it seems), the institution frequently audits, via independent analysis by house statisticians who do not know what the data represents.

What do you think of the way «climate scientists» have abandoned the r2 statistic used by all statisticians (because it did nt give the results they wanted), and invented their own «RE» statistic?

For me, as with countless other skeptics, my engagement in the climate discussion started with me reading a blog written by a Canadian statistician with the temerity to challenge the orthodoxy and state, «YOU»RE DOING IT WRONG!!!

I certainly don't think that, and in fact over the long term I suspect the people who will be most appalled by this mess are good statisticians.

Horatio: I thought it might, but I emphasize this because I think there is evidence (various places in SSWR) that the Wegman Report and later talks by Wegman and Said were doing what they could to foster a statisticians - vs - climate scientists fight.

However, he remembers being persuaded by the Oxford group (Frame, Allen, Stainforth, etc, I assume) and other statisticians that by doing this simple inversion F&G were inadvertently assuming a very skewed and unrealistic prior themselves.

In particular, climates scientists often get very «creative» with statistical methods, and often create results which don't stand up to review by qualified statisticians outside the field.

Perhaps involving a statistician would be helpful but then tens of thousands of papers have been published by scientists with functional application knowledge of stats that did not require such special assistance and yet involved much more thorny statistical challenges.

I see that one is by a statistician, so we do have statisticians working on the climate problems.