Sentences with phrase «done by the copyright»

Since licensing can only be done by the copyright holder, you generally need individual permission from each copyright holder to change the license of their code.

Not exact matches

How to Avoid a Social Media Lawsuit: Steps for Businesses to Take At the very least, make sure that your employee social media policy is outlined clearly, that the content your business is publishing is not copyrighted or trademarked, that you use full disclosure to abide by FTC guidelines and that you don't improperly share user data.

In a majority opinion written by Judge Christopher F. Droney, the appeals court said the Barry Diller - backed Internet company does not appear to violate copyright law because subscribers are assigned to their own tiny antennas at Aereo's Brooklyn data centre.

The federal appeals court in New York ruled that Aereo did not violate the copyrights of broadcasters with its service, but a similar service has been blocked by judges in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

It is hard to believe, for example, that Canada could not in the end find common ground with the US on some extension of patent protection for pharmaceuticals, since it was able to do so in the just - completed negotiations with the EU, or that an extension of the term of copyright protection from 50 to 70 years from the agreed baseline would have much if any real practical impact on Canada although it would be seen as a gain by the US given the heavy copyright portfolios of US entertainment companies, allowing them an additional period of time to exploit their copyrighted content.

By entering the Awards, you irrevocably and unconditionally consent to all acts being done that would otherwise infringe any of your moral rights (as defined in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)-RRB- in the Materials and any present and future rights of a similar nature conferred by statute anywhere in the world whether occurring before or after this consent is giveBy entering the Awards, you irrevocably and unconditionally consent to all acts being done that would otherwise infringe any of your moral rights (as defined in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)-RRB- in the Materials and any present and future rights of a similar nature conferred by statute anywhere in the world whether occurring before or after this consent is giveby statute anywhere in the world whether occurring before or after this consent is given.

Hunting people down for copyright violations is a waste of time that could be better spent supporting the work done by enthusiastic Catholics free of charge for the love of God.

Either way, the recipe originated here so it's every bit possible that a copy was made over there (either because Epicurious is running an excerpt from The Smitten Kitchen Cookbook, where this recipe also exists, as a promotional thing, or because one of their users submitted the recipe — which they would have done without my permission, which is a copyright infringement) but it doesn't change the fact that the recipe is copyrighted by Smitten Kitchen.

As reported by The Sun earlier this week, the Spanish defender was said to be at risk of facing an FA charge for posting the video, one that he doesn't own the copyright to.

In reality, probably the only thing James» team has a case over is the name (even then «The Shop» is already copyrighted by someone else) and the logo, which Bama does admittedly use a similar scissors symbol.

Permission granted for one product does not convey permission granted for another, even if the copyright of both is held by API, a specific API publication, issue of publication, or the same author.

End User acknowledges that he / she / it does not acquire any ownership rights by downloading copyrighted material.

But, if you're sharing the graphic quotes, please do not alter them, since some of the graphics are licensed for the use of our publisher Life Media by the photographer; that way, you're protecting the artist, us, and yourself from copyright infringement.

You warrant that you own the material you are submitting and that it does not infringe any copyrights owned by others.

Some smilies and avatars created and copyrighted by flowermama and children — do not use elsewhere.

Peter Mandelson is planning to introduce changes to the Digital Economy Bill now in Parliament to give the Secretary of State power to amend copyright law by statutory instrument, effectively allowing he and his successors to do anything, without parliamentary approval or debate, provided it is done in the name of protecting copyright.

In addition, by submitting any entry to the Contest, Participants hereby represent and warrant that the submitted work or information does not and shall not infringe on any copyright or other right of any third party, and Participant has the right to grant any and all rights and licenses granted to Sponsor herein, including but not limited to all necessary rights under copyright, free and clear of any claims or encumbrances.

7.1 The Publisher warrants to the Licensee that the Licensed Materials used as contemplated by this License do not infringe the copyright or any other proprietary or intellectual property rights of any natural or legal person.

If you wish to do any other acts restricted by the copyright you should apply in writing to the Director of Voices from Oxford at Balliol College, University of Oxford OX1 3BJ, England.

To do so, you must present, in writing, the following information in its entirety: - A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is being infringed; = The complaining party's address, telephone number and email address; = A statement that the complaining party has a good - faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent or the law» and — A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is being infringed; — Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed; — Identification of the material that is allegedly infringing; - The complaining party's address, telephone number and email address; — A statement that the complaining party has a good - faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent of the law; and — A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to at on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed, pursuant to the DMCA Act (17 U.S.C. 512 (c)(3).

In the event Partner modifies his websites or supplies content for the modification of his websites, Partner warrants that any content, images or material provided by Partner don't infringe any copyright and are not copied from any other website or publication.

The rights in material on this site are protected by international copyright, software and trademark laws and you agree to use this site in a way which does not infringe these rights.

Dating Guide for Smiths Clocks COPYRIGHT Barrie Smith 2005 Please do not steal any part of this publication and republish it on the Internet or in any Early Clocks, Lantern Clock dated 1692 by Richard Savage of Shrewsbury.

Konami, it seemed, tried to do the same to a highly critical YouTube clip by successfully issuing a copyright claim — a claim that YouTuber later overrode.

After Disney briefly attempted to copyright «Día de los Muertos» for «Coco» and was met with strong feelings including a petition signed by more than 21,000 about not doing that, Disney dropped that attempt and put a cultural consultant group for «Coco».

At that time, she wrote (via Hao Gamers), ``... why does a Japanese company, Koei have the copyright of this game when the game is obviously a derivation from the book Romance of the Three Kingdoms written by Chen Shou.

Let's all sit for a second and ponder all the ways we consume creative content now that did not even exist in 1995 OR 1998 and which are likely not explicitly covered by copyright law.

One way of doing this is by encouraging students to explore mashups, particularly by working with openly - licensed content — content that isn't copyrighted — as they do so.

If you feel that your material does not constitute infringement, you may provide us with a counternotification by written communication to our Designated Copyright Agent (as listed below) that sets forth all the necessary information required by the DMCA.

«They also don't like that the standards and assessments are copyrighted and can not be changed or modified by the states.»

Since the name Montessori is not protected by any copyright, Montessori in the name of a school does not necessarily mean that it adheres to the Montessori philosophy of education.

The Terms do not grant the User any right, title, interest, license (express or implied) to the App, any patent, trademark, service mark, copyright, trade secret or proprietary right associated with, on the part of Auto & General, the Service, or, previous applications or business methods of Auto & General (or its affiliates) required or provided in connection with the Service (whether owned or licensed by Auto & General or its affiliates or a third party); or arising from Auto & General or its affiliates» research and development activities.

You can do this by going to Dashboard / Book Info and scrolling down to the Copyright field.

(The Digital Economy Act 2010 passed by the previous government did include Section 43 which amends copyright for some public library lending.)

Are we violating copyright by doing so?

Despite my own disagreements with Cory Doctorow overt attacks on copyright, he gets it right in «Information Doesn't Want to be Free» by skewering all the intermediary chokeholds the Internet is creating for authors.

The old copyright law just protected physical books from unlawful print and distribution by people who did not have the right to do so.

This is on account of paper composing experts are educated on the best way to make interesting, custom papers, composed particularly as indicated by your details and rules, with the goal that you don't have to stress over copyright infringement.

Then in italics under that in 12 point put «Copyright 2010 by (Author name)» You can put your publisher name under that if you want, but do not say the copyright is by the pCopyright 2010 by (Author name)» You can put your publisher name under that if you want, but do not say the copyright is by the pcopyright is by the publisher.

By posting your work on Book Country, you're affirming that the work is in fact your own and doesn't infringe on another writer's copyright.

Copyright is automatically granted to your work once it's written - it's wise to show you're aware of copyright by including © Your Name (Year of Completion) at the beginning of your manuscript but otherwise you don't need to do Copyright is automatically granted to your work once it's written - it's wise to show you're aware of copyright by including © Your Name (Year of Completion) at the beginning of your manuscript but otherwise you don't need to do copyright by including © Your Name (Year of Completion) at the beginning of your manuscript but otherwise you don't need to do anything.

(If you do not understand what I mean by license your work, the you need to learn copyright.

By posting or uploading any Content on the Website: (i) you understand that if your Work is in aliterary categoryincluded on the Book Country Website, and complies with these General Terms of Use, your Work may be made accessible to users of the Website and members will be able to review, comment on it and rate it; (ii) you represent and warrant that (A) the Content does not contain any libelous matter or matter otherwise contrary to law or violate any rights of privacy or other personal or property right whatsoever and (B) you own or control all rights in your Content, that such Content is original and does not, and will not, infringe the copyright, trademark or any other right of any person or entity, and that any «moral rights» in the Content have been waived; and (iii) you grant to us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty - free, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable right and license (A) to display the Content on the Website, and (B) with respect to Content other than your Work, to use, display, reproduce, distribute, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, perform, make, sell and export such Content, in whole and in part, on the Website or in any formats and through any media, as we see fit, and you shall have no claims against Book Country for such use or non-use.

Since then, Amazon has been condemned by a number of people — authors and publishers alike — for not doing enough to protect the copyright of authors.

I didn't catch the title of that book, but it sounds like one of the above - mentioned, you know, free, out - of - copyright public domain books, many of which were, in fact, scanned by Google, which their — they have these huge processes underway now.

Work is done for a fee (either fixed or by the hour), and you retain full copyright, and publishing rights.

Also, what about self - published writers who don't go through the motions of actually «copyrighting» their work (since the work is still protected by the same copyright laws)?

Continue reading Alert: Copyright Infringement By the Internet Archive (and What You Can Do About It)

Virtually all books that are out of copyright are already available for free across the internet at various sites in most formats and you can use several apps to convert them into the Kindle ebook format.I can not support any attempt by Amazon to start charging for books that are already free.I do support the concept of a subscription based ebook service however and encourage all publishers to enter into such an agreement as quickly as possible before they become completely irrelevant.

That's what happened in the Dan Brown case: while he was certainly aware of the earlier book, and even used the authors» names to create a character name in The DaVinci Code, the courts found that Brown did not violate copyright because at best the books shared the same idea: Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene married and had a child, whose descendants are guarded by a secret cabal.