Sentences with phrase «done out of budget»

I'm not sure if this change was done out of budget reasons or not, but it really feels like a step back for the series.
I guess the closest I have come was when cottage came into style, it was already what I had been doing out of budget needs!

Not exact matches

Those looking for a deep dive into what Laszewski thinks will actually work can check out the complete post, but for non-wonks, his bottom line seems to be this: To fix health care we need to control costs overall, and to do that, the industry as a whole must be forced to stay within a set budget rather than gobbling up more and more of the nation's money.
Through the budget reconciliation process — which would avoid a drawn - out fight and filibuster by Democrats — Republicans can adjust only parts of the law that have to do with the federal government's finances.
If you don't have that kind of marketing budget, then you probably are going out of business tomorrow or you shouldn't be in business in the first place.
Double check your daily budget to be sure you don't unwittingly drain your bank account right out of the gate.
Underpinning Bravo's depiction of the power dynamics between a boss and her underlings (played out in the open floor plan of a cramped SoHo loft), are the very real problems of a working business: What to do if your client doesn't pay, how to deliver on a tight budget, and even what if your assistant ordered more printer paper than toilet paper.
So, carve out 10 percent of your budget and invest in experimentation, but don't expect immediate returns.
The budget proposal also included plans to eliminate duplicative energy programs and wasteful spending to help get «federal government out of the way and allow the private sector to do its job and flourish.»
I said yes out of enthusiasm and a desire to give you exactly what you wanted, but I should have checked with our resources / budget / bandwidth before saying it could be done.
Take into considering factors that might affect your sales numbers — such as the economy or the loss of a major customer — but don't worry too much because the basic tenet of budgeting is that the figures will never turn out to be exactly right.
If you still don't know, Sharknado is a low - budget movie produced by U.S. network SyFy about an out - of - control tornado that sucks up sharks from the ocean, then rains them down on Los Angeles.
We rage against out - of - control CEO pay, demand stricter corporate governance, and yet we love the dominant leader who cuts through the noise, gives us something we didn't know we wanted and creates the most valuable company in the world in an industry — consumer electronics and entertainment — that commands just two or three per cent of household budgets and GDP.
«We talk about budgets; we talk about planning your finances; but what a lot of people don't do is plan out the next 12 to 18 or 24 months of their careers,» StumbleUpon CEO Mark Bartels told Business Insider.
«Anybody should be doing annual budgets and going out a year or two to determine what the capital needs of the business are going to be,» he adds.
Food, Travel, and Hotel Budget Travel is an essential part of SoftNice's business because their clients are geographically spread out and much of the work the company does for them must be handled on site.
Fredrick Petrie, author of «The End of Work: Financial Planning for People With Better Things To Do,» recommends «taxing» yourself in order to get more money out of your wallet and into the bank — this way you'll make savings a priority from the get - go, rather than budgeting everything else first and then seeing what is left over for savings.
Earlier this year, one of our employees mentioned that while we give folks a lot of autonomy, we don't provide direct access to capital for cross-functional projects when we are figuring out budgets for the upcoming year.
Consider closing out accounts that you don't use, and prepare a standing budget so you don't run into any future issues with payments or accumulation of debt.
But if you have a little bit of budget lying around, are running a Wordpress website, and would rather just have the whole thing done for you, check out the Project Supremacy plugin.
thanks, and yes, a pittance of a pension and regular checkups keep us on budget and head off any problems — best decision i ever made (financial or otherwise) was serving our country doing search - and - rescue, oil and chemical spill remediation, etc. (you can guess the branch of service)-- along the way, frugal living, along with dollar - cost averaging, asset allocation, and diversification allowed us to retire early — Vanguard has been very good over the years, despite the Dot Bomb, 2002, and the recession (where we actually came out better with a modest but bargain retirement home purchase)... it's not easy building additional «legs» on a retirement platform, but now that we're here, cash, real estate, investments and insurance products, along with a small pension all help to avoid any real dependence on social security (we won't even need it at full retirement age)-- however, like nearly everybody, we're headed for Medicare in several years, albeit with a nice supplemental and pharmacy benefits — but our main concern is staying fit, active, and healthy!
The PC dynasty's final budget in March 2015 did propose a bad - medicine combination of modest budget cuts and assorted tax hikes — earnest efforts to bail Alberta out of chronic deficits, and exactly the sort of unpalatable budget a shrewd premier releases after an election, not before one.
Startups that run out of resources also usually do so because the founders don't want to give up a piece of the pie, the budgets were not planned properly, the burn rate was too high, or it just took longer to raise the first round than initially expected.
Spelling out the next steps on carbon pricing (p. 127): A good illustration of movement without dollars: while the budget doesn't allocate any funding for carbon pricing specifically, it does map out the way Ottawa plans to move ahead on its highest - profile climate commitment.
First budgets, after an election, often don't turn out well for Ministers of Finance.
While I'm not persuaded by the argument that Canada needs countercyclical Keynesian deficit spending (I think we're already out of recession), I do know what fiscal policy I would consider worse: arbitrarily cutting spending in a weak economy to balance the budget in light of a revenue shortfall stemming from lower than expected nominal GDP.
How do I allocate my budget and how I can earn a valuable return out of my investment?
This doesn't mean the Amendment will necessarily be left out of future budget discussions, but it does eliminate one pathway of extending these protections to the pot industry.
Them Dixiecrats did not die off, they just moved into the GOP and took it over using their «good - ole - boy» networks of «rebs» «klukkers» and other trash and financed it with all the special pork barrel money they've been quietly siphoning out of our budget for DECADES.
Someone took footage from a low budget movie called «Desert Warrior», did a fast overdub to add the offensive comments, and put it out on the net to obscure the fact that these people in the lands attacked by the US are actually angry over invasion, conquest, looting, drone strikes against civilians, torture, and being shot at by the United States on behalf of Israel.
In his recent budget speech, the Finance Minister pointed out that 40 per cent of our villages do not have proper roads, that 1.8 lakh villages do not have primary schools, that 4.5 lakh villages have drinking water and sanitation problems, that there is a shortage of 140 lakh rural dwellings.
Jesus did not come to earth to cut things out of a government's budget or even to be a political figure, he came here to redeem man from His sin.
We don't have a car, smart phones, an entertainment budget (including eating out), and are unable to get together enough money to own a home here (40 - 60 % down payment required, average cost of a 3 bedroom apartment - $ 1million).
It meant I could look up recipes and create my own version like I usually did with everything I cooked, rather than having to say a prayer to the gluten free gods that my baked good would work out, let alone trying to figure out the cost of all the GF flours on our then grad student budgets.
I'm trying to figure out how to budget for healthy foods, and I figure if I buy coconut oil, instead of butter for baking, then, this would go a long way towards that goal, and I think butter isn't as healthy in our world, since it is probably from cows that are fed anti-biotics, and milk that is pasteurized and homogenized, what do you think??
«Get a payment predictor of their dairy farm, do a budget, get some help and work out work how big the loss is going to be.»
It was created out of a desire to improve my weekly food budget and to experiment with additive - free, homemade non-dairy alternatives at home that don't use nuts like most recipes call for.
The A's don't exactly have that same kind of choice, but they do have to figure out if Reddick qualifies for that same sort of building - block status that Chavez did because he would probably take up a similar chunk of the budget.
Roy Hodgson doesn't have a kings ransom to play with and talk of a takeover is yet to be solidified with an actual buy out, so the Anfield boss still has to work within a very tight budget.
His track record speaks for itself and given his tactical astuteness, ability to work on a budget and get the best out of the players at his disposal, coupled with the most important ingredient of all which is a winning habit, it remains to be seen if Allegri does fancy his chances in England next year.
Is it more pertinent to look at overall salary numbers, or is it better to look at the spending teams do beyond out of pocket, beyond the salary budget?
lets all thank arsene for finally doing the right thing only time will tell but have we finally signed the DM we need STRONG MINDED NO HOLD BAR MIDFIELDER WE HAVE ALL CRAVED, but lets take it back we all know it will take 2 or 3 more like minded players to make us great again, he has tricked us all buy buying one superstar in the last 3 windows ALEXIS, OZIL and CHEC great players but can't do it all on their own, spending huge amount of money and saying we can buy the best players, on the surface this looks great we are buying top top players big prices but instead of spending his usual 50 mill on 2, 3, 4, 0r 5 players he has pulled the wool over are eyes with 1 superstar thinking the fans are that dumb enough to believe it, infact he has never spent his budget only balanced on sales too purchases, i love arsenal but this summer i hope for more he needs to do that consistently through out the team spend the same amount on the team stop balancing the american owners, grow a pair say yes we will buy a top defender and a world class striker, stan we love arsenal please be one of us do whats needed then you will fell proud as we are and we will adore you for it.
Hundreds of managers could have done better with the same players, and budget, so stop making Wenger out to be some kind of God, and go with the facts for once!
Your comments are very naive and idiotic.Even if he had a limited budget at that time it's not as if every player would cost him a fortune.Also it's not about the limited budget that makes him support his players to perform.It's his philiosophy.Even till this day he tends to support and persist with his players to bring out the best in them.If you think I don't know what am saying wait till they get fit.On Giroud if we are to be honest he should have been dropped long ago even in his second season.It was never rocket science to know that the guy ws not starter quality.Tell me which team would have persisted with Giroud as a starter more than Arsenal.He failed long ago and was really really benched like just last season.As for Szcz Wenger also did persist with him during the times he still wasn't performing.I hope people won't deny this.He persisted till he could take no more of it.That was the reason why he brought Ospina into the starting 11.
«That money is going to be coming from somewhere in the budget, and we have to be careful that it doesn't come out of the budgets that allow non-revenue producing sports to operate,» he says.
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
wenger has made the club profit this window i would have though as well all incomings have been covered out goings and other revenues coming in like c / l monies and squad releases wages being saved i bet we are in a + balance if we went through it properly we do nt know what the budget is so it could be worst there now way wenger has spend # 100 not even # 70 million transfers ospina = covered by the sales of miquel and monies made from cesc to chelsea so nothing really spend there debuchy = covered by the vela money chambers = covered by the vermalen sale # 11 million only goes up to # 16 if he does well in certain circumstances sanchez = covered by the c / l monies and no doubt what we are owed on previous player sales i.e cesc to barca and song monies still outstanding welbeck = covered by wages being freed up and the rest of outgoing transactions and previous player sales being owed so there we have most likely recoup most if not all of our transfer monies back and shafted and lied to puma and the emirates about spending there monies in sponsorship on tranfers and pocketing in» profit» aprox # 60 - 70 million of the transfer funds to boot wenger hang your head in shame
He could easily fetch a # 300,000 per week deal should he join United, City or one of these Chinese sides, and although we cant stretch our budget that far, we do need to push the boat out somewhat.
in the case of our club the powers that be sees us as a necessary evil... believe me if they could figure out a way to take our money without ever having to deal with us they would... instead they simply gauge our concerns then manufacture an aggressive PR campaign addressing said concerns so as to sell season tickets and the like... so whether it's about Sanchez staying, transfer budgets, lengthy player injuries, club expectations etc... this team has treated us like a petulant teenager that should be seen and not heard, which is a completely disrespectful way to treat incredibly loyal fans who pay some of the highest ticket prices in the world... this is why this team doesn't get the benefit of the doubt, this is why they don't get a pass when they screw up and this is why they don't deserve our respect when it comes time to show them the door... that time is NOW
For me Song is nor worth the money and I believe he chose to play for us to put himself in the window for others like Liverpool and Arsenal to see, He has not played with his heart since Xmas because he does not like the style BFS plays and he has no love for our club, I don't know if this player is any better but there are a lot of similar players out there, we have had one training with us and wants to sign and will cost us just his wages, many clubs will be releasing good midfielders this summer also and hopefully our new manager will recruit who he wants with the 2 Daves help and budget, BFS OUT STILL GIVING THE BOARD MY CONFIDEout there, we have had one training with us and wants to sign and will cost us just his wages, many clubs will be releasing good midfielders this summer also and hopefully our new manager will recruit who he wants with the 2 Daves help and budget, BFS OUT STILL GIVING THE BOARD MY CONFIDEOUT STILL GIVING THE BOARD MY CONFIDENCE
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z