Sentences with phrase «done outgassing»

The fumes from them are horrible, and I feel our older car seats are better, as hopefully they are done outgassing.
How on earth does this outgassing lead to a net increase in the atmosphere when the ice is still melting?

Not exact matches

When previous research showed how much carbon dioxide was outgassing from rivers, scientists knew it didn't add up.
Its oceans didn't develop for about a billion years, due to a thicker crust and lithosphere that delayed the start of volcanic outgassing.
«We've got a spacecraft on the way to Ceres, so we don't have to wait long before getting more context on this intriguing result, right from the source itself,» said Carol Raymond, the deputy principal investigator for Dawn at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. «Dawn will map the geology and chemistry of the surface in high resolution, revealing the processes that drive the outgassing activity.»
Barnhart said the changes from dry to wet periods might have had to do with periods of greenhouse - gas outgassing associated with volcanic eruptions, large impacts, or a change in the tilt of Mars» rotation, though all that remains to be studied further.
Permafrost outgassing is similarly a major issue — and what about all the studies on the Southern Ocean sink saturation — they don't matter either?
That would be wonderful if at least Atlantic TC reduce or do not increase with GW, since GW is and will be doing so much greater harm thru droughts, floods, disappearing glaciers, disease spread, ocean anoxia (with HS outgassing likely to follow), species loss, heat deaths,... am I leaving anything out?
The rate at which CO2 is taken up can of course vary, but I don't think any projections (at least until 2100) show net outgassing.
If you have this notion that ocean outgassing is the cause of the current CO2 increase, I recommend you do some simple calculations for yourself (see below).
Nothing to do with outgassing.
It affects their bottom line research as much as the outgassing does so it should be part of the reporting, graphs and all.
No, I don't know what those natural sources are, but I would place outgassing from the oceans high on the suspect list.
CO2 during the ice ages is a natural response of temperature (soda bottle outgassing), that fact doesn't predict anything if you artificially add extra CO2 into the atmosphere.
In broader terms, it doesn't matter to delineate the thermal activation of CO2 outgassing in the ocean and the analogous effects in the biota.
It DOES N'T take any net CO2 outgassing from the oceans in the case that the atmospheric CO2 growth is caused to a significant degree by warming climatic factors — there's MORE than enough human input to achieve the equilibrium between ocean and atmosphere.
The same process is still at work nowadays](discussion: p. 7) «Yes, the outgassing process is still operative today because the laws of physics did not suddenly decide to change.»
Yes, the outgassing process is still operative today because the laws of physics did not suddenly decide to change.
I did not realise that the planet Cantobtainia was completely sealed with a thick layer of cantobtainium (which prevents outgassing).
And if warming oceans are supposed to be nett outgassing carbon dioxide, how do they absorb more and become less alkaline?
I don't need to explain it for my Model to remain valid.The concept of ocean outgassing in response to more sunlight is a useful add on but not an integral component because I do not ascribe significant climate forcing to that CO2.
Girma, Yet you don't even realize that all you are doing is demonstrating Henry's Law regarding detecting outgassing sensitivity of CO2 to fluctuating sea - surface temperatures.
Nowhere in Hansen et al 2005 do they mention CO2 lagging temperature or ocean outgassing.
RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?
one could just as easily argue that it has a great deal to do with warmer temperatures and oceans outgassing.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z