We honestly believe in the principles and practices we're employing and the results are already going into the bottle and will only continue to improve as fine wine
does over the next few decades and beyond!
Not exact matches
The idea
did not take hold in Europe, but it made its way to the U.S.
over the
next few decades.
This is something which has been very well documented and mourned in a report from the National Academy of Sciences that was issued by a committee headed by Norman Augustine just a
few months ago and this report — which is called «he Gathering Storm» — lays out in some detail the concern that that [leaves us] with a long hole
over the
next couple of
decades, because of weaknesses in [the] way we fund basic physical sciences, the way we are training people to
do physical sciences, the way we treat science in elementary and high - school programs — all of those factors, the way we pay teachers, the way we use the patent system where we try to provide incentives in some of the physical sciences; we are losing our leadership gradually to other countries, especially in Europe and [of] particular concern in Asia, where the rise of science in, particularly China, to a certain extent India and other parts of Southeast Asia, are cause for long - term concern.
My father is somewhat of a climate «sceptic» and insists that the prediction of 0.3 C cooling is based only on solar irradiance and
does not take into account increased cloud cover caused by low sun activity (he beleives that we are going to be facing extreme global cooling
over the
next few decades).
On what non-anthropogenic basis
do the skeptics expect the earth to warm
over the
next few decades?
You seem to have gone to quite some length in creating an impressive straw man, which doesn't really need dealing with in detail, since I can simply jump to the end - point and agree that warming in excess of 0.325 C /
decade is indeed unlikely
over the
next few decades.
[Response: You're wrong, as JA points out, since much of the warming
over the
next few decades is contrained by commitment and current levels and doesn't much vary by scenario.
As yet, scientists don't know which process will dominate
over the
next few decades.
Should we choose to
do little to abate emissions
over the
next few decades, then the upper tails of our current emissions scenarios will become more likely, and that will cause the upper tails of the vulnerability distributions to become more likely.
I have predicted near record low Arctic Ice this year for a couple of reasons — but it
does seem likely to recover
over the
next few decades.
Global temperature not rising
over the
next few decades would
do it, barring supervolcanoes or anything with a dramatic cooling effect happening.
You say «Simply positing that they are «cyclical»
does not resolve whether or not they will continue to play a major role in our planet's climate
over the
next few decades».
Simply positing that they are «cyclical»
does not resolve whether or not they will continue to play a major role in our planet's climate
over the
next few decades, as the Chief, the Cap’n and other posters here have suggested could be the case.
In the first
few years the climate could cool as much as it
did during the Little Ice Age, with tenfold greater changes
over the
next decade or two.
That doesn't happen so much if people reduce fossil - fuel demand
over the
next few decades via efficiency and substitution of other energy sources, which doesn't happen overnight.
We don't immediately grasp the importance of limiting climate change to a couple of degrees
over the
next few decades.
«If electricity prices
do not rise
over the
next decade, only a
few plants will survive on the market without subsidies,» says an analysis by the Berlin - based consulting firm Energy Brainpool.»
Until you
do, I'm staying focused on the
next century or so, when my nephews and neices and their future children will be struggling with the consequences of global warming
over the
next few decades.
Now, with the caveat that Latif claims no «skill» in any forecast after 2015 — a caveat the media and deniers never print — as you can see, their model suggests we'll see pretty damn rapid warming in the coming
decade, just as the Hadley Center
did in a 2007 Science piece and just as the US Naval Research Lab and NASA recently predicted (see «Another major study predicts rapid warming
over next few years «'' nearly 0.3 °F by 2014 «-RRB-.
However, if you don't think the stock market will see modest appreciation
over the
next few decades, choose whole life insurance.