There is a difference between the «historical» Jesus, who quite frankly there is also zero evidence actually existed... no records, nothing, while there are records of other prominent people of that time period... you'd think if Jesus had really
done such miraculous things there'd be a record other than the bible somewhere, but there's not... and the mythological Jesus which was created using the possible historical Jesus as a template.
If I hadn't
done such miraculous signs among them that no one else could do, they would not be counted guilty.
Not exact matches
East Eastern Christians see a dichotomy of God and creation Eastern theologians are largely unaffected by modernism Eastern theologians
do not agonize over the existence of God Eastern theologians systematize the transcendent, the
miraculous, and the mystical into their theology, without a concept of «supernatural» Eastern theologians have coherent and helpful answers for most practical spiritual problems (
such as during bereavement) Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and bereavement counseling; thus they
do not outsource religious problems to secular experts.
But the fact that God makes possible
such self - transcendence by finite causes
does not mean that God's action thereby occupies a definite point in time or involves a predicamental
miraculous intervention in the world.
By that time various legends about Jesus were growing steadily,
such as that of the Virgin Birth, and the more
miraculous stories of what he
did during his earthly ministry.
In
such a (remarkable, but not -
miraculous) case, he could present himself with holes in his hands and feet and in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which
does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the dead.
We live in
such a fast paced world... Pregnancy is
such a
miraculous time and so many women these days don't take the time to connect with their bodies and babies.
Hollywood has been cranking them out for years, and while Ben Younger's «Bleed for This» doesn't
do much to stand out from the pack, the film is based on
such a great story — five - time boxing champion Vincent Pazienza's
miraculous return to the ring after a near - fatal car accident — that it's hard to believe it wasn't made sooner.