Sentences with phrase «done with the consent»

He made me do every imaginable thing sexually and I was compliant, knowing any time I said no, he would probably do it anyway and doing it with consent made it, somehow, not as bad.

This would either be done with consent from the other members, or at most be sent to the European Court of Justice (CVRIA).

Such a study could only be done with the consent of well - informed volunteers.

True, some older articles — especially those with enduring impact — have been made available on third party websites, though it is often unclear whether this is being done with the consent (or temporary forbearance) of the copyright holder, or simply being provided by enthusiasts who can not imagine that access to these works is still legally restricted.

In order for Mr. Al - Rawi to be convicted of the offence that's before the court, the Crown have to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Al - Rawi touched (the complainant), that it was in such a way it violated her sexual integrity and that it was not done with her consent.

«Under the FCRA, all checks including periodic checks must be done with consent unless there is a specific investigation for suspicion of misconduct or wrongdoing,» Rosen said.

This can only be done with your consent but it may increase your total household income.

(a) it is done with the consent in writing (authenticated as prescribed) of each person in whose favour the order referred to in subsection (1) was made; or

(a) it is done with the consent in writing (authenticated as prescribed) of each other party to the Part VII proceedings; or

Not exact matches

The most fundamental of those standards has to do with obtaining informed consent from research subjects.

But it's not at all clear that consumers understand exactly what kinds of information Facebook has about them, what can be done with it, or who would have consented to that data collection.

The lawsuit filing claims that they, and anyone else who joins the class action lawsuit, did not consent to Apple slowing down their phones and, therefore, Apple interfered with the possession of their iPhones.

The project is detailed in the contract as a seven step process — with Kogan's company, GSR, generating an initial seed sample (though it does not specify how large this is here) using «online panels»; analyzing this seed training data using its own «psychometric inventories» to try to determine personality categories; the next step is Kogan's personality quiz app being deployed on Facebook to gather the full dataset from respondents and also to scrape a subset of data from their Facebook friends (here it notes: «upon consent of the respondent, the GS Technology scrapes and retains the respondent's Facebook profile and a quantity of data on that respondent's Facebook friends»); step 4 involves the psychometric data from the seed sample, plus the Facebook profile data and friend data all being run through proprietary modeling algorithms — which the contract specifies are based on using Facebook likes to predict personality scores, with the stated aim of predicting the «psychological, dispositional and / or attitudinal facets of each Facebook record»; this then generates a series of scores per Facebook profile; step 6 is to match these psychometrically scored profiles with voter record data held by SCL — with the goal of matching (and thus scoring) at least 2M voter records for targeting voters across the 11 states; the final step is for matched records to be returned to SCL, which would then be in a position to craft messages to voters based on their modeled psychometric scores.

In the European Union another twist to this story is that Facebook's data transfers between WhatsApp and Facebook for ads / product purposes were quickly suspended — the CNIL confirms in its notice that Facebook told it the data of its 10M French users have never been processed for targeted advertising purposes — after local regulators intervened, and objected publicly that Facebook had not provided users with enough information about what it planned to do with their data, nor secured «valid consent» to share their information.

You will receive calls from LendVantage or its lending partners at the numbers you have provided using an autodialer system, and understand that your consent does not require you to proceed with any transactions.

You acknowledge, consent and agree that we may access, preserve, and disclose your registration and any other information you provide if required to do so by law or in a good faith belief that such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) comply with legal process; (b) enforce this Agreement; (c) respond to claims of a violation of the rights of third - parties; (d) respond to your requests for customer service; or (e) protect the rights, property, or personal safety of The Defense Alliance of Minnesota, The Defense Alliance of Minnesota Affiliates, its users and the public.

But unlike drake, Daniels says she consented to sex with Trump; they didn't use a condom, owing to her latex allergy.

Conversion of preferred stock occurs automatically and immediately upon the earlier to occur of the closing of a firm commitment underwritten public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement filed covering the offer and sale of common stock in which (i) the aggregate public offering price equals or exceeds $ 25 million, (ii) with respect to the Series F convertible preferred stock only, the public offer price per share of which is not less than one times the original issue price of the Series F convertible preferred stock, (iii) with respect to the Series E convertible preferred stock only, the public offer price per share of which is not less than one times the original issue price of the Series E convertible preferred stock and (iv) with respect to the Series D convertible preferred stock only, the initial public offering price per share of which is not less than two times the original price of preferred stock, or the date specified by holders of at least 60 % of the then outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, Series C convertible preferred stock, Series D convertible preferred stock, Series E convertible preferred stock, Series F convertible preferred stock and Series G convertible preferred stock, provided however, that in the event that the holders of at least 65 % of the then outstanding shares of holders Series G convertible preferred stock, at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series F convertible preferred stock or at least of 65 % of the then outstanding share of Series E convertible preferred stock do not consent or agree to the conversion, conversion shall not be effective to any shares of the relevant series of Series G convertible preferred stock, Series F convertible preferred stock or Series E convertible preferred stock for which the approval threshold was not achieved.

In order to do so, we may use certain personally identifying information, with your consent, to access your account for the purpose of troubleshooting, running tests, and / or otherwise providing support.

By submitting your contact information you are providing express written consent electronically via E-sign to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, and to share your information with up to 5 partners from our Approved Partner Network and for them to contact you (including through automated means; e.g. autodialing, text and pre-recorded messaging) via telephone, mobile device (including SMS and MMS) and / or email, even if your telephone number provided above is currently listed on any state, federal or corporate Do Not Call list and even if your phone company may charge you for the call.

What we have right now is Facebook with a CEO that's mind is in the right place, doing the best you can with 27,000 people but the consent decree does what it does.

He also told the paper that he had planned days earlier to reveal Trump's role in the payment — and did so with Trump's consent.

YOU: Gay & lesbianism — do Christians, fundamentalists in particular, ever ask themselves — why would God be concerned with what consenting adults do in their bedroom?

I would prefer that people leave it at this, «What two consenting adults do with one another that doesn't cause physical or financial harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»

Instead, it has Sex Week, an occasion to catechize tomorrow's leaders in the Gnostic dogma that our bodies — and the bodies of others universally available under the sole limitation of consent — are there for us to do with as we wish.

Gay & lesbianism — do Christians, fundamentalists in particular, ever ask themselves — why would God be concerned with what consenting adults do in their bedroom?

Clarifying his comments on the Jeremy Vine Show, Mr Fury said that he did not equate two consenting adults having sex with paedophiles.

As I posted previously on here, «What two consenting adults do with their lives, so long as it doesn't cause physical or financial harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.28 And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenant - breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful: 32 who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.

3 Months ago, a person was hired (secretly) without the consent or vote of the vestry (they were presented with a «FAit - acompli» at the end of the meeting), and is being paid to do one of the jobs that I have been doing very well for years.

d. To avoid a scene, I consented and she came with her 2 friends from the mega-church — both well to do.

There'd be wrinkles to iron out certainly, but I'm the kind of guy who doesn't think any act should be forbidden with the consent of all parties.

Without God, we are torn in two directions: universities praise diversity, but students still form cliques; politicians promise a bright future, but our news programmes are distressing; people are obsessed with scientific explanations of everything, and equally obsessed with the sentimental love expressed in pop songs; sexual abuse with a minor is the most shameful of all crimes, but everyone has a right to complete sexual liberation once they reach the age of consent; we relocate all over the world, preferring to live anywhere but home, yet we still agonise over our local sports club; we own many things, and still feel we don't have enough; we believe in discipline at school or at work, but we all have a right to «let ourselves go» at the weekend; we tolerate everything, except people that don't agree with us.

Do I really need to mention that a husband had sexual rights to his wives (with or without their consent, see Abraham and hagar).

What I must do, when I have taken part with all my energies in the consecration which causes its flames to leap forth, is to consent to the communion which will enable it to find in me the food it has come in the last resort to seek.

Consent does not matter to people with this mindset.

Whereas we would never give a rapist the option of living with his victim, God does indeed condone this outcome, and the victim's consent isn't even under consideration.

Conformity, falling in step with the crowd, consenting to less than the best because «everybody's doing it» — that is not new.

One final detail is the daintiness with which the Oscars dealt with the award for Animated Short Film won by Kobe Bryant, who had been accused of rape in 2004 and delivered a public apology that included the statement, «I now understand how she feels that she did not consent to this encounter.»

Our Churches, with common consent, do teach that the decree of the Council of Nicaea concerning the Unity of the Divine Essence and concerning the Three Persons, is true and to be believed without any doubting; that is to say, there is one Divine Essence which is called and which is God: eternal, without body, without parts, of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness, the Maker and Preserver of all things, visible and invisible; and yet there are three Persons, of the same essence and power, who also are coeternal, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

If you can use masturbation purely to bring physical release of tension with some sexual enjoyment thrown in, without that being addictive or fantasising about another person without their consent and without using pornography then personally I don't have a problem with it.

You said, «Normal to the APA is the same as bestiality if the animal and you do nt have a problem with it then its ok;» Animals can't give informed consent.

Elizabeth and Daniel have both consented to her arrangement with Joseph, but in so doing they have wronged Joseph's unsuspecting wife.

Simon I don't see anything wrong with two consenting people engaging in some fun with «no strings attached».

Men can be roughly divided into three classes: those who dislike duty and refuse to do it; those who dislike it and drag themselves to it with reluctant consent; those who do their duty and thoroughly enjoy it.

It breaks through human life, human time, and into human history, and in doing so, it possesses and releases its own power, with or without the consent of the human instrument through whom the Word is proclaimed.

It's a short walk from fantasizing about violence and rape to becoming someone who commits violence and rape — and even with consent, it is wrong to do so.

Then came the article in the Toronto Star this morning, detailing conversations with four separate women who allege that Ghomeshi did, in fact, abuse them without consent.

A question I want answered is why is the church obsessed with sexual activity between consenting adults but does not want to discuss sexual abuse?

What a huge leap to imagine that an ancient purity code in Leviticus 18 bears upon consenting gays and lesbians in the 21st century and has anything to do with ordination.