He gave each a will to decide what we are going to
do with this thing called life.
Not exact matches
A Times story in July was so laden
with quotes from disgruntled customers and staff that Price's worried friends
called to say he always has a place to stay if
things don't work out.
But when
things do come up (perhaps because a key client is
calling with a hairy monster of a problem), the manager is in the dark.
Assuming the letter you've received doesn't paint the whole picture for you,
calling this number will be well worth it as talking to a person not only helps you understand the nuances of the situation but there's comfort in knowing that a human being
with a name and a face at the IRS is there to help you figure
things out.
EASTWOOD: And so one
thing led to another so when I went off to Iceland to
do Flags of Our Fathers, I had
with me another script
called Letters from Iwo Jima.
«The
things you say on the
call and write in the filing have to match up, and I thought they just didn't,» he later said in an interview
with Reuters.
Once a month we have a conference
call with a key group of franchisees to discuss
things we're
doing right and areas that need improvement.
Just because a great many so -
called rules deserve a stake in the heart, doesn't mean you should take
things too far and start playing totally fast and loose
with language, however.
Advisers who work
with Brandes are equipped
with a so -
called «IDEAS» script,
with each letter identifying a different step in the process: Inquire about how the other person is
doing; Describe
things you hear; Empathize
with the client; Add your own point of view; Suggest a solution.
Resonance Founder and CEO Rachel Parker helps companies, associations, and other organizations understand why traditional advertising just isn't connecting
with today's customers... and how this new
thing called «content marketing» (which actually isn't so new) is
doing just that.
But when you get to
call them stocks and you get stock quotes daily on these pieces of paper that bounce around put people put numbers on it and volatility and all these other
things where really it's not that meaningful, you know from one sense if you're investing in businesses and you
did a lot of research and invested in eight different businesses
with the proceeds of your sale, people would think you're a pretty prudent guy.
Similar sentiments resonate across Facebook
with many
calling the act an inconsiderate and DB (acronym)
thing to
do.
That approach isn't surprising: As a trainee
with IDS Financial Services (a predecessor to Ameriprise) in 1987, Garrett so hated cold
calling that she got «sick to [her] stomach every Monday morning because [she] couldn't sell people
things they didn't need,» she told this reporter for a 2002 profile in Research magazine.
Pantera Capital's Charles Noyes
called it «opportunistic»
with a white paper that is «essentially a wishlist of
things they want to have, and how it will work assuming that their wishlist doesn't crash and burn.»
At a national sales meeting I
did on Smart
Calling prospecting for outside sales reps, Gary Farnam gave me a list of his takeaways from the session, along
with some of the
things he always
does on his
calls.
You speak of
things with certainty, even
calling a man a liar, a man you
do not know.
However, when leaders try to enlist me in their own vision, sometimes I agree because it fits in
with mine (and then look for ways to apply MY
calling and gifts to further the cause), other times I just
do my own
thing because I don't identify
with what they suggest.
I can understand a distrust
with organized religion and being an atheists, but are you not
doing the same
thing as Christians by saying what you think is real or
calling out those that you think are wrong.
I
call myself an atheit just to get even
with all the christians (in all their many varieties) for the times they told me I would go to H E double hockey sticks for not believing in their particular way of
doing» the jehovah
thing.
You
called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding
things that are helping to disprove
things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've
done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up
with something that no one has been able to give me a response
with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».
This has nothing to
do with Muslims... It is
called economy... in free market I can sell my goods to anybody I like to or not... If you think not selling goods to another nation is being insensitive than I have news for you... so
called EU christian countrys are guilty beyond your imagination for not selling certein
things to Muslim countries..
Well, the nice
thing is that I don't walk around thinking that I was born
with something
called «sin» (which is a concoction of religion) and spending my time trying to please an invisible friend.
But as long as I know how important maternal health is to Haiti's future, and as long as I know that women are being abused and raped, as long as I know that girls are being denied life itself through selective abortion, abandonment, and abuse, as long as brave little girls in Afghanistan are being attacked
with acid for the crime of going to school, and until being a Christian is synonymous
with doing something about these
things, you can also
call me a feminist.
Yet the so -
called Christians that Ryan associated himself
with for 19 years were really only concerned about people who viewed
things the way they
did... and had no love for him.
Thus it acknowledges
with the apophatic tradition that we really
do not know the inner being of divine reality; the hints and clues we have of the way
things are, whether we
call them religious experiences, revelation, or whatever, are too fragile, too little (and often too negative) for heavy metaphysical claims.
I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the
things the government now needed to
do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation
called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time
with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»
One
thing I tell my students
with some frequency is that you don't get to pick your
calling.
Our Churches,
with common consent,
do teach that the decree of the Council of Nicaea concerning the Unity of the Divine Essence and concerning the Three Persons, is true and to be believed without any doubting; that is to say, there is one Divine Essence which is
called and which is God: eternal, without body, without parts, of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness, the Maker and Preserver of all
things, visible and invisible; and yet there are three Persons, of the same essence and power, who also are coeternal, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
So if it turned out that a committee of zombies created the world, we can
call them God and realize it doesn't have a
thing in the world to
do with the God in the Bible.
With these pastors, priest, popes, and elders all lying to the people, misleading the flocks, as was prophesied they would in Ezekiel 20, Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23:1 - 5, we are all a lost generation of pestilence, greed, and poverty, and this is not old people, as taught to us in Isaiah 43:11,13 - 19; that this book gives us the past, present, and future of what is going on, then, and now, it's juxtapose, meaning one must «compare» what is going on today with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are doing the same thing now, calling it good, or right, prophesied in Malachi 3:13 -
With these pastors, priest, popes, and elders all lying to the people, misleading the flocks, as was prophesied they would in Ezekiel 20, Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23:1 - 5, we are all a lost generation of pestilence, greed, and poverty, and this is not old people, as taught to us in Isaiah 43:11,13 - 19; that this book gives us the past, present, and future of what is going on, then, and now, it's juxtapose, meaning one must «compare» what is going on today
with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are doing the same thing now, calling it good, or right, prophesied in Malachi 3:13 -
with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are
doing the same
thing now,
calling it good, or right, prophesied in Malachi 3:13 - 15.
This dilemma, it seems to me,
calls for reflection upon all those old fairy tales in which the bolder of three unrestricted wishes manages nevertheless to screw
things up: reading those stories as children,
with considerable incredulity, we thought that in the same situation we would surely
do better.
If a lion kills a zebra we don't
call it «murder,» and if a great white forcibly copulates
with a female, we don't
call it «rap.e» If everything is objective to people, moral code being up for grabs, it seems quite feasible to live in a world where these
things labeled as crimes are all just as ok as in the animal world!
That is somewhat promising — it hopefully means that 58 % don't really care — and rightfully so,
with that little
thing called separation of church and state.
Richard Dawkins directly
calls on atheists to
do such acts,
with the idea that it'll lead to more focus on
things that can actually be controlled by us, and resulting in a better life for everyone.
If he wanted to
call me an agnostic simply because I didn't believe the same
things he
did with the same certainty, let him.
In arguing
with atheists online - probably not the smartest
thing to
do, I'll admit it, BUT - I
do feel duty bound to fall on the sword
with someone like Richard Dawkins - on ocassion, because they rend such a huge YouTube'ism under their so
called scientific opinions.
Seems some big one's mind the joining of «Turkey» and that is why all this pressure applied to make Muslims life more difficult in Europe
with so many regulations... Some are taking into consideration the balance of powers and religions... Why can't Europe say no to America if
do not want the joining of «Turkey» to League... why buy time prolonging
with excuses and conditions while from inside they fight any
thing called Islamic from appearance to rituals...?!
That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of
things one is God
calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We
do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled
with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz
there's only one
thing you should
do with the time that you have, regardless if it's religious holiday, winter / spring break, or whatever you want to
call it.
@Aishah and Steve Martin, I have no problem
with others believing and
doing as they will, but at least
call things as they are.
American consti tution has nothing to
do with hinduism pagan ism of Mithra ism, savior ism
called Christianity, but every
thing with truth absolute, undivided God, claim by follower of hindu pagan trinity have no hand to be part of fundamentals of America.
The basic ontological problem is why there is anything at all and, since what
does exist is a plurality, how the
things that
do exist are unified into a world.88 Neville understands Whitehead's principle of «creativity» (together
with «one» and «many,» conjointly
called the «Category of the Ultimate» by Whitehead) to be an attempted answer to the ontological question.
They are attacking the grab bag of evils and absurdities associated
with that amorphous reality
called religion, which is an easy
thing to
do.
God didn't
call me to succeed in making sure everyone agrees
with my way of seeing
things but instead to be faithful to Jesus.
I've been spit on,
called names, threatened
with eternal burning, threatened
with your fists, and threatened that your god is going to
do terrible
things to me.
And if they drink any deadly
thing, it shall not hurt them; not that they were hereby warranted to drink poison, to show what power they had; but should they accidentally drink it, or rather should they be forced to it by their enemies in order to destroy them, they should find no hurt by it: and Papias F24 reports of Barsabas, surnamed Justus, who was put up
with Matthias for the apostleship, (Acts 1:23), that he drank a poisonous draught, and by the grace of the Lord, received no hurt: and the Jews themselves report F25, that «a son of R. Joshua ben Levi, swallowed something hurtful; and one came and whispered to him in the name of Jesus, the son of Pandira (so they
call our Lord), and he
did well.»
So, though I believe that the primary note in Jesus, understanding of the kingdom was the rule of God
with a moral and spiritual message of the judgment, yet the loving kindness of God and of God's
call to faithful obedience in all
things, I
do not believe that this prophetic note makes it necessary to reject wholly the apocalyptic.
There is only one
thing that will forever stand and that is Jesus Christ is real and you should read your Bible especially the book of John and Matthew chapter 25 everything in there is coming to pass and Jesus is getting ready to reveal himself to all the athesist buddhist etc the whole world.He is the King of King and lord of lords, if you think i'm crazy ask him to reveal himself to you if you are serious.Christianty is not a
thing it is again a personal relationship
with Christ thru his Holly Spirit that if you are 100 % ready to
call on and accept, its like your job you go to everyday you open the door and walk thru it, if you didn't you wouldn't know that it was there.
The pope also
called out Christians who try to earn their salvation through works and associating
with groups that don't actually
do the
things they say they are going to
do.
But as I said, to no surprise, this being gay is now a reality, from over many generations of wrong doings of sins, and should be expected, it's all good» along
with other pleasurable
things as greed, selfishness, etc. that we
do today, and
calling it good, but it is wrong as said, or prophesied it would be in Malachi 3 vs. 14,, 15.