Sentences with phrase «done without bias»

The value of trying to falsify predictions remains a valuable principle of scientific progress in my books — especially if can be done without bias and prejudice (quite a lot that we could discuss).

Not exact matches

What they can do, however, is analyze without the interference of human emotions or external biases.

All three bias in favor of their result, and without them you don't get their controversial result.

Staying curious is important, but doing so alone without conferring with others or accepting outside perspectives limits you to personal bias.

Although the bullish bias of the past two months has presented some great opportunities for momentum swing traders, no bull market moves straight up without eventually undergoing substantial corrections along the way (just as bear markets don't fall straight down for too long without large, counter-trend bounces).

I've already repeated a couple of times my own line of reasoning, you then decide to say I'm committing confirmation bias without (and here's the important part Ace) actually quoting or even showing me where I'm doing this, so yeah, I'm better than you (fact) and no pretty sure my method (the right method) is helping me just fine.

It does not stand up to scrutiny without such confirmation bias, and there is no evidence that you can produce to support your absurd beliefs.

Even if you don't agree with something it is good to understand it without bias.

If any christians had a decent argument, they'd focus on it, instead of on the imagined «hate» and «spite» they seem to see in everyone who doesn't agree with them — but not in god, who demonstrates it in every book of his «word» if you but only read without the bias of indoctrination / brainwashing.

James, if you had the courage to look at the evidence without bias, you'd not be making the claims you do and suggesting that the bias problem is with others.

Now will he try to get the church into the 21st century, and help prevent the spread of disease, open schools without the religious bias, and go completely transparent as to the criminal activity the RCC has been doing for many, many decades?

Do yourself a favor, clear your mind and try to interpret an authentic translation of the Quran without being biased.

Perhaps you should compliment him on all he gives to those in need without bias as to orientation or beliefs (sorry the American Atheists have not expressed a belief so he does not support them)

You can't read a politically biased blog and form your opinions without actually checking sources and doing a little homework.

Maybe the likes of Manuwa, someone who doesn't have great wrestling and he could smother him without getting knocked out but I think the 205» ers who he can't hold down likely KO him — but my opinion is biased I'm not a fan at all so my view is that I wouldn't be upset if I didn't see him fight anymore — regardless, don't want to see any fighter take permanent damage

About the match yesterday, he might be rusty I really du n no But without being bias, Wilshere should not start ahead of Drinkwater (based on current form) or Henderson (who is a more able and strong footballer) Something like: Drinkwater - Alli Henderson - Alli Drinkwater - Wilshere Would be good England IF they play 4 -2-3-1... But if you consider this season, I think the best is Drinkwater - Alli..

The better articles on here are without bias, which is sometimes hard to do of course.

Do you think our referees perfect and function without weakness or bias?

But it's really a process that, as a core foundation, is based on providing evidence - based information, clinical judgment and expertise without a bias, and clear outlines of risks and benefits and alternatives, including doing nothing in any given situation.

Does Birth beyond bias promote birth without medication or support women who choose interventions and pain medication?

Many fathers» rights proponents argue that the legal system is biased against fathers when it comes to family decisions, leaving many dads who desire to share parenting responsibility without the chance to do so.

If you can't give a neutral description without inserting your own biases, please don't answer at all.

At a time when only four in ten Americans trust mass media, and only one in four believe the media even attempts to report without bias, Trump's ability to send the media into overdrive fact - checking, debunking, and calling him out likely sends the same signal to voters that his provocation of the GOP establishment did: he is someone who will drive those who have betrayed their trust up the wall.

«It also made me wonder if there's a female bias present in terms of, «I struggled through grad school without taking leave; I think others should do so as well.»»

So I did a survey of 140 movies that depict scientists, just picked them out of databases without any bias, and I judged whether they were depicting scientists, portraying scientists as heroes or villains and the ratio was six to one, heroes over villains and even the villains were not really villainous, they were not evil.

-- How an ancient food staple became toxic junk food, and what we can do about it (without going gluten - free) http://grainstorm.com/pages/rant (< - commercial site, so biased somewhat probably) • Against the grain on Norman Borlaug http://theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/sep/15/norman-borlaug-legacy

A-line skirt (if you're heavy on the torso, choose skirts with zips on the side to steer the eye away from the torso), torso skirts (or peplum), godet, circle or flare skirts (skims over hips and a wide, full hem), pencil (without waistband, hit below the knee - length and worn with high heels), and bias skirt (always inspect your rearview and make sure you don't have a very flat look from behind).

I think it is good to do Radiometric dating without being religious biased.

Some viewers might grade it poorly like they did with 12 years a slave, Glory, or Selma for i.e., but if you are without racial bias, then sit back and enjoy.

it did nt help having sites like Bloody disgusting putting out biased reviews without disclosing their relationship to the movie either.

One point is that when the survey is paid for by a partisan organization promoting a particular point of view, no matter how reputable the vendor that actually does the work, it still presents the appearance of partisan bias, and that's not without reason.

This praise did not come with any measure of bias, as Chin was the same judge who rejected the 2011 settlement terms between Google and a number of publishers, stating that the settlement would be «rewarding [Google] for engaging in wholesale copying of copyrighted works without permission, while releasing claims well beyond those presented in the case.»

If the author wants to denigrate writers who accept the support of their loving spouses and S.O.s, he could at least have the courage and intellectual honesty to do so without gender bias.

While I have potential Beta Readers among friends, family, and my Writer's Group (and anyone here willing to take up the cause), where do I find a complete strangers to read without personal bias?

It seems equally arguable that there is a bias towards presenting something close to the worst posssible case, and then using this to argue that «something must be done» without attempting to account for how unlikely this worst case is.

According to McIntyre these Bristlecone proxies produce an enormous hockeystick bias but somehow this bias just doesn't show up between reconstructions with and without the Bristlecone proxies using the 1450 proxy network.

Dan is heavily at odds with quite a few members of the group that you (vaguely) describe as the «calamitous climate change culture,» yet not only do you place him into that group (without specifying how or why), you even go so far as to, with complete certainly, explain a causal mechanism behind a putative bias in his work on the basis of his strong identification with that group.

As an example of an objective engineer's presentation of global warming data, and a typical engineer's reaction to it without panic or fear mongering, I recommend Burt Rutan's global temperature presentation, what we should be doing now in the face of this evidence, and critique of biased data presenters at: http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/EngrCritique.AGW-Science.v4.pdf

It's incidentally a similar error to the one you made, confirmation bias, he saw a graph that favored his point of view and used it in his presentation, without doing due diligence and checking it (or acknowledging the source apparently).

Do you really think that it is likely that you are without the reasoning biases that incline you to filter data and evidence so as to confirm your preconceptions?

Since judging the status of entire scientific theory is probably one of the most difficult things that a scientist can do without having a very broad and deep knowledge of the field, I am skeptical that you are capable of making such a judgement... and that your judgement is really uncolored by your libertarian biases.

Without omnipotent knowledge, one must assume that the bias could be on either side, or indeed both, and you haven't done that.

It's quite hilarious to see Pielke Sr complain about «professional discourtesy», when Anthony Watts has had plenty of chances to do the analysis himself, but instead decided to claim a warm bias without doing the number crunching.

Repeatedly he claimed that the poor siting resulted in a warm bias, without ever doing the analysis.

That said, my theory is certainly not proven either (though it does fit all the facts)- and if we do experience (or can forcast convincingly) global warming that is annoying to humans we should look at CO2 reduction or insolation reduction (there are many methods available, all need to be explored without bias).

Even for trees that have a signal that is causally linked to temperature, simply having a positive (even a large positive) correlation does not mean that the low frequency component of that signal is represented without bias or non-stationary in sensitivity.

Back in the day when science was not questioned because sciences asked questions instead of as the case for AGW where science just supplies answeres without even a question being asked, data physical measurement, and strict adherence to the scientific method were what drove science and there was no political or ideological influences biasing whart was done.

In Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada, [2003] 2 SCR 259 Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, speaking for a unanimous court, stated at para. 57: «Simply put, public confidence in our legal system is rooted in the fundamental belief that those who adjudicate in law must always do so without bias or prejudice and must be perceived to do so.»

The fact that the chair of the discipline panel in 2010 also participated in the most recent discipline decision did not create an issue of bias, where the 2010 decision was based on an agreed statement of facts, without anyone calling any evidence.

And, because they're cold, emotionless computers, they do things with soulless efficiency and without bias, right?