Several cities and counties in California have filed lawsuits against Exxon and other oil companies, alleging they conspired to cast
doubt on climate change science and delay restrictions on greenhouse gases.
Not exact matches
Those differences can be caused by people intent
on misleading the public, like the organized campaigns to create
doubt about the
science pointing to human - caused
climate change, she said.
Naomi Oreskes is a
science historian, professor at the University of California, San Diego, and co-author (with Erik Conway) of «Merchants of
Doubt,» a book that examined how a handful of scientists obscure the facts
on a range of issues, including tobacco use and
climate change.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — President - elect Donald Trump's choice to lead the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency expressed
doubt about the
science behind global
climate change during a contentious Senate confirmation hearing
on Wednesday, but added he would be obliged for now to uphold the EPA's finding carbon dioxide poses a public danger.
Doubting or rejecting the
science on climate change no longer makes someone a «skeptic» or «denier» in the views of a leading news organization.
(Reuters)- The U.S. electric industry knew as far back as 1968 that burning fossil fuels might cause global warming, but cast
doubt on the
science of
climate change and ramped up coal use for decades afterward, an environmental watchdog group said
on Tuesday.
The full quote:» Three investigations of the alleged scientific misconduct of the
Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — one by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, a second by the Scientific Assessment Panel of the Royal Society, chaired by Lord Oxburgh, and the latest by the Independent Climate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their coll
Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — one by the UK House of Commons
Science and Technology Committee, a second by the Scientific Assessment Panel of the Royal Society, chaired by Lord Oxburgh, and the latest by the Independent
Climate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their coll
Climate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what
climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their coll
climate scientists have never seriously
doubted: established scientists depend
on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their colleagues.
While Heartland continues politicizing
science, demonizing credible scientists and using tobacco industry tactics to forge
doubt over global warming, Americans are feeling the real toll
climate change is already taking
on society, by increasing the severity of storms like hurricane Sandy or pushing droughts, wildfires and heatwaves to new extremes.
Heading into the 2015 True / False Film Festival in Columbia, Missouri, the last two documentaries I reviewed were Kirby Dick's The Hunting Ground, about rape
on college campuses, and Robert Kenner's Merchants Of
Doubt, about the industry - financed «experts» who deliberately muddy the debate over the settled
science of
climate change and cigarette - smoking.
Smalley's views are utterly at odds with
Climate Depot's robotic propagation of any content — valid or not — as long as it casts doubt on science pointing to risks from human - driven climate
Climate Depot's robotic propagation of any content — valid or not — as long as it casts
doubt on science pointing to risks from human - driven
climate climate change.
As has been hinted at here there is resistance to factual debate
on climate change that amounts to intrigue — as Sir David King said, he was «being followed around the world by people in the pay of vested - interest groups that want to cast
doubt on the
science of
climate change».
Doubt should not stop us from taking reponsible action on climate change, and doubt should not stop us from calling for changes in how climate science is
Doubt should not stop us from taking reponsible action
on climate change, and
doubt should not stop us from calling for changes in how climate science is
doubt should not stop us from calling for
changes in how
climate science is done.
Despite virtual unanimity among scientists that
climate change is real, and that it is caused by human activities, people who cast
doubt on climate science continue to dominate the debate.
They can pay off academicians to write articles and make speeches to cast
doubt on legitimate
climate -
change science.
In addition to raising
doubts about
climate science and about the need to slow
climate change by reducing emissions, the company site omits any discussion of the costly consequences of
climate change, choosing instead to focus exclusively
on high - end estimates of the costs of reducing emissions.
Here's a story we all now know well: A small number of groups backed by the fossil fuel industry have for decades shed
doubt on the
science of
climate change, even as the actual scientific community consensus
on the issue — that greenhouse gas pollution posed a significant threat to our
climate — remained strong and continued to grow stronger.
Hassol and Somerville said one obstacle to their work
on communicating the
science of
climate change is an active disinformation campaign — comparable to one run in the past by tobacco companies — that seeks to sow
doubts about scientific findings.
The International Conference
on Climate Change is a yearly gathering of climate change deniers and disinformers — mostly hardcore libertarians — who attempt to spread doubts about climate s
Climate Change is a yearly gathering of climate change deniers and disinformers — mostly hardcore libertarians — who attempt to spread doubts about climate sc
Change is a yearly gathering of
climate change deniers and disinformers — mostly hardcore libertarians — who attempt to spread doubts about climate s
climate change deniers and disinformers — mostly hardcore libertarians — who attempt to spread doubts about climate sc
change deniers and disinformers — mostly hardcore libertarians — who attempt to spread
doubts about
climate s
climate science.
Despite early knowledge about
climate change, electric utilities have continued to invest heavily in fossil fuel power generation over the past half a century, and since 1988 some have engaged in ongoing efforts to sow
doubt about
climate science and block legal limits
on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants.
Cherry - picking the statements of one or two particular scientists, or attempting to cast
doubt on a few of their e-mails does not and can not undermine the accumulated data and wisdom of
Climate Change science.
ICN's eight - month investigation assembled details of Exxon's early understanding of the emerging
science of
climate change, casting a new light
on the company's subsequent campaign to postpone aggressive
climate policies by sowing public
doubt about the
science.
Starting in the early 1990s, three large American industry groups set to work
on strategies to cast
doubt on the
science of
climate change.
For me, being engineering trained in chemistry and physics and quantitative methods and with 40 years working
on the
science of
Climate Change (both cooling and warming), including nearly 30 as a Board Member of the NOAA Program in
Climate Change and 14 with IPCC leadership roles, I seriously
doubt there is enough CO2 or any other trace gas to really matter significantly.
While Heartland continues politicizing
science, demonizing credible scientists and using tobacco industry tactics to forge
doubt over global warming, Americans are feeling the real toll
climate change is already taking
on society, by increasing the severity of storms like hurricane Sandy or pushing droughts, wildfires and heatwaves to new extremes.
There is an interesting book called Merchants of
Doubt (by Oreskes and Conway) that talks not about the
science behind
climate change but about how some scientists
on corporate payrolls went about creating an attitude of denial about
climate change and varying other topics.
The reason half of Americans
doubt the
science on climate change isn't because they are stupid or misled by the fossil fuels lobby, but because the global warming issue has now become as much as part of America's culture wars as abortion or creationism.
The consequences of such
doubts are important: elimination of the
science is settled arguments; less money and talk
on drastic
climate change mitigation measures; more focus
on alleviation of Third World poverty.
In stark contrast to the often repeated assertion that the
science of
climate change is «settled,» significant new peer - reviewed research has cast even more
doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human - caused global warming.
Stop booking «merchants of
doubt» and all those who deny and distort the established
science on climate change — including Marc Morano (Climate Depot), William O'Keefe (George C. Marshall Institute), Tim Phillips (Americans for Prosperity), Fred Singer (The Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Inst
science on climate change — including Marc Morano (Climate Depot), William O'Keefe (George C. Marshall Institute), Tim Phillips (Americans for Prosperity), Fred Singer (The Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Inst
climate change — including Marc Morano (
Climate Depot), William O'Keefe (George C. Marshall Institute), Tim Phillips (Americans for Prosperity), Fred Singer (The Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Inst
Climate Depot), William O'Keefe (George C. Marshall Institute), Tim Phillips (Americans for Prosperity), Fred Singer (The
Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Inst
Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Institute).
The data correction makes no perceptible impact
on measured increase in global warming and do nothing to cast
doubt on the
science of
climate change.
He has a very expensive stake in making sure public opinion
on the
science of
climate change is split by
doubt.
While the United States continues the ridiculous debate
on the
science of
climate change (see «Climategate» scandal, which is a result of hacked e-mails from a British research institute, but seems to be getting most play in the United States; but see also this excellent response by the U.S. scientific community organized by a colleague), little such
doubt lingers in China, a country governed by technocrats with degrees in engineering and
science.
E-mails leaked last November cast
doubt on the integrity of a few of the 4000 scientists who produce consensus reports for the U.N. body
on climate change science (Science, 4 December 2009, p.
science (
Science, 4 December 2009, p.
Science, 4 December 2009, p. 1329).
I can only assume that YOU are paid by the fossil fuel industry to cast
doubt on the
science of
climate change.
A study of coverage of the recent United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) report finds that many mainstream media outlets amplified the marginal viewpoints of those who doubt the role of human activity in warming the planet, even though the report itself reflects that the climate science community is more certain than ever that humans are the major driver of climate
Climate Change (IPCC) report finds that many mainstream media outlets amplified the marginal viewpoints of those who doubt the role of human activity in warming the planet, even though the report itself reflects that the climate science community is more certain than ever that humans are the major driver of climate c
Change (IPCC) report finds that many mainstream media outlets amplified the marginal viewpoints of those who
doubt the role of human activity in warming the planet, even though the report itself reflects that the
climate science community is more certain than ever that humans are the major driver of climate
climate science community is more certain than ever that humans are the major driver of
climate climate changechange.
Senator James Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma, the most outspoken
climate change skeptic in Congress, was scheduled to be the kickoff speaker at the nation's most prominent gathering of those who
doubt or deny the
science of global warming, which began
on Thursday morning in Washington.
Inglis's reflection
on the GOP's tendency to reject the findings of
climate scientists isn't just about the party's image, it's also indicative a trend that's likely to find its way into the highest levels of legislative leadership, as the top chairman picks for House committees
on Energy and Commerce, as well as
Science, all have expressed
doubts about the validity of
climate change.