Sentences with phrase «down public provision»

Not exact matches

Regulated public utilities will not qualify for the immediate depreciation provision, which is optional, and developers can opt out of the 100 % depreciation bonus and write down their assets more slowly, which NRF notes can be important in partnership flip transactions.

Last week, the Governor and legislative leaders reached an agreement on multiple bills that include new programs and insurance reforms to improve treatment options for individuals suffering from heroin and opioid addiction; measures to strengthen penalties and put in place additional tools for law enforcement to crack down on the distribution of illegal drugs; provisions to ensure the proper and safe use of naloxone, an overdose antidote; and support for enhanced public awareness campaigns to prevent drug abuse.

The next year, in Arizona Free Enterprise PAC v. Bennett (2011) the Court further restricted state authority to regulate campaign finance to achieve greater equality, striking down provisions of Arizona's public financing system that gave extra government money to candidates who faced high - spending opponents or high levels of independent expenditures.

Arizona's special education voucher law was struck down by the state courts after a challenge from the teachers union and civil liberties groups, which claimed that the law violated a state constitutional provision barring any public funds from flowing to religious institutions.

Now charters can expand with money meant for public schools and they even voted down a provision requiring transparency from charter operators.

The Florida public - school establishment is suing to repeal the Sunshine State's 13 - year - old school - choice tax credit and its new education savings accounts under the state's Blaine Amendment and its «uniformity clause,» which mandates that «Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality system of free public schools...» The Florida Supreme Court previously struck down the state's voucher program under this provision in Bush v. Holmes (2006), on the grounds that the vouchers «divert [ed] public dollars» from «the sole means set out in the Constitution for the state to provide for the education of Florida's children.»

The case at stake thus also deserves a simple solution: according to Article 8 (3) of Regulation (EC) 1370/2007, «public service contracts in existence on 3 December 2009 [could] continue until they expire [d]», subject to the maximum periods laid down by that provision and subject to the requirement that those contracts had been «awarded in accordance with Community and national law».

As far as the Charter is concerned, the Judge held that the establishment of a fee linked to the provision of a public service, the cost of which can reach up to 10,500 euro, constituted an obstacle to the right of effective judicial protection, as it is laid down in Article 47 of the Charter.

In a 5 - 4 decision, the Court struck down an Arizona public financing statute featuring a matching funds provision similar to those in North Carolina and Wisconsin, although the Arizona statute applied to executive and legislative elections only.

In the first case, Mounted Police Association of Ontario v. Canada, a 6 - 1 majority struck down provisions that excluded RCMP officers from the Public Service Labour Relations Act, which in effect imposed a management - controlled labour - relations regime on RCMP officers.