WASHINGTON — Today, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and 30 organizations listed below released the following statement regarding
draft accountability regulations for the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) issued by the Department of Education in May: «The regulations the Department proposed in May are a good first step towards ensuring that all... Read More
The latest skirmish was last week's House education committee hearing where Chair John Kline (R - MN) sharply critiqued the Department of Education's (ED's)
draft accountability regulations for proposing requirements he deemed best left to states.
Not exact matches
• Decide what they want to do with Obama's
draft regulations on testing,
accountability, and finances;
The federal ESSA
regulations give the state Board of Education the authority to
draft and approve a school
accountability plan based on test scores and other factors that is approved only by the federal Department of Education.
North Carolina is developing a new school performance
accountability plan to line up with the
regulations created under the ESSA law, and DPI plans to submit its
draft to the federal Department of Education in September for approval.
Education Week continued highlighting «key groups that have weighed in on the
draft ESSA
regulations covering
accountability.»
On May 31, 2016, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) released its first round of
draft regulations regarding implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) through a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on
accountability, state plans and data deporting.
Subsequently, on July 11, 2016, ED released
draft regulations for state assessments under Title I, including Title I, part A (statewide assessments) and Title I, part B (Innovative Assessment and
Accountability Demonstration Authority) of ESSA.
(Calif.) Bowing to pressure from legislative leaders and advocates for low - income students, the Brown administration has promulgated
draft regulations imposing far more
accountability requirements over billions in new school funding than originally proposed.