My methodology went like this: I searched the Baseball - Reference database for players
drafted at each position.
They may need to double up in
the draft at that position.
With Cliff Avril likely leaving, they could select a defensive end, but there is simply too much depth in
the draft at that position to take a DE here.
On Wednesday morning, BetOnline posted odds for the first player
drafted at every position.
Not exact matches
Also There really isn't much
at the MLB
position who are better than Kuechly if any and you can't just
draft another guy like him.
EDGE is an expensive
position to fill so it'll be interesting to see how the Bears handle it but I'd be really surprised if
at least one EDGE rusher isn't
drafted and
at least one starting caliber EDGE rusher isn't secured in free agency.
To not
draft a guy because we had another guy bust
at the same
position with similar mesurables... I guess we can never
draft another corner or safety in the 1st because I do nt see anyone being more athletic than Claiborne or Byron Jones....
With Peterson turning 30 years old this offseason and the upcoming NFL
Draft loaded with top - tier talent
at the running back
position, perhaps his time in Minnesota is nearing its end.
Also, I struggle with this line of thinking because outside of PF, we could realistically
draft at any other
position as we are still a shitty roster.
Giving up high round
draft picks to get a QB
at the detriment to other
positions would be just as big of a risk if not a much longer term risk.
The Vikings could consider
drafting DeAndre Hopkins here to get another wide receiver, but it's tough to justify
drafting two wide receivers in the first round, especially one that is this deep
at the receiver
position.
I'd be willing to take Fultz
at that price, but betting on each team's
draft position is a fool's errand.
This runs in direct contrast with the odds
at Sportsbook.com where they have set the over / under for Oladipo's
draft position at 3.
Any
draft picks that are spent on «luxury players» when we have significant holes
at other
positions on the roster, are wasted
draft picks in my opinion.
There were defensive options available here
at No. 28, but the Steelers have never
drafted by
position or need, but based on the best player available.
The next year, also in the 5th round, they added Richard Sherman, a WR - turned - corner from Stanford who stewed during the
draft as other players
at his
position were
drafted ahead of him (he turned out fine).
Best player available sounds great and all, until you have a massive hole
at a
position going into the
draft and you fear that
position group will be picked over by the next time you're on the clock.
Ooh, one injury is separating us from Schaub
at the most important
position, so let's trade up and
draft Mayfield.
If you wait until the
draft unfolds and can pencil in a starter
at an impact
position for a team weak
at that
position then you can choose a likely stat heavy player.
We should begin banishing the thought of only
drafting for immediate starters and being okay with highly
drafted backups if
at positions with higher learning curves
At this point the Niners may be best
positioned to trade out of 9 before the
draft, possibly to a team that wants to move up, but needs a higher pick as the move back slot for the trade partner.
You let it play out, you take a developmental tackle late and you make it a high priority in next year's
draft which has better talent
at the top
at LT.. But that's my
position bias talking.
We have seen as the concept of need is also very volatile in the NFL: one or two injuries
at a
position and a solid group is now shallow; you
draft to become a contender the sooner, not to field the best team you can for the following season, and if a youngster becomes a top player
at a
position where you are stacked, you can later trade your veterans, or just have expensive contracts off the book...
He did 25 reps on the bench, which is good enough for me, but certainly not an eye - popping number when you compare it to top performers on bench
at his
position in this
draft or in previous
drafts.
For all of the chatter All - America Marcus Smart generated last April, when he decided to return to school instead of entering the NBA
draft, his coach, Travis Ford, has been more impressed by Smart's decision making
at the point guard
position.
But we could be in a good
position to benefit, especially if they fear New England possibly
drafting QB
at the bottom of the first.
The logic is that it's a
position of value, a
position of need, and this is the best chance you're going to have
at getting one without overspending in FA or packaging up multiple
draft picks to move up.
Maybe I'm wrong but sure looks to me o line is the weakest
position in this
draft, it's deep
at rb de cb imo....
At this point, I don't view what this organization has put together through the
draft and with youngsters as being able to fill the holes on the roster needed to get this team into a
position to be a Cup contender.
As SB Nation NFL
Draft editor Dan Kadar points out, the Colts selected TE Dallas Clark last time they were
at No. 24 so there could be some good luck with this
positioning.
I don't see the value in
drafting a player
at 7 who would mostly play a
position that's not as important as, say, a DE or CB.
The offensive line still has a big question mark
at LG but I think that will be addressed in the
Draft (I would like to see a first round pick
at the
position if the quality is there).
Looking
at the entire
draft class, including every
position group, ~ 60 % didn't get timed in a 3 - cone drill, but here are some of the results from guys that did run one.
But, there were so many other better players (
at different
positions) available when St. Brown was
drafted that I rate it as a well below average pick.
As an additional filter, consider that Dallas likes to
draft the best player
at his
position.
They'll never be in a better
position to land the most difficult to
draft position on a pro team and
at a
position of need than this year.
I want the 49ers to
draft a guy
at Edge that I believe has the best chance to be a well above - average producer
at his
position for the longest time in the 49ers system.
If you look
at Dorsey's history in the
draft, his first - round picks are all
at the top four
positions on a NFL team — left tackle, cornerback, defensive end, and quarterback.
I am stating that 15 possible candidates and 5
position groups is about as telling as throwing darts
at a list of
draft prospects.
Dallas has a tendency to «visit» with players with similar
draft projections when they are intending on striking
at a
position at a particular place (as a value), but this looks like Dallas is planning on waiting until the WR value is «right».
When I wrote this piece, it was clear to me that recent
draft history indicates it is folly to write off players being available later than expected, especially
at the less valuable
positions.
The rest like I said I do nt watch college football so I was looking more
at position and going by the quick writeup and did nt see anything Id hate, its not like
drafting a punter or spending a top 15 pick on a HB or anything.
The
position requires a longer apprenticeship than forward — «You have to have seen a situation and been burned before you can master it,» Islanders coach and general manager Mike Milbury says — but with defensemen
at the top of recent
drafts,
at least a few seem destined to break through.
When you have a player like John Olerud who could be
drafted legitimately
at either
position, the team announces their decision when they
draft him, and that's generally the end of that.
Say what you want about Smith but Mahomes probably never ends up in a Chief uniform if Smith didn't stabilize our QB
position and bought time for GM to
draft the right QB
at the right time.
Don't know if I'd make the same one, although I do agree that you shouldn't take your 2nd choice
at a
position with the # 2 pick in the
draft.
I'd be upset if we
drafted Nelson
at 6 only because guards have minimal impact overall compared to so many other
positions, but I wouldn't be mad if we took Barkley.
To me staying
at 4
at drafting the top
position player is the most attractive option (I think QB's go 1,2,3).
By comparing the yardage props
at Sportsbook.com and BetOnline with the players average
draft position (ADP)
at Yahoo, we were able to discover some major disparities.
Jonathan Isaac — Orlando Magic Isaac's O / U
draft position was consistent
at 6.5 but the juice kept moving on the Under.