That's been the question looming over the the UN climate summit in Lima, Peru, the last two weeks, as negotiators from 195 countries have tried to hammer out
a draft climate change agreement.
Not exact matches
A final
draft statement seen by E&E News, prepared for a meeting Friday, is the first - ever bilateral
agreement on
climate change between the European Union and China.
A graph shows the number of unresolved [bracketed] sections in
drafts of the proposed Paris
climate change agreement.
On Saturday at the Paris
climate talks, negotiators released a
draft agreement that outlines, in broad strokes, a plan for curbing
climate change.
Other portions of the Paris
agreement contain legally binding language, but they are carefully
drafted to reflect pre-existing obligations the U.S. agreed to in the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change, which President George H.W. Bush signed and the Senate ratified.
A
draft (PDF) of the
agreement said, «Although additional research may be needed to help the public and policymakers better understand Alaska's
changing climate and how to anticipate and respond to its effects, the time for
climate debate is over; it is now time for
climate action.»
Our little revolutionary moment comes in a document with the memorable title «ADP 2 - 7 agenda item 3 Elements for a
draft negotiating text» with its
climate - busting section D (paragraph 13.2) outlining several possible long - term goals for a new
climate change agreement.