Sentences with phrase «drafted contract because»

The courts hesitate to infer what the parties must have intended when they have entered into a lengthy and carefully - drafted contract because any omission may be oversight or deliberate.

Not exact matches

Specifically, how the two teams have drafted over this last rookie contract cycle or over the last four drafts (and five first - round picks because of the team option for a fifth year) to best utilize youth at a relatively inexpensive price point, the thing that builds and sustains hard cap success.

Because players are only represented by the National Basketball Players Association after being drafted or signing a professional contract, there is nothing the NBPA can do, NBPA official Elle Hagedorn told ESPN.

and how much was due to Mr. I. Without those loyalty contracts the Wings would be in a much better position cap wise, though I don't think the team would be any better on the ice because regardless of those contracts the Wings haven't been able to draft and develop any of the elite players needed to be successful in today's game.

They won because Carroll teamed with a new general manager, John Schneider, and promptly drafted a slew of cheap young talent that won a championship on their rookie contracts.

So I would rather trade draft picks because his production compared to contract situation sucks.

As I've seen pointed out in many of Rook's draft profiles, these 1 - year project kids are actually just opportunities to resign a potential quality player on their second contract because they are almost never productive on their first outside the lottery.

You basically would have to draft Jordan's replacement in the draft this year, because if you give Oubre an extension, signing Jordan after next year is out the door, unless you can unload one of Wall / Beal / Porter's contract (not necessarily recommending that they do that).

Too many holes, we need more draft capital because we need to populate the roster with quality Rd 1 - 3 rookie contracts to protect the salary cap for next year.

That's the way most book contracts have been drafted for more than a century, and publishers take it for granted; only a few brave souls have asked why or argued with it because that's the way it has always been.

As my career goals are to be a transactional attorney, dealing mainly with contract drafting and focusing on non-patent intellectual property, I chose the American Rivers legal internship because it offered me an opportunity to get real experience dealing with contracts and transactional matters.

The truth is, you really can't afford to not have a lawyer draft up or review your legally binding documents and contracts because the consequences could cost you severely.

a. Prenuptial agreements will be far more expensive than would otherwise be the case because lawyers will need to analyze the parties» current and prospective circumstances in order to be able to provide any kind of useful advice, and will need to draft contracts with loose terms and enormous disclaimers in order to handle such uncertainty.

If you are going to litigate, you must be prepared to lose, and while you may not be able to control an award of damages because that amount is determined by the trier of fact, the ability to control your potential liability with regard to the opposing party's attorneys» fees and costs is squarely in your hands when you are drafting a contract.

As for using contractions in contracts, however, it's unlikely that they'll gain widespread support because their benefits — improved diction and euphony — are less critical in contract drafting.

Because as it often happens, those clients who try to economize by foregoing legal help in cases where it's necessary (such as drafting a complex trust or a contract or defending oneself in a criminal matter) later find that their self - help efforts land them in an even deeper hole, and they need to pay a lawyer far more than they would have originally to dig themselves out.

Because of the nature of the work I've been retained to do so far (i.e. drafting contracts), I've opted to offer free consultations.

The root cause is that because any transaction will closely resemble previous transactions, drafting has become largely an exercise in regurgitation, with most contract language being given a pass.

Because of our deep experience in litigation regarding virtually every conceivable type of document from non-compete agreements and confidentiality provisions in employment contracts to landlord - tenant agreements and fractional share leases, we understand how contracts need to be drafted to avoid litigation.

It is often too late for an employer to amend a poorly drafted employment contract after it has been accepted by the employee because a court will refuse to enforce the amended contract unless the employee with new consideration such as a bonus or promotion when he or she accepted the revised contractual terms.

I've never thought much about that, simply because I've always known that because contract drafting is a precedent - driven part of a notoriously conservative profession, measurable change would take time.

Significantly, approximately 30 % of termination clauses in Ontario employment contracts have not been properly drafted and will not be enforced by a court because they breach the minimum standards of the («ESA»).

In Ontario approximately 30 % of employment contracts contain termination clauses that will not be enforced by a court because the clauses have not been properly drafted.

But because reviewing draft contracts catches mistakes post-production rather than pre-production, it's equivalent to addressing (to use a Surowiecki example) production problems in televisions by making service calls instead of fixing the shortcomings in the production process that caused the problems.

Business models for law firms are evolving in part because technology is proving adept at absorption of routine tasks like discovery, case research, and contract drafting.

The old approach of «we'll leave the contract schedules for the commercial folks» no longer works when you are in - house, because you soon realise that when there's a problem, the chances are that it's the service credit schedule or the payment mechanism that's at the heart of it, and claiming that you only drafted the front end of the contract simply won't cut it.

The court found that the Broker and the Brokerage were negligent in their representation of the Bank because the contract drafted by the Broker violated specific statutes prohibiting a licensed broker from splitting a commission with an unlicensed individual.

Because these situations can quickly become complex, as a licensee you'd be wise to consult your managing broker, and to advise your clients to seek independent legal advice in the drafting of the assignment contract.