Sentences with phrase «dramatic implications if»

Here is a hypothetical question that may have dramatic implications if true.

Not exact matches

If that were to come to pass, the implications for oil prices would be dramatic.

The implications of these figures are dramatic and disturbing for the Conservatives, if we believe that UKIP voters will vote this way in the general election.

If this analysis of the BES data is indicative then dramatic changes are in store for the geography of electoral competition in May 2015 with important implications for seats.

Even if glcosepane's low tissue burden in rats means that cleaving it will not have dramatic rejuvenating effects in these animals (which is a reasonable prediction, but might be happily disproven in the event), its high prevalence in aging and diabetic human collagen, and its implication in the complications of diabetes, will make the mere demonstration of a candidate's ability to cleave glucosepane crosslinks in vivo a sufficient proof - of - concept to spur further work to move it down the therapeutic pipeline into human testing.

Although these reductions in risk might seem modest, they could have potentially dramatic implications for public health if spread out over the tens of millions of coffee drinkers in the United States, says Susan Fisher, Ph.D., chair of community and preventive medicine at the University of Rochester Medical Center, in Rochester, N.Y.

If education has such a dramatic impact on a country's economic productivity and growth, what are the implications of a less - than - adequate education system for economic growth today and in the future?

If you think that an exhaustive search of data in The CCC's possession would be too time - consuming, I suggest that you ask Lord Deben to provide the answers or to publish a retraction of his statements, which seem to have dramatic implications, but have been made without evidence.

The implications of the dramatic changes now in train have yet to be fully explored but one of them, if the Bar pursues the policy propounded by its leaders, is to remove the justification for the two branches of the profession remaining separate.

In Ghaidan v Godin - Mendoza, which Lord Phillips described as the «definitive» case on s. 3 HRA 1998, the House of Lords held that s. 3 could permit a Court to depart from a provision whose meaning was unambiguous, if that provision was not ECHR compatible, with the dramatic implication that s. 3 could oblige a Court to disregard the legislative purpose of subsequent Parliaments.