Sentences with phrase «drastic action which»

Further, the government does not want to take drastic action which could instigate Shia - Sunni tensions within the country.

Getting through this «continuing storm» required the drastic actions which are now just 16 days away.

Not exact matches

Bloomberg reported Thursday that after Draghi's bold words about protecting the euro last week, markets expect him to deliver some sort of drastic action to do so and to relieve pressure on bond yields, which have climbed steadily higher for Spain and Italy.

Qudian, which was born out of student - based Qufenqi, is facing potential class - action lawsuits in the US after drastic tumble of its stock price.

The simplest — and most drastic — action that an investor can take is to sell some of their current bond holdings and leave the proceeds in an interest bearing cash account or money - market fund which might benefit from a rise in interest rates.

Whether fans will care enough to take such drastic action is the real question upon which our future as a top club may, or rather will, depend.

If you really want changes, your going to have to prove it by taking drastic measures and personally, judging by my experience from the North Bank day's at Highbury which was a million times more hostile than the Emirates, most Arsenal fan's are all mouth with no actions!

Atlantic City could face default as early as April without «drastic action» from the state, Moody's Investors Service warned, saying the city would run out of money in the next few weeks, which could lead to bankruptcy, if two measures are not approved by lawmakers.

But unless such drastic action is taken in the next few years, we are headed for a very different world, one in which seas will rise by more than 5 metres over the coming centuries, and droughts, floods and extreme heat waves will ravage many parts of the world (see «Rising seas expected to sink islands near US capital in 50 years «-RRB-.

By suicide, which is a very drastic action, you will create commotion about the effects of videogames on people, which will result in the media and parents saying how bad videogames are.

Truth be told, I never got to finish the original when it released back in 2003, but Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga + Bowser's Minions serves up the right mix of exploration, action, and story; a sharp contrast from the Paper Mario series, which has undergone some drastic changes over the last five years (and not necessarily to its benefit).

The only other three years in which Gallup has measured this variable were from 2001 to 2003, when a slightly lower percentage of Americans advocated drastic action.

Oreskes kicks off with statistics from a recent poll which suggest that «72 % of Americans [are] completely or mostly convinced that global warming is happening» and that «sixty - two percent... believe that life on Earth will continue without major disruptions only if society takes immediate and drastic action to reduce global warming».

Our chap pointed out that this scenrio was based upon drastic action having been taken to reduce GHGs, which clearly has not happened in the last few decades.

And after another quick scan, I find table SPM.6 from the Synthesis which says emissions would need to peak sometime before the middle of the century to limit temperature rises to under 4 degrees (with a peak by 2015 to achieve less than 2 degrees warming)... I think most would agree that some degree of «drastic action» is going to be required to achieve a peak in emissions within this time frame, particularly while we have guys like you running around, would you not?

The problem with climate is that we have a lobby which is (a) convinced of pending catastrophe (b) simulateously anxious to take drastic action now without having proved it.

The Climategate emails revealed that the united and imperturbable front being presented by the principal players was a mask for some serious concerns, which required sometimes drastic and unethical action to shore up the facade.

And which can be researched in the future if sensitivity is low, without committing to drastic actions now.

There's still a lot of work to be done in making useful predictions, however, which is why I think it's perfectly reasonable to say both «anthropogenic climate change is a thing» and «we still shouldn't take any drastic actions to combat it until more is known about the consequences».

In order to keep temperatures within this range, the IPCCâ $ ™ s Fourth Assessment Report argues that global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must start declining by 2015.2 For industrialized countries, which are responsible for most of the GHGs already in the atmosphere, this implies implementing drastic cuts immediately; the latest IPCC Report suggests that compared to 1990 levels, industrialized countries might have to reduce their emissions by 25 to 40 per cent by 2020 and 80 to 95 per cent by 2050.3 Thus, there is little time left to avoid the worst impacts of climate changeâ $» ambitious action is required now.

Sure, these efforts add up over time, but considering the scale of the plastic disaster, and the continuing rate at which the planet's oceans are filling with plastic pollution, we need much more drastic action immediately.

At last, Bangladesh — which has suffered more than its share of climate fatalities — takes drastic action by threatening to inject a «million tonnes of powdered sulphates into the stratosphere» in order to «geo - engineer» global cooling.

They provide no justification for taking the very costly and drastic actions advocated in some circles to mitigate «global warming», which Eqn.

This is set to rise steadily higher — yet it is being imposed for only one reason: the widespread conviction, which is shared by politicians of all stripes and drilled into children at primary schools, that, without drastic action to reduce carbon - dioxide emissions, global warming is certain soon to accelerate, with truly catastrophic consequences by the end of the century — when temperatures could be up to five degrees higher.

K has the right, if she can not herself choose, not to have drastic surgery imposed upon her which will inevitably mean the loss of her human right to bear children unless and until it has been demonstrated that such action is in her best (wide) interests.