Sentences with phrase «draw further distinctions»

Kanner recognized that autism was more than just a schizophrenic trait, but he struggled to draw further distinctions.

Because such a painting can go in only one place, it draws a further distinction with respect to paintings of the usual kind.

Not exact matches

It's perhaps worth drawing a distinction here between bitcoin and ethereum, and the thousands of «altcoins» that have been issued so far this year.

With regard to our continuing reality, he draws a distinction between»... retained actuality and reality in the form of further actualization.

White said he drew a distinction between appointments that were straight political payoffs and those that furthered the city's goals and the mayor's agenda.

During their analysis, the researchers drew a distinction between «subclinical» (borderline) narcissism — a natural personality trait that is often referred to as healthy narcissism — and a pathological sense of superiority, which goes far beyond what might be considered healthy.

My explanation is that he managed to be so far outside the accepted New York School macho man stereotype that he made no gender distinctions, just intellectual and moral distinctions, which is one reason I was drawn to his writing and personality.

The UK Data Protection Act 1998 draws a clear distinction between personal data and sensitive data, with far greater controls being applied to the use of the latter.

I've added further clarification to the question as an edit to draw a distinction between the expected privacy of the records of the pawn shop vs. the property pledged as collateral.

On a similar note, the High Court of Bangladesh further observed that a distinction had not been drawn between international commercial arbitration taking place in Bangladesh and that taking place outside Bangladesh.

Further drawing this distinction, the court cited a federal district court case where absolute privilege applied because the individual was «for all practical purposes compelled to make his statements to the commission» and «to classify [the] statements as only conditionally privileged would have caused great harm to the administration of government and the government's ability to ensure justice was served.»

The reason or purpose underlying paragraph 12 [of the NRTA] was to secure to the Indians a supply of game and fish for their support and subsistence and clearly to permit hunting, trapping and fishing for food... In my view the distinction that Dickson J. drew in Moosehunter between hunting for «support and subsistence», and hunting for «sport or commercially» is far more consistent with the spirit of Treaty No. 8 and with the proposition that one should not assume that the legislature intended to abrogate or derogate from Treaty 8 hunting rights than the respondent's submission that in using the term «for food» the legislature intended to restrict Treaty 8 hunting rights to hunting for direct consumption of the product of the hunt.36

However, the Committee argues that as far as any further use of the powers is concerned, a distinction must be drawn between «technical amendments» (involving the maintenance and updating of the body of domesticated EU law) and «larger amendments involving policy choices» (i.e. wider ranging reform).

Far from being «discriminatory», the distinctions they draw flow directly from the statutory purpose and the scope of the mandate.