Sentences with phrase «draw the line there»

Do you want your assistant to tell you if he or she sees a conflict with your leadership team, or do you expect them to draw the line there?

The intel itself implicated the director, not his daughter, even if she was the source of it, the person adds: «We draw the line there.

Why draw the line there?

The motivation to draw the line there seems to be a religious one.

Design - debunkers such as Dawkins will point out that religious people draw the line there for reasons of «irrational» faith rather than science.

Judith — I forgot to mention that the original recipe suggests that you then cut these squares on the diagonal into triangles, but I drew the line there.

I'm just going to draw the line there.

Why would you want to draw the line there?

If you're cool with breaking canon, you can also use other Star Wars characters in the playset, but Disney draws the line there.

In 1935 the number of tridecadally averaged series drops suddenly from 11 to 8 (less than half), so we decided to draw the line there.

«Nearly 30,000 negotiations — we thought we should draw a line there.

If you don't draw the line there, where do you?

i draw the line there.

Not exact matches

The problem is it's exceedingly hard to do and there is no way to draw clear lines that won't be manipulated,» said Seth Hanlon with the Center for American Progress, a liberal group.

«The problem is it's exceedingly hard to do and there is no way to draw clear lines that won't be manipulated.»

Though now there's a «this kind of funny line,» that gets drawn about the company on finance websites.

«Is there a line you can draw between understanding how the Earth works and the so - called politically incorrect environmental monitoring?»

Determining how many independent workers there are depends on where you draw certain lines.

And it crosses over all these lines: local environmental impact, there's the climate argument, there's the First Nations rights argument, there's the stewardship argument, so it can really draw from a whole wide sector of civil society in the way that the faceless catastrophe of climate change can't.

So if you drew a horizontal line and call that fair value like Ben Graham said, and then you draw a wavy line around that horizontal line and call that stock prices, the market is pitching us opportunities all the time between stocks that are way below fair value and way above fair value, the reason investors don't beat the market has nothing to do with the market is not throwing us pitches in that it's not still emotional, they are behavioral problem, there's agency problems, there is a lot of other issues going on but it's not because we're not getting really great pictures all the time.

However, for the first 6 months, there will be no maintenance fee if you draw $ 5,000 or more during the first five days of opening the credit line.

There is no objectively right place to draw the line between cases in which the government should and should not intervene.

There is plenty of room to argue about whether British law and courts drew the line in the right place here.

The full truth is that I have nothing against trend lines, and yes I understand that there are «objective» methods out there detailing the «correct» method for choosing which two points to connect to draw a proper trend line (DeMark, Magee, I think Pring to name a few).

«Our objective is not to diminish legitimate expression of political or religious views, but rather incitement to terrorism — and there is a fine line there that the legislation will try to draw,» Kenney said in an interview Tuesday.

Gender equal opportunity does not mean there can't be a line drawn around respect for our differences.

However there was a line drawing in it.

And there must have been a line to be drawn, in order for justice to be performed.

There is some sort of imaginary line that is drawn, and everybody on one side of the line is «good with God,» and everybody on the other side needs to «get right with God.»

Second, because there probably have been other times in our history — before and immediately after the Civil War, plus the Depression and New Deal — when political lines were drawn as sharply and public rhetoric was as combatively partisan.

Where there was no longer any common standard or perspective, the line was not easily drawn between a just freedom of responsible judgement and the play of arbitrary preference.

No point in drawing lines when there are no dots to connect.

There are fuzzy lines here that are seldom clearly drawn.

Consequently, there is no need to draw the traditional lines of ontological discontinuity where there is utter material homogeneity, that is, where atoms and molecules cut across all the former boundaries in the hierarchy of beings.

We have to draw the line at doctrinal agreement between believers; there's no other way.

There's no drawing a line here, Republicans ARE Christians, the double whammy of hell fire secular law that they bullied - in only to make way for their real agenda, God's law according to their God.

The significant ethical questions have to do not only with moral boundaries, but with how these are formed, who forms them, why a particular individual or group draws the lines here rather than there, how tightly or loosely lines are drawn, and how easily they contract or expand or erode.

For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable evidence, such as the fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).

Of course, there is a line to be drawn.

And while there may be some variability in where the line is drawn, whether about sex or what - have - you, there is no doubt that There is a limit tthere may be some variability in where the line is drawn, whether about sex or what - have - you, there is no doubt that There is a limit tthere is no doubt that There is a limit tThere is a limit therethere.

One of the ancient prophets — the same, indeed, who spoke of the «king coming in gentleness» — also drew a picture of a good time to come when men of all nations will go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts; and on that day the prophet adds, «there shall no more be a trader in the house of the Lord of hosts,» 11 Jesus was offering symbolically a fulfillment of that prophecy, in line with his basic affirmation that the kingdom of God is here.

That there is a basis of fact somewhere behind it all need not be doubted, but he would be a bold man who should presume to draw a fine line between fact and symbol.

Such a person usually leaves the church so that there is no need for the church to draw the line.

Thus, while we do not know empirically that lower orders of reality have life and subjectivity, there is no reason to draw some arbitrary line absolutely separating living and non-living, or subjects and pure objects.

Because ancient man did not draw such a clear line of distinction between myth and history, it was possible for the myth of the end - time to hold a particular kind of reality for him which it can not hold for us, and there is no point in attempting to disguise this difference.

There is no reason to draw a sharp line between Christology and pneumatology.

There have been countless efforts in recent decades to draw a bright definitional line between proselytizing and evangelizing, and perhaps none of them is entirely successful.

Bottom line is there is simply no other religion on earth that draws such sharp distinction between its own members and others, or spends as much time condemning and dehumanizing those who merely choose not to follow its dogma.

First, with reference to the topic of the last section, it seems that Whitehead is doubtful that so sharp a line can be drawn between animals and humans that there is real warrant for affirming total extinction of all animals and survival of all humans.

When we come down to detail the classification is often uncertain, and there will never be unanimity about the point where the line is to be drawn.