From what I understand,
drawing down co2 and other greenhouse gases from the atmosphere with CCS technologies is way beyond our means at present to make an appreciable difference.
There is no real prospect of
drawing down CO2 too fast.
During spring, trees and other plants begin to
draw down CO2 levels to fuel leaf growth.
Use of bioenergy to
draw down CO2 should employ feedstocks from residues, wastes, and dedicated energy crops that do not compete with food crops, thus avoiding loss of natural ecosystems and cropland [183]--[185].
Surprises that could change this include going into a glacial climate state, which had the mysterious ability to
draw down CO2 in the past, or uptake by the terrestrial biosphere.
Alternatively, using raw power to
draw down CO2 does seem wrongheaded if CO2 is still being burned in significant quantities.
This is to say that one can conceivably
draw down CO2 from the atmosphere and trigger a snowball, although it would take extremely high values of CO2 (much higher than the original amount) to get back out of this glaciated state.
The essential thing about the HCV is that natural negative feedbacks to
draw down CO2 are being overwhelmed, and certain potentially very strong positive feedbacks seem to be kicking into high gear.
They suggest instead that improved agricultural and forestry practices offer a more natural way to
draw down CO2, noting that reforestation of degraded land and improved agricultural practices that retain soil carbon could draw down atmospheric CO2 by as much as 50 ppm.
Use of bioenergy to
draw down CO2 should employ feedstocks from residues, wastes, and dedicated energy crops that do not compete with food crops, thus avoiding loss of natural ecosystems and cropland [183]--[185].
Second, it takes advantage of synergies between energy storage and transport and the need to ultimately
draw down CO2 to pre-industrial levels.
Life
draws down CO2 cooling the climate and every few dozen thousand years eruptions push the levels back up creating warming spurts.
Where the missing carbon is going [carbon sinks are still hard to quantify precisely, and the whether the oceans are losing their ability to
draw down CO2 remains equivocal (and distorted by the deniers); better monitoring and accounting systems are being developed to address this critical uncertainty]
Kevin C @ 33, pumping deep ocean water to the surface will in fact draw down excess CO2, but only by limiting the extent to which the ocean will further
draw down CO2 once we stop pumping CO2 into the atmosphere.
Not exact matches
Chemical analyses of ocean cores show that the Southern Ocean
drew down at least that much
CO2 millions of years ago during glacial periods.
The results offer fresh hope to would - be geoengineers hoping to
draw down ever - increasing concentrations of industrial
CO2 in the atmosphere, such as the ill - fated company Planktos and its failed bid to fertilize the ocean off Ecuador with iron.
The ocean's biological pump works to
draw down atmospheric carbon dioxide (
CO2) by exporting carbon from the surface ocean.
The earlier benchmark happens because the biosphere
draws down only a certain amount of carbon dioxide each growing season, leaving behind excess
CO2 that hangs around into next year.
Since there is much more land and vegetation north of the equator, it is there that
CO2 concentrations fall for a few months, as plants
draw it
down from the atmosphere.
Reforestation and increase of soil carbon can help
draw down atmospheric
CO2.
I do believe that research has shown that sequestration of
CO2 in soils and biomass through organic agriculture (including the use of biochar) and reforestation (which must of course begin with ending deforestation) can
draw down the already dangerous anthropogenic excess of
CO2 and I think it is urgent that we start doing that — it's as urgent as ending
CO2 emissions as rapidly as possible.
That solution is to rapidly phase out fossil fuels and replace them with non-carbon sources of energy, use that energy with maximum efficiency, and use organic agriculture and reforestation to to
draw down the already dangerous anthropogenic excess of atmospheric
CO2.
And eventually as the far more massive ocean cooled it would be able to hold more dissolved
CO2, so atmospheric
CO2 would be
drawn down, thus reducing the greenhouse effect further (even more energy out).
We still need to end ALL anthropogenic GHG emissions as soon as possible — AND we need to beging
drawing down the excess
CO2 that we have already put into the atmosphere.
The existing anthropogenic excess of atmospheric
CO2 is self - evidently already causing dangerous warming so we do need to
draw it
down to preindustrial levels as quickly as possible.
All of this is reason for everyone and his brother, aunt and sister to greatly reduce their own GHG emissions, and to scream bloody murder till every corporation, institution and governmental body they have any influence over to immediately institute policies to rapidly bring
down GHG emissions and look at reliable ways of
drawing down atmospheric
CO2 levels directly (especially replanting grasslands in the north, tree planting toward the equator where albedo change is not an issue).
They have ranged from seeding the oceans with iron filings to
draw down atmospheric
CO2, to the launching of billions of aluminised balloons to reflect the sun's rays away from the Earth, to the installation of giant mirrors in space that intercept those rays before they reach us.
Circulation would bring fresh
CO2 from elsewhere to replenish what had been
drawn down over Antarctica.
Draw down of
CO2 plus active geo - engineering to hold the permafrost and its methane stores — and that's not even considering the need to halt falling albedo.
And then it cooled again right after that anyway — again without a concomitant «amplifying - the - cooling»
draw -
down in
CO2 concentration.
Fourth, steps must be taken to «
draw down» atmospheric
CO2 via improved farming and forestry practices, including burning of biofuels in power plants with
CO2 sequestration.
CO2 could be removed by using the
draw -
down from such methanogens, especially if they are supplied with carboxysomes (via GE).
We need to rapidly transition to a zero carbon economy, and
draw down billions of tonnes of
CO2 from the atmosphere, so it makes no sense for the SA government to allow any new projects that put us at greater climate risk, particularly in sectors where climate - safe alternatives are readily available.
We need to rapidly transition to a zero carbon economy, and
draw down billions of tonnes of
CO2 from the atmosphere in order to restore a climate that is safe for all people, species, and ecosystems.
Burning sustainably designed biofuels in power plants, with the
CO2 captured and sequestered, would also help
draw down atmospheric
CO2.
Actually my guess would be that by 2075 new technologies like inertial confinement fusion will have decreased
CO2 emissions to the point where nature is
drawing down more than we emit, so that
CO2 will decrease for a while, starting well before 2100.
We then define our assumptions about the potential for
drawing down atmospheric
CO2 via reforestation and increase of soil carbon, and we define fossil fuel emission reduction scenarios that we employ in our study.
Reforestation and increase of soil carbon can help
draw down atmospheric
CO2.
Ergo, it is simply wrong to assume that any excess
draw down of
CO2 due to the
CO2 fertilization effect will not only be matched, but exceeded by an increased production of
CO2 by cellular respiration.
The «
draw down» may be achieved by using that percentage of carbon from an atmospheric source such as agricultural waste, deliberate agriculture (e.g. azollaculture), or artificial photosynthesis via, for instance, using solar energy to hydrolyze water, and combining the hydrogen with
CO2 from the air to produce fuel.
Of course, using
CO2 dragged from the atmosphere will, in turn, drive R&D for carbon capture of various types, which will end, IMO, in
drawing down atmospheric
CO2 to pre-industrial levels.
Because of that, in any healthy plant over the course of a year, it
draws down far more
CO2 through photosynthesis then it produces by oxidizing sugars.
New methods of grazing, called Adaptive Multi-Paddock (AMP) grazing, are showing great promise in regenerating soils — and regenerated soils
draw down enormous amounts of
CO2 from the atmosphere.
The past 150 million years has seen a steady
drawing down of
CO2 from the atmosphere.
It could also have increased the rate of weathering and helped to
draw down atmospheric
CO2.
However, equilibriating the deep ocean will only
draw CO2 concentrations
down to 25 - 30 % of total emissions (Archer), or to 45 to 55 % of the net increase to a given date.
The camera irises
down to
CO2 twirling his moustachios... nothing has worked... he harrumphs in disgust,
drawing his fists
down before him as if slamming a desk... wait till next time!
In that case it would just be feasible to get atmospheric
CO2 back beneath 350 ppm via the carbon uptake potential of improved forestry and agricultural practices, which could
draw down atmospheric
CO2 by as much as about 50 ppm.
Perhaps it
draws it
down but the
CO2 outgassing from warming oceans eventually starts to catch up — after 800 years.
And if we don't take urgent action NOW to quickly end our GHG emissions and
draw down the already dangerous anthropogenic excess
CO2, then AGW is likely to have horrific effects on the entire biosphere that will go far beyond merely ending human civilization.