If those are the ones you are speaking about:: «Those who cried exclusivity and established boundaries and
drew lines of distinction and erected walls of separation are clearly those Jesus challenged,» then that sounds suspiciously like exclusion.
NP said: Those who cried exclusivity and established boundaries and
drew lines of distinction and erected walls of separation are clearly those Jesus challenged.
Call it Greek, the Hebraic character strikes us; call it a mixture of interpretation and history, and it is impossible to
draw the line of distinction.
Others have
drawn the line of distinction between the prophets and the teachers, only the apostles and prophets belonging to the general ministry.
Not exact matches
In order to make some advance in the obscurity and complexity
of the question, and to provide a guiding
line for our reflections, a
distinction must first be
drawn, even though we can not but realize that the two poles
of the
distinction are linked by manifold connections
of the most complicated kind.
Because ancient man did not
draw such a clear
line of distinction between myth and history, it was possible for the myth
of the end - time to hold a particular kind
of reality for him which it can not hold for us, and there is no point in attempting to disguise this difference.
If you want to encourage people to make moral
distinctions rather than throwing up their hands in the relativism
of helplessness, here is where to
draw the
line.
There can be no question about the propriety
of the
distinction, but where exactly the
line should be
drawn is not so clear.
Collins also
draws a clear
line of distinction.
My purpose in pointing out these differences is simply to
draw a useful
line of distinction and acknowledge that teachers
of skill - driven and fact - driven courses probably will find it more challenging to come up with the type
of problem scenarios described earlier.
Since you, and the «major writing organizations» have distilled it all down to ««if you haven't made» a certain amount
of money, you aren't the «real deal» (cliché) you must «
draw a
line in the sand» (cliché) «between AN writer and a professional author» (poor grammar) and «we should qualify a
distinction» (redundant).
While the press release does not explicitly conflate the figure
of the artist with that
of the curator, I wonder if in this contemporary moment such a
distinction still exists, and if so, where the
line is
drawn?
When I asked about other aspects
of conspiracist ideation, I questioned whether it didn't reflect a quest for meaning, at the expense
of information, along the
lines of the mythos / logos
distinction drawn by Karen Armstrong in «The Battle For God.»
First, you have to
draw a clear
line of distinction between low impact cases where the majority
of the medical care is chiropractic and moderate and high - impact cases.
The company and its employees are considered his agents and if they are acting at his direction no
line of distinction will be
drawn.
Like the
distinction between Google's similar instant - messaging apps Allo and Duo, or the repurposing
of Google Hangouts into a business - focused communications tool, the
line drawn between Google Wallet and Android Pay was confusing, unnecessary, and probably posed a setback to brand adoption.