Not exact matches
By the way, if you're
driving a late -
model car, you're already piloting a
computer on wheels that electronically controls braking, steering and other major systems.
Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global - warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been
driven not so much
by good science as
by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.
Standard equipment on the front - wheel
drive base
model affordable station wagon includes adjustable steering and throttle settings, roof rails, cruise control, air - conditioning, a height - adjustable driver seat, a tilt - and - telescoping leather - wrapped steering wheel, a trip
computer, and a six - speaker sound system fed
by a CD player, satellite radio, HD radio, and an auxiliary audio input jack.
As another example, the previously successful hedge fund, Long Term Capital Management (LTCM), was
driven into the ground in 1998 as a result of the ripple effect caused
by the Russian government's debt default, something the company's
computer models could not have predicted.
The reason is the prevalence — and profitability of automated trading, a
computer -
model driven method of trading securities used
by pension funds, mutual funds and hedge funds.
The scientistsâ $ ™ predictions also undermine the standard climate
computer models, which assert that the warming of the Earth since 1900 has been
driven solely
by man - made greenhouse gas emissions and will continue as long as carbon dioxide levels rise.
While the
computer climate
models exaggerate the warming effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide, they plausibly simulate that greater economic development
driven by growing use of fossil fuels will add more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
Climate
computer models falsely assume that plant - fertilizing carbon dioxide
drives climate change... and predict average global temperatures a full 1 degree F higher than have actually been observed
by satellites and weather balloons, a gap that is widening every year.
Climate
computer models falsely assume that plant - fertilizing carbon dioxide
drives climate change... and predict average global temperatures a full 1º F higher than have actually been observed
by satellites and weather balloons, a gap that is widening every year.
Results from an irreducibly simple climate
model,» concluded that, once discrepancies in IPCC
computer models are taken into account, the impact of CO2 -
driven manmade global warming over the next century (and beyond) is likely to be «no more than one - third to one - half of the IPCC's current projections» — that is, just 1 - 2 degrees C (2 - 4 deg F)
by 2100!
In their first comparison of observed data with
computer models, Santer and his colleagues concluded that the increase in tropopause height was
driven by the warming of the troposphere
by greenhouse gases and the cooling of the stratosphere
by ozone depletion1.
New Scientist, also known as Nude Socia.list [spam block avoider there] magazine, never misses the opportunity to use the derogatory phrase «climate - change deniers» in order to smear sound scientific argument against an unverifiable
computer modelled catastrophe
driven by harmless aerial plant food gas.
Climate scientists would benefit massively, in my considered opinion,
by abandoning their absurdly detailed and desperately manipulated
computer models driven mainly
by CO2 and the atmosphere.