Sentences with phrase «driver dummies in»

Injury measures taken from driver dummies in both tests indicate high risk of life - threatening injuries.

Both of these cars earned good ratings for driver head protection because of the standard side airbags, but the marginal performances of their structures contributed to high forces elsewhere on the driver dummies in both cars and on the rear dummy in the Verona.

Protection of the driver dummy in the same test was good or adequate.

Protection of all critical body areas was good for the driver dummy in this test.

«Even though the head injury measures on the driver dummy in the Saturn weren't high, head contact with intruding objects should be prevented.

The head of the driver dummy in the Saturn brushed past the standard side curtain airbag and was struck by the intruding barrier.

Not exact matches

Musk and company decided to load the rocket with an original Tesla Roadster with a SpaceX suit - wearing dummy in the driver's seat.

The red car — along with a dummy in the driver's seat named «Starman» — were targeting an elliptical, or egg - shaped, orbit around the sun that would at times get close to Mars.

The child - sized dummy has just helped me test the first in - car system that can sense an imminent collision with pedestrians and brake automatically if the driver doesn't.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.

Driver — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severitIn both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severitin a crash of this severity.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side airbags in the Institute's test.

However, an improvement in the driver dummy's pelvis / leg rating from «marginal» to «acceptable» would yield an overall «good» rating in the side test.

Driver — Although the intruding barrier did not hit the dummy's head in this test, the head was not protected from contacts outside the vehicle.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well in the Institute's test.

Likewise, in the side barrier test, the head of the dummy representing a 10 - year - old child, seated behind the driver, struck the roof frame in the Mercedes - Benz C - Class Cabriolet as the side airbag did not fully cover the impact area.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space wasn't maintained well.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side curtain airbag (contact with the side torso airbag is not visible in this photo).

The driver's space was maintained well in both tests, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well (Institute test car shown).

Driver — In the test of the 2009 model, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severitIn the test of the 2009 model, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severitin a crash of this severity.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well (Institute test vehicle shown).

Injury measures recorded on two dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the rear seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that the driver and / or passenger in a real - world crash would have sustained serious injury to various body regions.

In the test without optional side curtain airbags, the intruding barrier struck the driver dummy's head.

Aside from the intruded door frame when the door hinges were sheared off in the second test (shown), the dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.

(1) Injury measures are obtained from two SID - IIs dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the rear seat behind the driver.

In each side - struck vehicle are two instrumented dummies, one in the driver seat and one in the rear seat behind the driveIn each side - struck vehicle are two instrumented dummies, one in the driver seat and one in the rear seat behind the drivein the driver seat and one in the rear seat behind the drivein the rear seat behind the driver.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious skull fracture and / or brain injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity, as well as rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries.

In the side impact test for both models, measures taken from both the driver dummy and the passenger dummy seated in the rear seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this onIn the side impact test for both models, measures taken from both the driver dummy and the passenger dummy seated in the rear seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this onin the rear seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this onin a real - world crash like this one.

Injury measures obtained from the two dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and / or passenger in a real - world crash would have sustained serious injury to various parts of the body.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummies in the two tests indicate that rib fractures would be possible in a crash of this severity.

A side impact dummy representing an average male is put in the driver's seat and child dummies are placed in child restraint systems in the rear.

However, injury measures recorded on the driver dummy indicate the possibility of rib fractures and internal organ injuries in real - world crashes of similar severity.

«In the side test of the Neon, the barrier hit the heads of both the driver and rear passenger dummies,» Lund points out.

In the full width frontal test, the Touran scored maximum points for its protection of the driver dummy, with good protection of all critical body areas.

In the side test, the driver dummy's head struck the windowsill.

Injury measures obtained from the 2 dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and / or passenger in a similar real - world crash would sustain serious injury to various parts of the body.

In the test without the head protection airbag, the heads of the driver and rear passenger dummies were struck by the hood of the pickup truck.

Injury measures are recorded on a dummy in the driver seat and another in the left rear seat.

A vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.

The structure of the older Elantra allowed a lot of intrusion into the occupant compartment, and driver dummy injury measures indicated that rib fractures, internal organ injuries, and a broken left leg would be possible in a real - world crash.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the first crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and a fracture of the pelvis would be possible in a crash of this severity.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, the pelvis of the driver dummy slipped beneath the lap section of the seatbelt and protection of this area was rated as poor.

Although dummy readings were good for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions, so the protection provided to this part of the body was downgraded to marginal.

Revised for 2011, the frontal crash safety test incorporates a crash dummy representative of a small - size female in the front passenger's seat and, as before, an average - size male crash dummy in the driver's seat.