Sentences with phrase «driver dummy injury»

The structure of the older Elantra allowed a lot of intrusion into the occupant compartment, and driver dummy injury measures indicated that rib fractures, internal organ injuries, and a broken left leg would be possible in a real - world crash.

Driver dummy injury and head protection ratings for the 2009 model are assigned by the Institute as part of side crash test verification.

Not exact matches

Driver — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Intrusion into the driver's space was reasonably well controlled, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Intrusion into the driver's space was maintained reasonably well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Except for door hinge pillar deformation and parking brake pedal movement (pedal not visible), intrusion into the driver's space was reasonably well controlled, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

The driver's space was maintained well in both tests, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

The driver knee airbag deployed to protect the dummy's knees and lower legs, but forces on the right foot were just high enough to indicate the possibility of injuries.

Driver — In the test of the 2009 model, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Injury measures recorded on two dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the rear seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that the driver and / or passenger in a real - world crash would have sustained serious injury to various body regions.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious skull fracture and / or brain injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity, as well as rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries.

In the side impact test for both models, measures taken from both the driver dummy and the passenger dummy seated in the rear seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this one.

Injury measures obtained from the two dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and / or passenger in a real - world crash would have sustained serious injury to various parts of the body.

However, injury measures recorded on the driver dummy indicate the possibility of rib fractures and internal organ injuries in real - world crashes of similar severity.

Except for door hinge pillar deformation and intrusion of the parking brake pedal (not visible), the driver's space was maintained reasonably well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Injury measures obtained from the 2 dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and / or passenger in a similar real - world crash would sustain serious injury to various parts of the body.

The Institute downgraded the Smart's structural rating from good to acceptable, but the opening didn't appear to affect dummy movement during the test, and injury measures on the driver dummy were low.

A vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.

Although the overall side crash protection still would have been rated good, with low risk of injuries to both driver and rear passenger dummies, Nissan engineers were concerned about the interference with the deployment of the side curtain airbag.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity.

There is no frontal airbag to protect the driver and dummy readings indicated a high probability of serious or fatal injury in a human as a result of this contact.

Driver — Measures from the dummies in the two tests, taken together, indicate that rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity.

Except for door hinge pillar deformation, the driver's space was maintained reasonably well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

The driver was effectively unrestrained and the dummy's head hit the centre of the steering wheel with sufficient force for a high risk of fatal injury.

«If a vehicle's front - end structure absorbs and manages the crash energy so the occupant compartment remains largely intact, with little or no intrusion into the driver's space, then the dummy's movement can be controlled, and injury measures are likely to be low.

Intrusion into the driver's space was reasonably well controlled in the second test, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries plus a left femur fracture would be possible in a crash of this severity.

Intrusion into the driver's space was well controlled, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

«The optional curtain did a good job of keeping injury measures on the heads of the dummies low, but torso injury measures for the driver dummy were high.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious skull fracture and / or brain injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity.

The test dummies in the GEMs and the Tiger recorded indications of seriously debilitating or fatal injury to drivers in real - world crashes.

Intrusion into the driver footwell area contributed to high injury measures on the dummy's lower right leg, indicating the likelihood of injury.

Except for door hinge pillar deformation, intrusion into the driver's space was reasonably well controlled, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low (second test shown).

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity.

The side airbag for the driver did a good job of protecting the dummy's head, but there was major intrusion into the occupant compartment and high injury measures on the dummy's torso and pelvis.

«The optional curtain airbag did a good job of reducing the injury measures recorded on the dummies» heads, but the torso injury measures for the driver dummy were too high and there was too much intrusion,» O'Neill points out.

«Even though the head injury measures on the driver dummy in the Saturn weren't high, head contact with intruding objects should be prevented.

In the Institute's test, injury measures recorded on crash test dummies in the driver seat and rear passenger seat were low in every category.

Compression of the driver dummy's chest indicated weak protection of this part of the body and injury parameters for the lower legs revealed marginal protection.

Driver — The dummy's head was hit by the intruding barrier, producing moderately high head injury measures.

The manufacturers supplied information on basic vehicle and test parameters, measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury data recorded on a dummy representing an average - size man in the driver seat, and video of the tests.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries as well as a fracture of the pelvis would be likely in a crash of this severity.

The driver dummy's head was struck by the barrier in the 300 without side airbags, although this did not produce high head injury measures.

In contrast, survival space for the driver in the Camaro was well - maintained, and the risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions.

Injury measures taken from driver dummies in both tests indicate high risk of life - threatening injuries.

Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on three aspects of performance — measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures from a Hybrid III dummy positioned in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.

Their occupant compartments held up well, and all measures recorded on the driver dummies were low, indicating that significant injuries would be unlikely.