The role of the Indian Ocean, the stationarity of teleconnections, the determination of the leader ocean basin in
driving decadal variability, the anthropogenic role, the reduction of the model rainfall spread, and the improvement of some model components are among the most important remaining questions that continue to be the focus of current international projects.
Not exact matches
On
decadal time scales, annual streamflow variation and precipitation are driven by large - scale patterns of climate variability, such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (see teleconnections description in Climate chapter)(Pederson et al. 2011a; Seager and Hoerling
decadal time scales, annual streamflow variation and precipitation are
driven by large - scale patterns of climate
variability, such as the Pacific
Decadal Oscillation (see teleconnections description in Climate chapter)(Pederson et al. 2011a; Seager and Hoerling
Decadal Oscillation (see teleconnections description in Climate chapter)(Pederson et al. 2011a; Seager and Hoerling 2014).
Large interannual
variability in snowpack can be nested within Pacific
Decadal Oscillation (and Pacific North American)
driven patterns (e.g., see the high snow years of 1996 and 1997 that occurred during a 25 - year period of below average snowpack).
It is important to note that any potential effects will be spatially and temporally variable, depending on current forest conditions, local site characteristics, environmental influences, and annual and
decadal patterns of climate
variability, such as the El Niño - Southern Oscillation cycle, which can
drive regional weather and climate conditions.
Either there's a large
decadal - scale internal
variability driving it, such as a large pseudo-cyclical increase in deepwater formation, or the Arctic Ocean is near marginal stability under perturbation.
These factors
driving the present changes of the NHSM system are instrumental for understanding and predicting future
decadal changes and determining the proportions of climate change that are attributable to anthropogenic effects and long - term internal
variability in the complex climate system.
«Antarctic Sea - Ice Expansion between 2000 and 2014
Driven by Tropical Pacific
Decadal Climate
Variability.»
Antarctic sea - ice expansion between 2000 and 2014
driven by tropical Pacific
decadal climate
variability.
Roemmich et al (2007) suggest that mid-latitude gyres in all of the oceans are influenced by
decadal variability in the Southern and Northern Annular Modes (SAM and NAM respectively) as wind
driven currents in baroclinic oceans (Sverdrup, 1947).
Our results suggest that the
decadal AO and multidecadal LFO
drive large amplitude natural
variability in the Arctic making detection of possible long - term trends induced by greenhouse gas warming most difficult.
Furthermore the tropical Pacific
decadal variability driven by NPO interacts with ENSO and modulates its amplitude through meridional displacement of the mean intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ).
The PSA
variability, on the other hand, appears to
drive ENSO - like
decadal variability associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), affecting precipitation in the South Pacific convergence zone
decadal variability associated with the Pacific
Decadal Oscillation (PDO), affecting precipitation in the South Pacific convergence zone
Decadal Oscillation (PDO), affecting precipitation in the South Pacific convergence zone (SPCZ).
It is hypothesized that the low frequency components of stochastic atmospheric
variability in the North and South Pacific, namely, the North Pacific Oscillation (NPO) and Pacific - South American (PSA)
variability, independently
drive tropical Pacific
decadal variability.
On
decadal timescales, AMOC
variability involves a complex interplay between wind -
driven and thermohaline (buoyancy -
driven) processes.
The Pacific sst
drive most
decadal to cenntennial
variability in climate.
However, detecting acceleration is difficult because of (i) interannual
variability in GMSL largely
driven by changes in terrestrial water storage (TWS)(7 ⇓ — 9), (ii)
decadal variability in TWS (10), thermosteric sea level, and ice sheet mass loss (11) that might masquerade as a long - term acceleration over a 25 - y record, (iii) episodic
variability driven by large volcanic eruptions (12), and (iv) errors in the altimeter data, in particular, potential drifts in the instruments over time (13).
Of course,
decadal variability in clouds can only be a response to
decadal variability in the surface conditions or atmospheric circulation that
drive cloud formation, because the lifetime of cloud systems is days rather than decades.
Ghan's assertion is false that
decadal variability in clouds can «only» be a response to
decadal variability in the surface conditions or atmospheric circulation that
drive cloud formation.