Sentences with phrase «drove claims an average»

The 2.0 - litre T - Roc we drove claims an average of 42.2 mpg — not bad given the level of performance on offer.

Not exact matches

Toyota claims around 70mpg combined, but a week of mixed, real - world driving saw us average around 50mpg.

Driving into and out of Manhattan, New York bureau chief Jamie Kitman claimed to be getting 38 mpg, which ended up being our overall average.

«I drove from Crewe to Silverstone on the motorway, and I averaged 28.4 mpg,» claims Brian Gush, grandmaster of Bentley's powertrain department.

Without the benefit of an electric motor, this version of the RC can only manage around the 30mpg mark in real - world driving, with a claimed average of 38.7 mpg.

More important is claimed economy topping 74mpg and we averaged a healthy 60mpg in real - world driving.

The most economical option is the 25d, which is claimed to average 50.4 mpg, but if you want four - wheel drive then that drops to 48.7 mpg.

It doesn't average 4.7 liters / 100 km on the combined cycle as Dacia claims, but you'll be able to get 6 l / 100 km if you like to drive in an eco-friendly manner.

While we couldn't match the 4.9 L / 100 km claim, we saw an average of 5.6 L over 1300 km worth of driving (most of it highway), or roughly 850 km from the 47 - litre tank.

European figures claim it accelerates from 0 to 62 mph in 6.5 seconds, tops out at 148 mph and boasts average consumption of 29 mpg (U.S.) in four - wheel - drive 4Matic guise.

On test, we averaged 7.9 L / 100 km over a week's driving in a variety of freeway and urban conditions, which was a little way from the 5.9 L / 100 km official claim.

Filling the car with fuel is another regular cost and Ford claims the Mondeo uses 8.5 L / 100 km averaged across city and urban driving, which puts it at the thirstier end of this pack.

Officially, the coupe claims a combined average of 5.8 L / 100 km, although our trip computer read - out came in at 8.5 L / 100 km in wet conditions that encouraged conservative driving.

Both cars are front - wheel drive (of course), have a matching MacPherson strut front and multi-link rear suspension concept, a combination of vented front and solid rear disc brakes, electric - assist power steering and even claim an identical 6.0 L / 100 km fuel consumption average (on the cheapest 91 RON fuel).

The 2.5 kW rooftop system comprises a compact, high - efficiency solar panel array good for an average 3000kWh a year — enough, the pair claim, to offset a driving average of about 1000 miles (1600 km) a month.

I purchased S Cross 2 months back I driven 4000 km, according to engine car average is very poor, company claim 26 km but I am getting 17 km average only.

The claimed average fuel economy for the 170 - hp diesel - powered Insignia with manual transmission and all - wheel drive is 6.1 l / 100 km, but during our alert test routine of more than 700 kilometers, it settled at around 8.1 l / 100 km.

What's more, its low weight makes it surprisingly efficient when you're not driving it hard; it has claimed average economy of more than 40mpg.

And we didn't come too close to the 4.8 L / 100 km fuel consumption claim with an average 6.1 L / 100 km recorded over a week of urban and freeway driving.

Averages are based on a 45 - year - old married female driver driving 2012 sedan, employed, with a B.A., excellent credit score and no lapse in coverage, who has never filed a claim and has the following limits: $ 100,000 (bodily injury) / $ 300,000 (property damage) / $ 100,000 (UI / UIM), $ 10,000 (PIP) and a $ 500 deductible.

Since your vehicle, gender, driving record and claims history go into determining your monthly cost, your insurance could be higher or lower than this average rate.

Averages are based on a 45 - year - old married, female driver who drives a 2013 sedan and has never filed a claim.

If you maintain a B average or higher in school, or you have a clean driving record free of any recent accidents, speeding tickets or insurance claims, you may be eligible for a discount from your auto insurance provider.

Depending on your vehicle's age, make and model, as well as your gender, driving record and claims history, your monthly cost could be higher or lower than this average rate.

Pay as you drive car insurance coverage is designed to allow drivers to pay insurance premiums based on the number of miles they drive rather than based on traditional factors such as national averages for accidents, claim amounts and vehicle costs.

Using a hypothetical 40 - year - old female driver with a clean driving record and no prior claims, the study also examined the average cost of auto insurance in all 67 counties statewide, and some of the results were quite significant.

Using a hypothetical 40 - year - old driver with a clean driving record and no prior claims, the study also examined the average cost of auto insurance in all 88 counties statewide.

They typically offer lower rates on green cars because their studies have shown that drivers of these cars do a better job of avoiding accidents and other claims on average than the overall driving population.

Your vehicle's make, model and age, as well as your gender, driving record and claims history, will all be taken into account when finding an insurance plan and tabulating a monthly average.

However, you are not the average person — and your insurer will rate you according to a huge variety of factors, from things as simple as your credit score and driving / claims history to things as complicated as the color of your car and the crime statistics associated with the neighborhood in which you garage your car.