After a CMA has been supplied by a Brokerage there is a HIGH RISK for an undisclosed
Dual Agency problem arising that is created for the brokerage who issued that CMA irregardless with which brokerage that seller eventually listed with.
Not exact matches
the root of the
problem comes, I believe, in the «advice» department... my
problem with the generalization is that, as I have often noted:
dual agency is EVERYWHERE... RECO practices it by virtue of someone must have forgotten about
dual agency entirely, when setting up their procedures through the ministry.
This allows the brokerage to avoid
problems arising from
dual -
agency relationships for licensees at the brokerage.
Intelligent and experienced Realtors know when
dual agency can create
problems, and they understand the necessary measures to take which might include getting the lawyers more involved or simply stepping back from either the buyer or the seller.
Briefly, when a real estate company finds itself in an «in - house»
dual agency situation, management can try to solve the cross-advocating
problem of the opposing interests of their clients.
Undisclosed
dual agency is a particular
problem in states that do not have buyer's agents and, in states like New York, where buyer's
agency is a relatively new concept.
This was suggested as a solution to some of the pitfalls and perceived legal, ethical and practical
problems with Disclosed Limited
Dual Agency, and a system in which both buyer and seller could «benefit from full agency representation&r
Agency, and a system in which both buyer and seller could «benefit from full
agency representation&r
agency representation».
However, those should not preclude select qualified Realtors from delivering better deals to their clients through
dual agency than they could otherwise — eliminating one Realtor often breaks the «broken telephone»
problem in a transaction.
If limited
dual agency was a
problem, we'd see most complaints arise from situations involving limited
dual agency; but we don't.
Ending
dual agency removes the potential for conflict and serious
problems.
Two of the key recommendations: that regulators adopt Designated
Agency and Transaction Brokerage (see Definitions on page 8) to help overcome problems with the existing dual agency relatio
Agency and Transaction Brokerage (see Definitions on page 8) to help overcome
problems with the existing
dual agency relatio
agency relationship.
THAT is the
problem with
dual agency.
In terms of Designated
Agency and Transaction Brokerage, it was the view of the Task Force that dual agency is a situation that causes problems within the industry and if we could find ways to minimize those problems, the industry and consumers would benefit from
Agency and Transaction Brokerage, it was the view of the Task Force that
dual agency is a situation that causes problems within the industry and if we could find ways to minimize those problems, the industry and consumers would benefit from
agency is a situation that causes
problems within the industry and if we could find ways to minimize those
problems, the industry and consumers would benefit from that.
According to the Superintendent, ending
dual agency removes the potential for conflict and serious
problems and creates transparency for both consumers and licensees.
What Professor Foster has said, both publicly and to the Task Force, is that there is a very good likelihood that we will overcome those
problems about
dual agency and that the courts will support this business model.
REM: The Task Force recognizes the
problems raised by
dual agency, but specifically does not say
dual agency should be prohibited — why?
The
problem with
dual agency is that pesky word
agency.
After almost two years of work, the Canadian Regulators Group (CRG)
Agency Task Force is proposing two new business models — Designated Agency and Transaction Brokerage — as «best practices» solutions to ongoing problems with dual a
Agency Task Force is proposing two new business models — Designated
Agency and Transaction Brokerage — as «best practices» solutions to ongoing problems with dual a
Agency and Transaction Brokerage — as «best practices» solutions to ongoing
problems with
dual agencyagency.
Another
problem cited by the report is the increasing number of errors and omissions claims that involve
dual agency situations.
If you can ride two horses at the same time —
Dual Agency will not be a
problem.