There is NOTHING to relate ANY similarity for GRAVITY or «the Theory of Gravity» to either the «hockey stick» plot or «greenhouse supposition», certainly any such link is NOT found in SCIENCE... My only post to that thread, and that thread (being titled «hockey - stick - is - broken» last (it seems), is reprised
here: ------ At April 25, 2006 2:38 AM, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod (tm) said... It is of
dubious value to even attempt to consider «tree growth» in terms solely of «temperature» and the quantity of refutation makes worthless the concept of doing such, regardless of tree / species numbers.