The «Marriage Debt» Now let us examine what is
due in justice between husband and wife themselves.
Not exact matches
Should the
Justice Department move to block the deal, it would come as something of a surprise, especially considering that the
Justice Department's top antitrust regulator, Makan Delrahim, even said earlier this year that he did not think the deal presented a «major antitrust problem»
due to the fact that neither of the two companies directly competes
in the same spaces.
A person close to the government's side told Reuters that the
Justice Department does not intend to press the argument that it could seize the company's code, and someone on Apple's side said the company isn't worried enough to counter the veiled threat
in its brief
due Tuesday.
«To get full access to the single market you have to contribute to the budget and accept the freedoms, the four pillars and you have to accept the jurisdiction [of the European Court of
Justice],» he told Andrew Marr
in an interview
due to be aired on BBC One on Sunday.
In the weeks since the series debuted, there has been an Internet firestorm that has included countless opinions on whether or not justice was truly served and whether Avery may have suffered the second wrongful conviction of his life (he previously spent 18 years in prison for a sexual assault conviction that was later overturned due to new DNA evidence
In the weeks since the series debuted, there has been an Internet firestorm that has included countless opinions on whether or not
justice was truly served and whether Avery may have suffered the second wrongful conviction of his life (he previously spent 18 years
in prison for a sexual assault conviction that was later overturned due to new DNA evidence
in prison for a sexual assault conviction that was later overturned
due to new DNA evidence).
In 2011, AT&T announced its plan to buy T - Mobile but later backed off on the news that the
Justice Department would attempt to block the transaction
due to antitrust concerns.
¨ We believe
in justice for all, whether
in God or not; we believe as others, that we are
due equal
justice as human beings.
God will cause them to suffer
in due course, but you know — God just doesn't smite people the way He used to and sometimes one can just get sick and tired of waiting for divine
justice.
I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision)
in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage
in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the
Due Process Clause.»
In short, God allowed Israel's destruction as a judgement against their faithlessness; then almost 2000 years later, Man decides to recreate it in some misguided sense of justice due to the suffering the Jews felt at the hands of Nazi
In short, God allowed Israel's destruction as a judgement against their faithlessness; then almost 2000 years later, Man decides to recreate it
in some misguided sense of justice due to the suffering the Jews felt at the hands of Nazi
in some misguided sense of
justice due to the suffering the Jews felt at the hands of Nazis.
In convening this board, the bishops will begin a process that will, in time, ensure due process for accused priests, restore the confidence and trust of the clergy, and found procedures for the accused on the bedrock of Catholic theology and natural justic
In convening this board, the bishops will begin a process that will,
in time, ensure due process for accused priests, restore the confidence and trust of the clergy, and found procedures for the accused on the bedrock of Catholic theology and natural justic
in time, ensure
due process for accused priests, restore the confidence and trust of the clergy, and found procedures for the accused on the bedrock of Catholic theology and natural
justice.
Writing recently
in the Wall Street Journal on campus rape accusations, Peter Berkowitz asks, «Where are the professors... who will insist clearly and
in public that
due process is a fundamental component of American political institutions and culture... indispensable
in a free society to the fair administration of
justice?
(Roe's theory of «substantive
due process,» which was also the basis for Dred Scoff and Lochner, has always landed the court
in trouble, because it strikes down properly enacted laws that interfere with whatever the
justices conclude is an important «liberty»)
As members of the Christian community, we endeavor collectively to bring the love of Christ and authentic Christian freedom and
justice to all» especially the weak and helpless who, too often, are denied the respect
due all who are created
in God's image.
While this change may be viewed as moral progress, it is probably
due,
in part, to the evaporation of the sense of sin, guilt, and retributive
justice, all of which are essential to biblical religion and Catholic faith.
Once the public is suitably sensitized by news media
in a target area, pressure on lawmakers grows to provide «
justice» for those victims whose claims have expired
due to statutes of limitations.
Or, defined
in still older terms,
justice accords to each member of the body that which is his or her
due.
God is great and He will get my son
justice in due time.
Looking at this side of the ambiguity, we see a church
in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance
in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its
due; a church where changing jobs for the sake of peace and
justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks
in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective
in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.
What Jesus demands is a self - giving towards others who are
in need because they are
in need, not
due to any strict right on us as a matter of
justice.
But what is the relationship of natural law and history to the text when Chief
Justice Taney could find
in the
due process clause a constitutional right to own slaves and
Justice Blackmun, with the concurrence of six of Ids colleagues, found
in the same clause a right to an abortion?
«If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which,
in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe
due to those by whom the offense came,» Lincoln continued, then what other sense can this war have, except that God has willed that the war should be a mechanism of
justice, «until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword»?
In fact, the first paragraph of the City of God alludes to the famous passage from the prophet Habakkuk, «the just shall live by faith,» and in book nineteen Augustine cites Habakkuk twice, most notably at a point where he links the just person (iustus) to the justice (iustitia) due God «who rules an obedient city according to his grace.&raqu
In fact, the first paragraph of the City of God alludes to the famous passage from the prophet Habakkuk, «the just shall live by faith,» and
in book nineteen Augustine cites Habakkuk twice, most notably at a point where he links the just person (iustus) to the justice (iustitia) due God «who rules an obedient city according to his grace.&raqu
in book nineteen Augustine cites Habakkuk twice, most notably at a point where he links the just person (iustus) to the
justice (iustitia)
due God «who rules an obedient city according to his grace.»
The classical definition of
justice was to «render to each his
due,» but according to Augustine, this must be understood
in light of the biblical precept, «Let no one owe anything except to love one another.»
The
justice due the poor shall not be perverted
in lawsuits (Ex.
The language may not be stirring, but the thought is a clear development of John Paul II's observations
in his great social encyclical, Centesimus Annus:» [P] rior to the logic of a fair exchange of goods and the forms of
justice appropriate to it, there exists something which is
due to man because he is man, by reason of his lofty dignity» (35).
Christianity, another maintains, gives us the key to the problem of
justice in our time, enabling us to know what is
due to every man and how to give it to him.
We should support the recent decision to bring up to date our
dues to the UN, which are several years
in arrears, and we should place ourselves once again under the jurisdiction of the International Court of
Justice.
Isaiah envisioned Israel's mission as entailing
in part the mediation of conflict among nations under impartial international law; a world court
in Zion, judging by truth and
justice under
due process, would enable warring factions to «beat their swords into plowshares» that is, to give up conflict and concentrate on economic development.
Justice can be rationally defined as in Aristotle's ethics where it is distributive justice, giving to each his due, or commutative justice, establishing a collective order of freedom and mut
Justice can be rationally defined as
in Aristotle's ethics where it is distributive
justice, giving to each his due, or commutative justice, establishing a collective order of freedom and mut
justice, giving to each his
due, or commutative
justice, establishing a collective order of freedom and mut
justice, establishing a collective order of freedom and mutuality.
But the purpose stands sure
in God's providence; and every good deed, every right and brave action, every move towards
justice and good will amongst men, every search for truth, every creation of beauty, above all, every humble and holy life, plays its
due part
in the accomplishment of that purpose.
Humans participate
in this, but
due to our rebellion against God, came under His judgment, and unable to make right judgments on our own, and so our role
in God's
justice is limited.
I guess that my belief about government playing a part
in providing social
justice is partly
due to the fact that according to Paul, government is «ordained by God» (Romans 13:2) to promote
justice, restrain evil, and protect the people under its care (Romans 13:3 - 4).
But it's easier than ever
in others —
due largely to the techno - successes of modern science and the effective
justice of the modern science of government — and far from impossible overall.
Granted that faith does indeed imply
justice in the generally moral sense of right action that gives each his or her
due, what this does and does not imply depends upon some understanding of what is
due to those whose interests are affected by our action and of what we are able to do to realize these interests.
Did the
Justices not read into the
due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment a «right to freedom of contract»
in whose name they frustrated the legislative will and usurped the constitutional authority of the elected representatives of the people?
«You shall not pervert the
justice due to the resident alien... but you shall remember that you were a slave
in Egypt and YHWH your God redeemed you from there.»
It is
justice in a biblical sense, which is more than retributive, more than giving everybody what they deserve (or «to each his
due,» as the classical conception of
justice has it).
But what makes it a constitutional right so implicit
in due process that without it neither liberty nor
justice would exist?
The most important argument used by Chief
Justice Roger Taney
in denying Dred Scott his freedom was a
due process one.
In a statement, the DORH said: «State Attorney's Office in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 1
In a statement, the DORH said: «State Attorney's Office
in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 1
in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985)
due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court
in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 1
in Osijek committed a crime against
justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 11.
The proceedings
in an application seeking permanent forfeiture of 5.7 million dollars belonging to former First Lady, Mrs Patience Jonathan was on Wednesday stalled
due to the absence of
Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of a Federal High Court Lagos.
In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»
In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»
in 1942, Chief
Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the
due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact».
«
In the light of the foregoing, our client has instructed us to serve you notice of its intention to institute legal proceeding against the State as a result of the wrongful interference by State officials with our client's right to» prospect on its concession and also a breach of its right to administrative
justice, the latter cause of action resulting from the seizure and - detention of trucks without,
due process as well as recover all sums of money our client must pay to Engineers an Planners by reason of the actions of die State officials responsible for the seizure and detention of the trucks.»
In short, the Justice Department believes that «due process» (a right of all U.S. citizens) does not mean «judicial process» in situations of national securit
In short, the
Justice Department believes that «
due process» (a right of all U.S. citizens) does not mean «judicial process»
in situations of national securit
in situations of national security.
In January 2008 Bushell stepped down as the Mayoral candidate due to work commitments and Fathers 4 Justice founder Matt O'Connor was selected by the English Democrats in his place with his campaign expected to start on 14 Februar
In January 2008 Bushell stepped down as the Mayoral candidate
due to work commitments and Fathers 4
Justice founder Matt O'Connor was selected by the English Democrats
in his place with his campaign expected to start on 14 Februar
in his place with his campaign expected to start on 14 February.
According to the president, the reputation of the judiciary has been negatively affected
due to delays
in the administration of
justice delivery.
In his bench ruling, Justice Abang asked the DSS boss to produce Dasuki in court, while the subpoena on the former President was stepped down due to non servic
In his bench ruling,
Justice Abang asked the DSS boss to produce Dasuki
in court, while the subpoena on the former President was stepped down due to non servic
in court, while the subpoena on the former President was stepped down
due to non service.
There is a clear case of public interest
in the
due administration of
justice, and no one would plausibly question that the proper administration of
justice requires a transparent and accountable
justice system.
He told MPs: «The government will conduct further consultations on the arrangements for this vote,
in particular with the European scrutiny committees, and the Commons and Lords home affairs and
justice select committees and a further announcement will be made
in due course.»