Not exact matches
The
DUP's co-operation will surely require further investment in the grant — especially to offset the impact of Brexit and the region's loss of European Union
funds.
Our investigations have found that the fine was issued to the
DUP's controversial Brexit backers, the Constitutional Research Council, and that the only law it can have broken, given the size and nature of the fine, is of complying with rules requiring them to tell the Electoral Commission where their
funding comes from.
@JamesK to clearly define the level of sleaze for those not aware, the # 1 billion is the estimated cost of additional infrastructure
funding being provided to the Northern Ireland executive, not (directly) to the
DUP itself.
The # 1 billion
funding package agreed with the Tories last month, in return for the
DUP's ten Westminster votes, was not conditional on a restoration of power - sharing.
In this case, it appears the Conservatives and the
DUP have agreed a small tranche of additional legislation where the Tories can expect
DUP support, in exchange for support for certain
DUP positions, and an estimated # 1 billion of additional infrastructure
funding being provided to the Northern Ireland executive.
In a letter to Northern Ireland Secretary James Brokenshire seen by openDemocracy, Scottish National Party MP Martin Doherty - Hughes says that the public should know who
funded the
DUP's Brexit campaign — and points out that the Secretary of State has the power to publish all political donations since 1 January 2014 under legislation that is already on the statute books, but which has never been enacted.
After the Brexit vote, the
DUP transferred # 9,000 remaining from the donation it received for its Brexit campaign into normal party
funds.
(Baker subsequently received
funding from the Constitutional Research Council, the secretive organisation that gave the
DUP more than # 425,000 for its Brexit campaign.)
Although the
DUP and the CRC maintain the
funds complied with the law, a # 6,000 fine was imposed by the Electoral Commission in August this year.
openDemocracy asked
DUP MP Jeffrey Donaldson if he could name the individuals who
funded his party's Brexit campaign.
openDemocracy contacted the
DUP, the official Vote Leave campaign, and Aaron Banks» Leave.EU to ask about the source of the Brexit campaign
funds.
The
DUP didn't get back, Vote Leave denied any knowledge and Leave.EU said that they believe, though can't prove, that the
funding came through Vote Leave.
The Electoral Commission has confirmed to openDemocracy that in the European referendum, where the whole country was treated as a single constituency, donations made to a Northern Irish party such as the
DUP could be used to
fund campaigning in Scotland, England and Wales, and yet Northern Irish secrecy laws still apply to this cash.
The
DUP has said that the Brexit campaign
funding — which the party refused to disclose until pressure in the wake of openDemocracy's revelations last week — was «a great success».
Someone may say «Alright then, lets allocate our money in one super
duper well - diversified index
fund and that's all», but it is not that simple.
News that the government had located the magic money tree for its # 1.5 bn deal with the
DUP prompted (unsurprisingly) renewed calls for more
funding for legal aid; you can read Catherine Baksi's article about this here.